IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-022-28277-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Removal of lycopene substrate inhibition enables high carotenoid productivity in Yarrowia lipolytica

Author

Listed:
  • Yongshuo Ma

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Nian Liu

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Bristol Myers Squibb)

  • Per Greisen

    (Global Research, Novo Nordisk A/S)

  • Jingbo Li

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Kangjian Qiao

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Sanwen Huang

    (Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences)

  • Gregory Stephanopoulos

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

Abstract

Substrate inhibition of enzymes can be a major obstacle to the production of valuable chemicals in engineered microorganisms. Here, we show substrate inhibition of lycopene cyclase as the main limitation in carotenoid biosynthesis in Yarrowia lipolytica. To overcome this bottleneck, we exploit two independent approaches. Structure-guided protein engineering yields a variant, Y27R, characterized by complete loss of substrate inhibition without reduction of enzymatic activity. Alternatively, establishing a geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase-mediated flux flow restrictor also prevents the onset of substrate inhibition by diverting metabolic flux away from the inhibitory metabolite while maintaining sufficient flux towards product formation. Both approaches result in high levels of near-exclusive β-carotene production. Ultimately, we construct strains capable of producing 39.5 g/L β-carotene at a productivity of 0.165 g/L/h in bioreactor fermentations (a 1441-fold improvement over the initial strain). Our findings provide effective approaches for removing substrate inhibition in engineering pathways for efficient synthesis of natural products.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongshuo Ma & Nian Liu & Per Greisen & Jingbo Li & Kangjian Qiao & Sanwen Huang & Gregory Stephanopoulos, 2022. "Removal of lycopene substrate inhibition enables high carotenoid productivity in Yarrowia lipolytica," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28277-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28277-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-28277-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-022-28277-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yanran Li & Christina D. Smolke, 2016. "Engineering biosynthesis of the anticancer alkaloid noscapine in yeast," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing-Qi Huang & Renqiuguo Li & Jianxin Fu & Natalia Dudareva, 2022. "A peroxisomal heterodimeric enzyme is involved in benzaldehyde synthesis in plants," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Dowan Kim & Myunghee Jung & In Jin Ha & Min Young Lee & Seok-Geun Lee & Younhee Shin & Sathiyamoorthy Subramaniyam & Jaehyeon Oh, 2018. "Transcriptional Profiles of Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis Genes and Cytochromes in the Leaves of Four Papaver Species," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-15, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-022-28277-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.