IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2011059070447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to development of the innovation potential in the small and medium-sized enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Tabas

    (Ústav podnikové ekonomiky Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

  • Michaela Beranová

    (Ústav podnikové ekonomiky Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

  • Jan Vavřina

    (Ústav podnikové ekonomiky Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

Abstract

It is a common fact, that innovations are the necessary prerequisite of economic development. With regard to the gradual globalization of the world economy, it is obvious that the strategic objectives of every country are directed to own economic wealth which is lead especially by the small and medium-sized enterprises. Due to the fact that these business entities are creating the most of economic growth of every country, the necessity of research, support and development of their innovation potential is obvious. The last and also the least that one could starve for is the building up the barriers to innovativeness of domestic companies, and to decrease competitiveness of the country.In the paper, the authors are focused on the determination of barriers to innovation potential of small and medium-sized enterprises. For this reason, the secondary research of recent studies on innovation barriers has been elaborated. Subsequently, the primary research has been realized on the statistical sample of 173 SMEs. Based on the data analyses, the authors have proved four statistical interactions between innovation potential and factors which stand as barriers to innovation potential development.This paper is based on the confrontation of outcomes of primary research with the secondary research on world-wide perceived barriers to innovations. Data obtained from the primary research had mostly the qualitative and categorical character. Due to this fact, especially Chi-square Test, normalized Pearson coefficient of contingence and Chuprov's coefficient have been applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Tabas & Michaela Beranová & Jan Vavřina, 2011. "Barriers to development of the innovation potential in the small and medium-sized enterprises," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 447-458.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070447
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070447.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070447.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201159070447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vossen, Robert W., 1998. "Combining small and large firm advantages in innovation: theory and examples," Research Report 98B21, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    2. Mohnen, Pierre & Roller, Lars-Hendrik, 2005. "Complementarities in innovation policy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 1431-1450, August.
    3. Hilkevics, Sergejs & Stefenberga, Dace, 2010. "Business Functions Approach To Innovative And Non-Innovative Business Comparison In Latvia," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 5(2), pages 1-3, July.
    4. Giedraitis, Vincentas Rolandas & Rasteniene, Ausra, 2009. "Crisis as a catalyst: the role of Schumpeterian innovation in the Lithuanian economy," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 2, pages 1-3, October.
    5. Tiwari, Rajnish & Buse, Stephan, 2007. "Barriers to innovation in SMEs: Can the internationalization of R&D mitigate their effects?," Working Papers 50, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    6. Krzysztof Janasz, 2010. "Capital And Financing Innovation Processes In Enterprises In Poland: Selected Aspects," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 4(1), pages 26-28, February.
    7. Tejinder, Sara, 2010. "Role of innovation in growth of countries," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 4(1), pages 1-3, February.
    8. Baldwin, John & Lin, Zhengxi, 2002. "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Sebestyen, Tamas & Parag, Andrea, 2010. "The dynamics of link formation in patent innovator networks," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 4(1), pages 1-5, February.
    10. Galia, Fabrice & Legros, Diego, 2004. "Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1185-1199, October.
    11. Sara Tejinder, 2010. "Role Of Innovation In Growth Of Countries," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 4(1), pages 15-17, February.
    12. repec:dgr:rugsom:98b21 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Nazarova, Rano, 2009. "Management of innovative activity under economic and financial changes," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 2, pages 1-2, October.
    14. Statty Stattev & Mariana Kotzeva & Stela Raleva, 2010. "Barriers And Future Policy Directions To Knowledge Demand And Absorption In South And East Bulgaria," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 5(2), pages 7-13, June.
    15. Amnon Frenkel, 2003. "Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 115-137, March.
    16. John R. Baldwin & Guy Gellatly, 2003. "Innovation Strategies and Performance in Small Firms," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3062.
    17. John Storey, 2000. "The Management Of Innovation Problem," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 347-369.
    18. Nola Hewitt-Dundas, 2006. "Resource and Capability Constraints to Innovation in Small and Large Plants," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 257-277, April.
    19. Aneta Sokol, 2011. "A Technology Park As An Institution That Supports Transfer Of Innovation And Knowledge To The Sme Sector Companies," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 7(1), pages 35-39, January.
    20. Martinez, Marian Garcia & Briz, Julian, 2000. "Innovation In The Spanish Food And Drink Industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22.
    21. Silva, Maria & Leitão, João & Raposo, Mário, 2007. "Barriers to Innovation faced by Manufacturing Firms in Portugal: How to overcome it?," MPRA Paper 5408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    22. Zeibote, Zane, 2009. "Stimulation of innovations: case of the Latvian IT cluster," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 2, pages 1-4, October.
    23. Zane Zeibote, 2009. "Stimulation Of Innovations:Case Of The Latvian It Cluster," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 2(2), pages 7-10.
