IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcli/v11y2021i5d10.1038_s41558-021-01033-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Grassi

    (European Commission)

  • Elke Stehfest

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency)

  • Joeri Rogelj

    (Imperial College London
    International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA))

  • Detlef Vuuren

    (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
    Utrecht University)

  • Alessandro Cescatti

    (European Commission)

  • Jo House

    (University of Bristol)

  • Gert-Jan Nabuurs

    (Wageningen University and Research)

  • Simone Rossi

    (European Commission)

  • Ramdane Alkama

    (European Commission)

  • Raúl Abad Viñas

    (European Commission)

  • Katherine Calvin

    (Joint Global Change Research Institute at the University of Maryland–College Park)

  • Guido Ceccherini

    (European Commission)

  • Sandro Federici

    (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies)

  • Shinichiro Fujimori

    (International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA)
    Kyoto University
    National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES))

  • Mykola Gusti

    (International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA)
    Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Tomoko Hasegawa

    (National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)
    Ritsumeikan University)

  • Petr Havlik

    (International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA))

  • Florian Humpenöder

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK))

  • Anu Korosuo

    (European Commission)

  • Lucia Perugini

    (Foundation Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC))

  • Francesco N. Tubiello

    (Via Terme di Caracalla)

  • Alexander Popp

    (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK))

Abstract

Mitigation pathways by Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) describe future emissions that keep global warming below specific temperature limits and are compared with countries’ collective greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction pledges. This is needed to assess mitigation progress and inform emission targets under the Paris Agreement. Currently, however, a mismatch of ~5.5 GtCO2 yr−1 exists between the global land-use fluxes estimated with IAMs and from countries’ GHG inventories. Here we present a ‘Rosetta stone’ adjustment to translate IAMs’ land-use mitigation pathways to estimates more comparable with GHG inventories. This does not change the original decarbonization pathways, but reallocates part of the land sink to be consistent with GHG inventories. Adjusted cumulative emissions over the period until net zero for 1.5 or 2 °C limits are reduced by 120–192 GtCO2 relative to the original IAM pathways. These differences should be taken into account to ensure an accurate assessment of progress towards the Paris Agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Grassi & Elke Stehfest & Joeri Rogelj & Detlef Vuuren & Alessandro Cescatti & Jo House & Gert-Jan Nabuurs & Simone Rossi & Ramdane Alkama & Raúl Abad Viñas & Katherine Calvin & Guido Ceccherin, 2021. "Critical adjustment of land mitigation pathways for assessing countries’ climate progress," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(5), pages 425-434, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:11:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1038_s41558-021-01033-6
    DOI: 10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-021-01033-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41558-021-01033-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kılkış, Şiir, 2022. "Urban emissions and land use efficiency scenarios towards effective climate mitigation in urban systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz & Janusz Olejnik & Marek Urbaniak & Klaudia Ziemblińska, 2023. "Storing Carbon in Forest Biomass and Wood Products in Poland—Energy and Climate Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-18, August.
    3. KERAMIDAS Kimon & FOSSE Florian & DIAZ VAZQUEZ Ana & DOWLING Paul & GARAFFA Rafael & DESPRÉS Jacques & RUSS Hans Peter & SCHADE Burkhard & SCHMITZ Andreas & SORIA RAMIREZ Antonio & VANDYCK Toon & WEIT, 2021. "Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2021: Advancing towards climate neutrality," JRC Research Reports JRC126767, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Xin Zhao & Bryan K. Mignone & Marshall A. Wise & Haewon C. McJeon, 2024. "Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Yuan Zhang & Zhen Yu & Juan Zhang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and dynamic efficiency decomposition of carbon emission efficiency in the Yellow River Basin," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcli:v:11:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1038_s41558-021-01033-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.