IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mup/actaun/actaun_2011059070403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lease revenue reporting on the side of lessor in connection with transfer of right to use assets (RTU) to lessee

Author

Listed:
  • Patrik Svoboda

    (Ústav účetnictví a daní, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika)

Abstract

The paper analyzed some of the approaches whose application is eligible for the recording of lease contracts on the side of lessor so that this recording display as closely as possible the essence of the lease relationship and at the same time it would be symmetrical to the way of recording on the side of lessee resulting not from value of transferred physical assets but from the evaluated right to use this asset. Impacts of individual variants of approaches into the income statement and statement of financial position are analyzed. It turns out that apparently it is not possible to apply only one approach (as it is in the case of lessee), without gross distortion of the financial position of the lessor. Some of the options of derecognition approach truly shows the situation, especially in long-term leases and leases where the risks and rewards associated with the lease are transferred to the lessee, for the other leases it is recommended sometimes to use underecognition property from the assets of the lessor during the lease period, but rather report a liability to leave to lessee to use (performance obligations approach). Compared with the current method of recording an operating lease, this approach without taking into account the cost of maintenance leads to another course of reporting profits (rise in the early stages against the growth in the final stages), but also brings a more fundamental problem, and it is overvaluation of lessor's assets. In addition, it is possible to doubt about the correctness to report such liability as an unconditional liability. The approach is also not consistent with the IASB and the FASB project that is devoted to the recognition of revenues. The possible way, according to author's opinion, might be regulation of existing model of reporting operating lease or derecognition approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrik Svoboda, 2011. "Lease revenue reporting on the side of lessor in connection with transfer of right to use assets (RTU) to lessee," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 403-414.
    • Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070403
    DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070403.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201159070403.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11118/actaun201159070403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ely, Km, 1995. "Operating Lease Accounting And The Markets Assessment Of Equity Risk," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 397-415.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kusano, Masaki, 2018. "Effect of capitalizing operating leases on credit ratings: Evidence from Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 45-56.
    2. Hsieh, Su-Jane & Liu, Shuming, 2021. "The cost-of-equity implications of off-balance sheet pension liabilities," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    3. Nafiz Fahad & Tom Scott, 2022. "The Impact of Lessee and Lessor Accounting in Local Councils," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 388-395, September.
    4. Sylvain Durocher, 2008. "Canadian Evidence on the Constructive Capitalization of Operating Leases," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 227-256, August.
    5. Kusano, Masaki, 2020. "Does recognition versus disclosure affect risk relevance? Evidence from finance leases in Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    6. Robert Libby & Mark W. Nelson & James E. Hunton, 2006. "Retracted: Recognition v. Disclosure, Auditor Tolerance for Misstatement, and the Reliability of Stock‐Compensation and Lease Information," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 533-560, June.
    7. Dean Hanlon, 2019. "Mandatory accounting change and debt covenant violation: Additional evidence from SFAS 150," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 355-387, August.
    8. Preetika Joshi & Edmund Outslay & Anh Persson & Terry Shevlin & Aruhn Venkat, 2020. "Does Public Country‐by‐Country Reporting Deter Tax Avoidance and Income Shifting? Evidence from the European Banking Industry," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2357-2397, December.
    9. Graham, Roger C. & King, Raymond D., 2013. "Decision usefulness of whole-asset operating lease capitalizations," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 60-73.
    10. Ling Chu & Robert Mathieu & Chima Mbagwu, 2013. "Audit Quality and Banks' Assessment of Disclosed Accounting Information," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 719-738, December.
    11. Elizabeth Blankespoor, 2019. "The Impact of Information Processing Costs on Firm Disclosure Choice: Evidence from the XBRL Mandate," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 919-967, September.
    12. Donald C. Hambrick & Stephen E. Humphrey & Abhinav Gupta, 2015. "Structural interdependence within top management teams: A key moderator of upper echelons predictions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 449-461, March.
    13. Marco Sorrentino & Margherita Smarra & Massimiliano Farina Briamonte, 2021. "Lease Accounting: Back into the Past—A General Review of Different Theoretical Approaches," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(2), pages 136-136, July.
    14. Cucagna, Maria Emilia & Goldsmith, Peter D., 2018. "Value Adding in the Agri-Food Value Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(3), February.
    15. Figen Gunes Dogan, 2016. "Non†cancellable Operating Leases and Operating Leverage," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 22(4), pages 576-612, September.
    16. Chen, Ciao-Wei & Correia, Maria & Urcan, Oktay, 2023. "Accounting for leases and corporate investment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117182, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Nafiz Fahad & Tom Scott, 2022. "The Effect of Capitalising Operating Leases On Charities," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 141-148, March.
    18. Tim V. Eaton & Craig Nichols & James Wahlen & Matthew Wieland, 2021. "Managers’ Investment Decisions: Incentives and Economic Consequences Arising from Leases," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-33, April.
    19. Kim, Tae-Nyun & Xie, Yutong, 2023. "Off-balance sheet disclosure and leverage adjustment speed," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    20. Joseph D. Piotroski, 2007. "Discussion of The Book‐to‐Price Effect in Stock Returns: Accounting for Leverage," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 469-479, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2011059070403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mendelu.cz/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.