    24. Sokol, Aneta, 2011. "A technology park as an institution that supports transfer of innovation and knowledge to the SME sector companies," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 7(1), pages 1-5, January.
    25. Sergejs Hilkevics & Dace Stefenberga, 2010. "Business Functions Approach To Innovative And Non-Innovative Business Comparison In Latvia," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 5(2), pages 14-16, June.
    26. Audley Genus & Anne-Marie Coles, 2006. "Firm Strategies For Risk Management In Innovation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(02), pages 113-126.
    27. Janasz, Krzysztof, 2010. "Capital and financing innovation processes in enterprises in Poland: selected aspects," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 4(1), pages 1-3, February.
    28. Rano Nazarova, 2009. "Management Of Innovative Activity Under Economic And Financial Changes," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 2(2), pages 18-19.
    29. Tudor, Florin, 2010. "The minimis aid, a possible alternative for supplementing the budgets of SMEes for enhancing competitiveness through the capacity of innovation - the Romanian case," Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 4(1), pages 1-4, February.
    30. Florin Tudor, 2010. "The Minimis Aid, A Possible Alternative For Supplementing The Budgets Of Smes For Enhancing Competitiveness Through The Capacity Of Innovation-The Romanian Case," Perspectives of Innovation in Economics and Business (PIEB), Prague Development Center, vol. 4(1), pages 45-48, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Radek Jurčík, 2013. "Collaborative defence procurement in the European Union and in the Czech Republic - business principle leading more effectiveness of public expenditure in the field of defence," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(7), pages 2249-2253.
    2. Jakub Tabas & Michaela Beranová, 2016. "Innovations' Survival," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(4), pages 1393-1399.
    3. Daniel Olah & B. Levente Alpek, 2021. "The theoretical model of spatial production for innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    4. Jakub Tabas & Michaela Beranová & Josef Polák, 2012. "Evaluation of innovation processes," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 523-532.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Olah & B. Levente Alpek, 2021. "The theoretical model of spatial production for innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Arnaud Le Van, 2020. "Les barrières pour le développement de produits verts et la rentabilité des PME vietnamiennes," Working Papers hal-02482057, HAL.
    3. Arif Hartono & Ratih Kusumawardhani, 2019. "Innovation Barriers and Their Impact on Innovation: Evidence from Indonesian Manufacturing Firms," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1196-1213, October.
    4. Tran Thi Bach Yen & Le Binh Minh & Tran Thu Huong, 2019. "Analyzing the Barriers to Innovation Development in Emerging Economies: Vietnamese Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) as an Empirical Case," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 64-77, January.
    5. Mohieddine Rahmouni, 2014. "Perception des obstacles aux activités d'innovation dans les entreprises tunisiennes," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 22(3), pages 69-98.
    6. Corchuelo Martínez-Azúa, Beatriz & Ferreiro Seoane , Francisco J., 2019. "Agri-food industry in Extremadura: obstacles to innovation, willingness to innovate, and demanded public actions," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 45, pages 181-199.
    7. Vicente Salas-Fumás & Javier Ortiz, 2019. "Innovations’ Success and Failure in the Business Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Thomä, Jörg, 2017. "DUI mode learning and barriers to innovation—A case from Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1327-1339.
    9. Leoncini, Riccardo, 2016. "Learning-by-failing. An empirical exercise on CIS data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 376-386.
    10. D'Este,Pablo & Rentocchini,Francesco & Vega Jurado,Jaider M., 2012. "The role of human capital in lowering barriers to engage in innovation: evidence from the Spanish innovation survey," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201206, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV), revised 03 Aug 2012.
    11. Thomä, Jörg, 2017. "DUI mode learning and barriers to innovation - the case of Germany," ifh Working Papers 7 (2017), Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh).
    12. Simona Iammarino & Francesca Sanna-Randaccio & Maria Savona, 2007. "The perception of obstacles to innovation. Multinational and domestic firms in Italy," Working Papers of BETA 2007-12, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    13. Zahler, Andrés & Goya, Daniel & Caamaño, Matías, 2022. "The primacy of demand and financial obstacles in hindering innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Pereira Cabral, Bernardo & Lage de Sousa, Filipe & Canêdo-Pinheiro, Mauricio, 2020. "Assessing the impacts of innovation barriers: a qualitative analysis of Brazil's natural resources industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2015. "Barriers to innovation: can firm age help lower them?," Working Papers 2015/3, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    16. Gabriele Pellegrino, 2018. "Barriers to innovation in young and mature firms," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 181-206, January.
    17. Pier Francesco Asso & Vito Pipitone, 2013. "Ostacoli e determinanti dell’innovazione: un’analisi sulle imprese siciliane di successo," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, issue 3, pages 157-193, July-Sept.
    18. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2013. "Does the analysis of innovation barriers perceived by high growth firms provide information on innovation policy priorities?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1450-1468.
    19. Luisa Gagliardi & Simona Iammarino, 2017. "Innovation in risky markets. Multinational and domestic firms in the UK regions," Working Papers 37, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Mar 2017.
    20. Hölzl, Werner & Janger, Jürgen, 2014. "Distance to the frontier and the perception of innovation barriers across European countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 707-725.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.