IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v10y2019i1d10.1038_s41467-019-08535-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient cross-trait penalized regression increases prediction accuracy in large cohorts using secondary phenotypes

Author

Listed:
  • Wonil Chung

    (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

  • Jun Chen

    (Mayo Clinic)

  • Constance Turman

    (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

  • Sara Lindstrom

    (University of Washington)

  • Zhaozhong Zhu

    (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

  • Po-Ru Loh

    (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT)

  • Peter Kraft

    (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

  • Liming Liang

    (Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
    Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health)

Abstract

We introduce cross-trait penalized regression (CTPR), a powerful and practical approach for multi-trait polygenic risk prediction in large cohorts. Specifically, we propose a novel cross-trait penalty function with the Lasso and the minimax concave penalty (MCP) to incorporate the shared genetic effects across multiple traits for large-sample GWAS data. Our approach extracts information from the secondary traits that is beneficial for predicting the primary trait based on individual-level genotypes and/or summary statistics. Our novel implementation of a parallel computing algorithm makes it feasible to apply our method to biobank-scale GWAS data. We illustrate our method using large-scale GWAS data (~1M SNPs) from the UK Biobank (N = 456,837). We show that our multi-trait method outperforms the recently proposed multi-trait analysis of GWAS (MTAG) for predictive performance. The prediction accuracy for height by the aid of BMI improves from R2 = 35.8% (MTAG) to 42.5% (MCP + CTPR) or 42.8% (Lasso + CTPR) with UK Biobank data.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonil Chung & Jun Chen & Constance Turman & Sara Lindstrom & Zhaozhong Zhu & Po-Ru Loh & Peter Kraft & Liming Liang, 2019. "Efficient cross-trait penalized regression increases prediction accuracy in large cohorts using secondary phenotypes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-08535-0
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08535-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-08535-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-019-08535-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clara Albiñana & Zhihong Zhu & Andrew J. Schork & Andrés Ingason & Hugues Aschard & Isabell Brikell & Cynthia M. Bulik & Liselotte V. Petersen & Esben Agerbo & Jakob Grove & Merete Nordentoft & David , 2023. "Multi-PGS enhances polygenic prediction by combining 937 polygenic scores," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Yosuke Tanigawa & Junyang Qian & Guhan Venkataraman & Johanne Marie Justesen & Ruilin Li & Robert Tibshirani & Trevor Hastie & Manuel A Rivas, 2022. "Significant sparse polygenic risk scores across 813 traits in UK Biobank," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:10:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-019-08535-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.