IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/jeijnl/v5y2019i2p112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual Language Program Models and English Language Learners: An Analysis of the Literacy Results from a 50/50 and a 90/10 Model in Two California Schools

Author

Listed:
  • Jatnna Acosta
  • John Williams III
  • Brittany Hunt

Abstract

This paper examines the literacy results of English language learners (ELLs) in two California schools following either the 50/50 or the 90/10 dual language (DL) program model. The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of dual language programs with an analysis of two schools’ websites and literacy assessment data in order to determine the effectiveness of each program model in establishing strong foundational literacy skills and fostering the prolonged academic success of ELLs. California provides various options for the bilingual education of its increasing immigrant population. Under the umbrella of bilingual education, dual language programs aim to provide students with instruction in two languages which will allow them to become fully bilingual and develop biliteracy skills. The intended purpose of biliteracy is for students to demonstrate reading and writing proficiency in both instructional languages. Although California implements a variety of dual language program models, this paper provides an overview and comparison of the 50/50 and 90/10 models as they are implemented in two California schools with similar demographics. This paper provides an analysis of the English Language Arts/literacy results of ELLs under both program models as depicted on the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress to determine which model is most effective in its literacy instruction of language minority students. The findings indicate that ELLs demonstrate higher levels of literacy proficiency under the 90/10 program model. These findings have implications for native language proficiency and the preservation of the mother tongue.

Suggested Citation

  • Jatnna Acosta & John Williams III & Brittany Hunt, 2019. "Dual Language Program Models and English Language Learners: An Analysis of the Literacy Results from a 50/50 and a 90/10 Model in Two California Schools," Journal of Educational Issues, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(2), pages 112-112, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:5:y:2019:i:2:p:112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/download/14747/11868
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jei/article/view/14747
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Gibson, 2016. "Bridging English Language Learner Achievement Gaps through Effective Vocabulary Development Strategies," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(9), pages 134-134, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gail August, 2018. "Experimenting With Academic ESL: An ESL/Sociology Link," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-33, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:jeijnl:v:5:y:2019:i:2:p:112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jei.macrothink.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.