IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-35240-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-covid medical complaints following infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron vs Delta variants

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Magnusson

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health
    Lund University)

  • Doris Tove Kristoffersen

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health)

  • Andrea Dell’Isola

    (Lund University)

  • Ali Kiadaliri

    (Lund University
    Lund University)

  • Aleksandra Turkiewicz

    (Lund University)

  • Jos Runhaar

    (Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam)

  • Sita Bierma-Zeinstra

    (Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam
    Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam)

  • Martin Englund

    (Lund University)

  • Per Minor Magnus

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health)

  • Jonas Minet Kinge

    (Norwegian Institute of Public Health
    University of Oslo)

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant has been associated with less severe acute disease, however, concerns remain as to whether long-term complaints persist to a similar extent as for earlier variants. Studying 1 323 145 persons aged 18-70 years living in Norway with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection in a prospective cohort study, we found that individuals infected with Omicron had a similar risk of post-covid complaints (fatigue, cough, heart palpitations, shortness of breath and anxiety/depression) as individuals infected with Delta (B.1.617.2), from 14 to up to 126 days after testing positive, both in the acute (14 to 29 days), sub-acute (30 to 89 days) and chronic post-covid (≥90 days) phases. However, at ≥90 days after testing positive, individuals infected with Omicron had a lower risk of having any complaint (43 (95%CI = 14 to 72) fewer per 10,000), as well as a lower risk of musculoskeletal pain (23 (95%CI = 2-43) fewer per 10,000) than individuals infected with Delta. Our findings suggest that the acute and sub-acute burden of post-covid complaints on health services is similar for Omicron and Delta. The chronic burden may be lower for Omicron vs Delta when considering musculoskeletal pain, but not when considering other typical post-covid complaints.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Magnusson & Doris Tove Kristoffersen & Andrea Dell’Isola & Ali Kiadaliri & Aleksandra Turkiewicz & Jos Runhaar & Sita Bierma-Zeinstra & Martin Englund & Per Minor Magnus & Jonas Minet Kinge, 2022. "Post-covid medical complaints following infection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron vs Delta variants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-35240-2
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35240-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35240-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-35240-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claire E. Hastie & David J. Lowe & Andrew McAuley & Nicholas L. Mills & Andrew J. Winter & Corri Black & Janet T. Scott & Catherine A. O’Donnell & David N. Blane & Susan Browne & Tracy R. Ibbotson & J, 2023. "True prevalence of long-COVID in a nationwide, population cohort study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Kristin Kostka & Elena Roel & Nhung T. H. Trinh & Núria Mercadé-Besora & Antonella Delmestri & Lourdes Mateu & Roger Paredes & Talita Duarte-Salles & Daniel Prieto-Alhambra & Martí Català & Annika M. , 2023. "The burden of post-acute COVID-19 symptoms in a multinational network cohort analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. B-A. Reme & J. Gjesvik & K. Magnusson, 2023. "Predictors of the post-COVID condition following mild SARS-CoV-2 infection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Debbie E. Malden & In-Lu Amy Liu & Lei Qian & Lina S. Sy & Bruno J. Lewin & Dawn T. Asamura & Denison S. Ryan & Cassandra Bezi & Joshua T. B. Williams & Robyn Kaiser & Matthew F. Daley & Jennifer C. N, 2024. "Post-COVID conditions following COVID-19 vaccination: a retrospective matched cohort study of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-35240-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.