IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nas/journl/v117y2020p31696-31705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical evaluation of Chinese college admissions reforms through a natural experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Chen

    (School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Ming Jiang

    (Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

  • Onur Kesten

    (School of Economics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

College admissions policies affect the educational experiences and labor market outcomes for millions of students each year. In China alone, 10 million high school seniors participate in the National College Entrance Examination to compete for 7 million seats at various universities each year, making this system the largest centralized matching market in the world. The last 20 y have witnessed radical reforms in the Chinese college admissions system, with many provinces moving from a sequential (immediate acceptance) mechanism to some version of the parallel college admissions mechanism, a hybrid between the immediate and deferred acceptance mechanisms. In this study, we use a natural experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of the sequential and parallel mechanisms in motivating student college ranking strategies and providing stable matching outcomes. Using a unique dataset from a province that implemented a partial reform between 2008 and 2009, we find that students list more colleges in their rank-ordered lists, and more prestigious colleges as their top choices, after the province adopts the parallel mechanism in its tier 1 college admissions process. These listing strategies in turn lead to greater stability in matching outcomes, consistent with our theoretical prediction that the parallel mechanism is less manipulable and more stable than the sequential mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Chen & Ming Jiang & Onur Kesten, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of Chinese college admissions reforms through a natural experiment," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(50), pages 31696-31705, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:31696-31705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pnas.org/content/117/50/31696.full
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shanguang Zhao & Aiping Chi & Bingjun Wan & Jian Liang, 2022. "Differential Metabolites and Metabolic Pathways Involved in Aerobic Exercise Improvement of Chronic Fatigue Symptoms in Adolescents Based on Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Afacan, Mustafa Oğuz, 2022. "College admissions with tuition transfers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 400-420.
    3. Parag A. Pathak & Kevin Ren & Camille Terrier, 2021. "From immediate acceptance to deferred acceptance: effects on school admissions and achievement in England," CEP Discussion Papers dp1815, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    4. Chen, Yan & He, YingHua, 2021. "Information acquisition and provision in school choice: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Li, Dai & Wang, Yizhen & Li, Lantian, 2023. "Educational choice has greater effects on sex ratios of college STEM majors than has the greater male variance in general intelligence (g)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:31696-31705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eric Cain (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.pnas.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.