IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v13y2022i1d10.1038_s41467-021-27849-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning in continuous action space for developing high dimensional potential energy models

Author

Listed:
  • Sukriti Manna

    (Argonne National Laboratory
    University of Illinois)

  • Troy D. Loeffler

    (Argonne National Laboratory
    University of Illinois)

  • Rohit Batra

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Suvo Banik

    (Argonne National Laboratory
    University of Illinois)

  • Henry Chan

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Bilvin Varughese

    (Argonne National Laboratory
    University of Illinois)

  • Kiran Sasikumar

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Michael Sternberg

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Tom Peterka

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Mathew J. Cherukara

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Stephen K. Gray

    (Argonne National Laboratory)

  • Bobby G. Sumpter

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

  • Subramanian K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan

    (Argonne National Laboratory
    University of Illinois)

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) approaches that combine a tree search with deep learning have found remarkable success in searching exorbitantly large, albeit discrete action spaces, as in chess, Shogi and Go. Many real-world materials discovery and design applications, however, involve multi-dimensional search problems and learning domains that have continuous action spaces. Exploring high-dimensional potential energy models of materials is an example. Traditionally, these searches are time consuming (often several years for a single bulk system) and driven by human intuition and/or expertise and more recently by global/local optimization searches that have issues with convergence and/or do not scale well with the search dimensionality. Here, in a departure from discrete action and other gradient-based approaches, we introduce a RL strategy based on decision trees that incorporates modified rewards for improved exploration, efficient sampling during playouts and a “window scaling scheme" for enhanced exploitation, to enable efficient and scalable search for continuous action space problems. Using high-dimensional artificial landscapes and control RL problems, we successfully benchmark our approach against popular global optimization schemes and state of the art policy gradient methods, respectively. We demonstrate its efficacy to parameterize potential models (physics based and high-dimensional neural networks) for 54 different elemental systems across the periodic table as well as alloys. We analyze error trends across different elements in the latent space and trace their origin to elemental structural diversity and the smoothness of the element energy surface. Broadly, our RL strategy will be applicable to many other physical science problems involving search over continuous action spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Sukriti Manna & Troy D. Loeffler & Rohit Batra & Suvo Banik & Henry Chan & Bilvin Varughese & Kiran Sasikumar & Michael Sternberg & Tom Peterka & Mathew J. Cherukara & Stephen K. Gray & Bobby G. Sumpt, 2022. "Learning in continuous action space for developing high dimensional potential energy models," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27849-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27849-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27849-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-021-27849-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Silver & Aja Huang & Chris J. Maddison & Arthur Guez & Laurent Sifre & George van den Driessche & Julian Schrittwieser & Ioannis Antonoglou & Veda Panneershelvam & Marc Lanctot & Sander Dieleman, 2016. "Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7587), pages 484-489, January.
    2. Keith T. Butler & Daniel W. Davies & Hugh Cartwright & Olexandr Isayev & Aron Walsh, 2018. "Machine learning for molecular and materials science," Nature, Nature, vol. 559(7715), pages 547-555, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Srilok Srinivasan & Rohit Batra & Duan Luo & Troy Loeffler & Sukriti Manna & Henry Chan & Liuxiang Yang & Wenge Yang & Jianguo Wen & Pierre Darancet & Subramanian K.R.S. Sankaranarayanan, 2022. "Machine learning the metastable phase diagram of covalently bonded carbon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Zhu & Merry H. Ma, 2022. "Deriving the Optimal Strategy for the Two Dice Pig Game via Reinforcement Learning," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio Execution in a Regime-switching Market with Non-linear Impact Costs: Combining Dynamic Program and Neural Network," Papers 2306.08809, arXiv.org.
    3. Han Li & Ruotian Zhang & Yaosen Min & Dacheng Ma & Dan Zhao & Jianyang Zeng, 2023. "A knowledge-guided pre-training framework for improving molecular representation learning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Pedro Afonso Fernandes, 2024. "Forecasting with Neuro-Dynamic Programming," Papers 2404.03737, arXiv.org.
    5. Nathan Companez & Aldeida Aleti, 2016. "Can Monte-Carlo Tree Search learn to sacrifice?," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 783-813, December.
    6. Yuchen Zhang & Wei Yang, 2022. "Breakthrough invention and problem complexity: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2510-2544, December.
    7. Yassine Chemingui & Adel Gastli & Omar Ellabban, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning-Based School Energy Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    9. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. JinHyo Joseph Yun & EuiSeob Jeong & Xiaofei Zhao & Sung Deuk Hahm & KyungHun Kim, 2019. "Collective Intelligence: An Emerging World in Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Tian Xie & Arthur France-Lanord & Yanming Wang & Jeffrey Lopez & Michael A. Stolberg & Megan Hill & Graham Michael Leverick & Rafael Gomez-Bombarelli & Jeremiah A. Johnson & Yang Shao-Horn & Jeffrey C, 2022. "Accelerating amorphous polymer electrolyte screening by learning to reduce errors in molecular dynamics simulated properties," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    12. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    14. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    15. Gokhale, Gargya & Claessens, Bert & Develder, Chris, 2022. "Physics informed neural networks for control oriented thermal modeling of buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    16. O. V. Mythreyi & M. Rohith Srinivaas & Tigga Amit Kumar & R. Jayaganthan, 2021. "Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Corrosion Behavior in Additively Manufactured Inconel 718," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Li Xia, 2020. "Risk‐Sensitive Markov Decision Processes with Combined Metrics of Mean and Variance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2808-2827, December.
    18. Sabrina Evans & Paolo Turrini, 2023. "Improving Strategic Decisions in Sequential Games by Exploiting Positional Similarity," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, April.
    19. Neha Soni & Enakshi Khular Sharma & Narotam Singh & Amita Kapoor, 2019. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Businesses: from Research, Innovation, Market Deployment to Future Shifts in Business Models," Papers 1905.02092, arXiv.org.
    20. Wei-Chang Yeh & Yu-Hsin Hsieh & Chia-Ling Huang, 2022. "Newly Developed Flexible Grid Trading Model Combined ANN and SSO algorithm," Papers 2211.12839, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:13:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-021-27849-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.