IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v15y2021i2p136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lease Accounting: Back into the Past—A General Review of Different Theoretical Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Sorrentino
  • Margherita Smarra
  • Massimiliano Farina Briamonte

Abstract

Purpose – For better mapping the path of lease accounting research, the purpose of this paper is to offer a general review of the existing different ways accounting literature has framed leasing operations in the book-keeping model and, especially, in the accounting equation. Design/methodology/approach – The literature reviewed consists of all the studies published in accounting academic journals available in the database ‘Business Source Premier’ from 1950 to July 2016 and presenting the word ‘lease’ or ‘leasing’ in the title, and the term ‘accounting’ in the main text. Findings – The research has proved that while there is an overall agreement that, for accounting purposes, leasing has to be considered in the wider category of executory contracts, three main different theoretical approaches can be distinguished in literature- (i) the property right view; (ii) the firm commitment approach; and (iii) the risk and rewards approach. Originality/value – In order to fill the gap found in the literature and the non-existence of a study clarifying the main positions concerning the theoretical interpretation and the consequent accounting recognition of leasing in its predominantly financial and trilateral configuration, this paper makes an original contribution to the lease accounting research- providing a first organic reconstruction of the main academic studies dealing with this specific issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Sorrentino & Margherita Smarra & Massimiliano Farina Briamonte, 2021. "Lease Accounting: Back into the Past—A General Review of Different Theoretical Approaches," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(2), pages 136-136, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/41875/43523
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/41875
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ely, Km, 1995. "Operating Lease Accounting And The Markets Assessment Of Equity Risk," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 397-415.
    2. Beattie, Vivien & Goodacre, Alan & Thomson, Sarah, 2000. "Operating leases and the assessment of lease-debt substitutability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 427-470, March.
    3. Brian Booth, 2003. "The Conceptual Framework as a Coherent System for the Development of Accounting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 310-324, October.
    4. Vivien Beattie & Keith Edwards & Alan Goodacre, 1998. "The impact of constructive operating lease capitalisation on key accounting ratios," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 233-254.
    5. Elisabetta Barone & Jacqueline Birt & Soledad Moya, 2014. "Lease Accounting: A Review of Recent Literature," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 35-54, June.
    6. Vatter, Wj, 1966. "Accounting For Leases," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 133-148.
    7. Sylvain Durocher, 2008. "Canadian Evidence on the Constructive Capitalization of Operating Leases," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 227-256, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Morales-Díaz & Constancio Zamora-Ramírez, 2018. "The Impact of IFRS 16 on Key Financial Ratios: A New Methodological Approach," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 105-133, January.
    2. Nafiz Fahad & Tom Scott, 2022. "The Impact of Lessee and Lessor Accounting in Local Councils," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 388-395, September.
    3. Nafiz Fahad & Tom Scott, 2022. "The Effect of Capitalising Operating Leases On Charities," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 141-148, March.
    4. Białek-Jaworska Anna & Dobroszek Justyna & Szatkowska Paulina, 2022. "Does the IFRS 16 affect the key ratios of listed companies? Evidence from Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 58(3), pages 299-315, September.
    5. Kusano, Masaki, 2018. "Effect of capitalizing operating leases on credit ratings: Evidence from Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 45-56.
    6. Kusano, Masaki & Sakuma, Yoshihiro & Tsunogaya, Noriyuki, 2016. "Economic consequences of changes in the lease accounting standard: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 73-88.
    7. Hana Bohušová, 2015. "Is Capitalization of Operating Lease Way to Increase of Comparability of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with IFRS and US GAAP?," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(2), pages 507-514.
    8. Tommaso Fabi & Enrico Laghi & Marco Mattei & Alessandro Sura, 2014. "Comparing the effects of IASB Proposal on leasing: an impact assessment of EU listed Companies," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2-3-4), pages 17-57.
    9. Sylvain Durocher, 2008. "Canadian Evidence on the Constructive Capitalization of Operating Leases," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 227-256, August.
    10. Kusano, Masaki, 2020. "Does recognition versus disclosure affect risk relevance? Evidence from finance leases in Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    11. Graham, Roger C. & King, Raymond D., 2013. "Decision usefulness of whole-asset operating lease capitalizations," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 60-73.
    12. Stefania Cosci & Roberto Guida & Valentina Meliciani, 2015. "Leasing Decisions and Credit Constraints: Empirical Analysis on a Sample of Italian Firms," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 21(2), pages 377-398, March.
    13. Diamant, Olga, 2010. "Leasing und bilanzpolitische Motive," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 8(2), pages 7-32.
    14. Ron van Kints, R.E.G.A. & Louis Spoor, L.L., 2019. "Leases on balance, a level playing field?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 3-9.
    15. Kusano, Masaki & Sakuma, Yoshihiro, 2019. "Effects of recognition versus disclosure of finance leases on audit fees and costs: Evidence from Japan," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 53-68.
    16. Rey, Andrea & Maglio, Roberto & Rapone, Valerio, 2020. "Lobbying during IASB and FASB convergence due processes: Evidence from the IFRS 16 project on leases," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    17. Sylvain Durocher & Anne Fortin, 2009. "Proposed Changes in Lease Accounting and Private Business Bankers' Credit Decisions," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 9-42, February.
    18. Alessandro Mechelli & Riccardo Cimini, 2021. "The effect of corporate governance and investor protection environments on the value relevance of new accounting standards: the case of IFRS 9 and IAS 39," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(4), pages 1241-1266, December.
    19. Beattie, Vivien & Goodacre, Alan & Thomson, Sarah, 2000. "Operating leases and the assessment of lease-debt substitutability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 427-470, March.
    20. Steinar Sars Kvifte, 2008. "Revisiting the Concepts: Time to Challenge the Asset-Liability View," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(1), pages 81-92, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.