IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-30366-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mothers with higher twinning propensity had lower fertility in pre-industrial Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Ian J. Rickard

    (Durham University
    Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research)

  • Colin Vullioud

    (Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research)

  • François Rousset

    (Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD)

  • Erik Postma

    (University of Exeter)

  • Samuli Helle

    (University of Turku)

  • Virpi Lummaa

    (University of Turku)

  • Ritva Kylli

    (University of Oulu)

  • Jenni E. Pettay

    (University of Turku)

  • Eivin Røskaft

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Gine R. Skjærvø

    (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)

  • Charlotte Störmer

    (Justus Liebig University Gießen)

  • Eckart Voland

    (Justus Liebig University Gießen)

  • Dominique Waldvogel

    (University of Zurich)

  • Alexandre Courtiol

    (Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research)

Abstract

Historically, mothers producing twins gave birth, on average, more often than non-twinners. This observation has been interpreted as twinners having higher intrinsic fertility – a tendency to conceive easily irrespective of age and other factors – which has shaped both hypotheses about why twinning persists and varies across populations, and the design of medical studies on female fertility. Here we show in >20k pre-industrial European mothers that this interpretation results from an ecological fallacy: twinners had more births not due to higher intrinsic fertility, but because mothers that gave birth more accumulated more opportunities to produce twins. Controlling for variation in the exposure to the risk of twinning reveals that mothers with higher twinning propensity – a physiological predisposition to producing twins – had fewer births, and when twin mortality was high, fewer offspring reaching adulthood. Twinning rates may thus be driven by variation in its mortality costs, rather than variation in intrinsic fertility.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian J. Rickard & Colin Vullioud & François Rousset & Erik Postma & Samuli Helle & Virpi Lummaa & Ritva Kylli & Jenni E. Pettay & Eivin Røskaft & Gine R. Skjærvø & Charlotte Störmer & Eckart Voland & D, 2022. "Mothers with higher twinning propensity had lower fertility in pre-industrial Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-30366-9
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30366-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30366-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-30366-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenni E Pettay & Mirkka Lahdenperä & Anna Rotkirch & Virpi Lummaa & Jonathan PruittHandling editor, 2018. "Effects of female reproductive competition on birth rate and reproductive scheduling in a historical human population," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(2), pages 333-341.
    2. Gregory Clark & Neil Cummins & Matthew Curtis, 2020. "Twins Support the Absence of Parity-Dependent Fertility Control in Pretransition Populations," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(4), pages 1571-1595, August.
    3. Virpi Lummaa & Erkki Haukioja & Risto Lemmetyinen & Mirja Pikkola, 1998. "Natural selection on human twinning," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6693), pages 533-534, August.
    4. Florin Vaida & Suzette Blanchard, 2005. "Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(2), pages 351-370, June.
    5. James R. Bland & Amanda C. Cook, 2019. "Random effects probit and logit: understanding predictions and marginal effects," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 116-123, January.
    6. Jeroen Smits & Christiaan Monden, 2011. "Twinning across the Developing World," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-5, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bijlsma Ineke & van den Brakel Jan & van der Velden Rolf & Allen Jim, 2020. "Estimating Literacy Levels at a Detailed Regional Level: an Application Using Dutch Data," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 251-274, June.
    2. Jie Huang & Haiming Zhou & Nader Ebrahimi, 2022. "Bayesian Bivariate Cure Rate Models Using Copula Functions," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(3), pages 1-9, May.
    3. Yuzuru Kumon & Mohamed Saleh, 2023. "The Middle‐Eastern marriage pattern? Malthusian dynamics in nineteenth‐century Egypt," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1231-1258, November.
    4. Marissa M Rurka & J Jill Suitor & Megan Gilligan & Robert T Frase & Zhen Cong, 2023. "How Do Own and Siblings’ Genders Shape Caregivers’ Risk of Perceiving Care-Related Criticism From Siblings?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(3), pages 520-531.
    5. Simona Buscemi & Antonella Plaia, 2020. "Model selection in linear mixed-effect models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 529-575, December.
    6. Ward, Eric J., 2008. "A review and comparison of four commonly used Bayesian and maximum likelihood model selection tools," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 1-10.
    7. Fenske, James & Wang, Shizhuo, 2023. "Tradition and mortality: Evidence from twin infanticide in Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    8. María José Lombardía & Esther López‐Vizcaíno & Cristina Rueda, 2017. "Mixed generalized Akaike information criterion for small area models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(4), pages 1229-1252, October.
    9. Mojtaba Ganjali & Taban Baghfalaki, 2018. "Application of Penalized Mixed Model in Identification of Genes in Yeast Cell-Cycle Gene Expression Data," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 6(2), pages 38-41, April.
    10. Jiang, Jiming & Nguyen, Thuan & Rao, J. Sunil, 2009. "A simplified adaptive fence procedure," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(5), pages 625-629, March.
    11. Kawakubo, Yuki & Kubokawa, Tatsuya, 2014. "Modified conditional AIC in linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 44-56.
    12. Lizandra C. Fabio & Francisco J. A. Cysneiros & Gilberto A. Paula & Jalmar M. F. Carrasco, 2022. "Hierarchical and multivariate regression models to fit correlated asymmetric positive continuous outcomes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 1435-1459, July.
    13. Eric F. Lock & Nidhi Kohli & Maitreyee Bose, 2018. "Detecting Multiple Random Changepoints in Bayesian Piecewise Growth Mixture Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 733-750, September.
    14. Braun, Julia & Sabanés Bové, Daniel & Held, Leonhard, 2014. "Choice of generalized linear mixed models using predictive crossvalidation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 190-202.
    15. Uwe Jirjahn & Thi Xuan Thu Le, 2024. "Political spillovers of workplace democracy in Germany," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 5-31, March.
    16. Sun-Joo Cho & Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Paul De Boeck & Matthew Naveiras & Si On Yoon & Aaron Benjamin, 2023. "Incorporating Functional Response Time Effects into a Signal Detection Theory Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 1056-1086, September.
    17. Alice Tagliani-Ribeiro & Mariana Oliveira & Adriana K Sassi & Maira R Rodrigues & Marcelo Zagonel-Oliveira & Gary Steinman & Ursula Matte & Nelson J R Fagundes & Lavinia Schuler-Faccini, 2011. "Twin Town in South Brazil: A Nazi's Experiment or a Genetic Founder Effect?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-8, June.
    18. Yu, Dalei & Yau, Kelvin K.W., 2012. "Conditional Akaike information criterion for generalized linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 629-644.
    19. María José Lombardía & Esther López-Vizcaíno & Cristina Rueda, 2021. "Selection model for domains across time: application to labour force survey by economic activities," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 228-254, March.
    20. J. N. K. Rao, 2015. "Inferential Issues In Model-Based Small Area Estimation: Some New Developments," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 16(4), pages 491-510, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-30366-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.