IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v3y2013i1p212-226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marx¡¯s Labor Theory of Value. Misleading or Truth?

Author

Listed:
  • Gennady Bilych

Abstract

As once noted by Hicks, an economist¡¯s suggestions and recommendations depend on his or her social values and ideological beliefs. But this is not how it should be. Economic science should be the same for liberals, socialists, nationalists, Christians and pagans. I believe that a person¡¯s economic viewpoints and ideological beliefs are, to a large extent, defined by their attitude towards profit. Marxists believe that profit is the unpaid labour of an employee. For liberals profit is the rightful reward of such a specific factor of production as ¡°entrepreneurial talent¡± and serves as compensation for efficient use of resources. Followers of Keynes and others in favour of state regulation assume an intermediate or middle position between Marxists and liberals. They believe that profit does not always end up in the most deserving hands and so under certain circumstances government officials may restrict the freedom of entrepreneurs and in doing so promote a more equitable distribution of profit. The opinions of economists and their recommendations will continue to differ until there is a definite answer to the question ¨C What is profit? This essay is an attempt to answer this question and I hope that it will help to iron out contradictions between the supporters of different ideologies and political beliefs.

Suggested Citation

  • Gennady Bilych, 2013. "Marx¡¯s Labor Theory of Value. Misleading or Truth?," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 212-226, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:212-226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/3259/2873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/3259
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Brown & Armin Falk & Ernst Fehr, "undated". "Contractual Incompleteness and the Nature of Market Interactions," IEW - Working Papers 038, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    2. Chirinko, Robert S. & Fazzari, Steven M. & Meyer, Andrew P., 1999. "How responsive is business capital formation to its user cost?: An exploration with micro data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 53-80, October.
    3. Duncan K. Foley, 2000. "Recent Developments in the Labor Theory of Value," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 1-39, March.
    4. Rosés, Joan R., 2003. "Wages and labor income in history : a survey," IFCS - Working Papers in Economic History.WH wh031006, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Instituto Figuerola.
    5. Gennady Bilych, 2012. "Profit and Economic Growth," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 68-92, December.
    6. Jesus Felipe, 2001. "Aggregate Production Functions and the Measurement of Infrastructure Productivity: A Reassessment," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 27(3), pages 323-344, Summer.
    7. Rainer Klump & Peter McAdam & Alpo Willman, 2012. "The Normalized Ces Production Function: Theory And Empirics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 769-799, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federici, Daniela & Saltari, Enrico, 2018. "Elasticity Of Substitution And Technical Progress: Is There A Misspecification Problem?," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 101-121, January.
    2. Keting Shen & Jing Wang & John Whalley, 2015. "Measuring Changes in the Bilateral Technology Gaps between China, India and the U.S. 1979 - 2008," NBER Working Papers 21657, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Judzik, Dario & Sala, Hector, 2015. "The determinants of capital intensity in Japan and the US," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 78-98.
    4. Gennady Bilych, 2013. "What Is There in Common between Arab Revolutions and the Coase Theorem?," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 126-152, June.
    5. Shen, Keting & Wang, Jing & Whalley, John, 2016. "Measuring Changes in the Bilateral Technology Gaps between China, India and the U.S. 1979 - 2008," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 261, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    6. Cécile Batisse & Nathalie Eyckmans & Olivier Meunier & Michel Mignolet, 2005. "Regional policy between efficacy and cohesion," ERSA conference papers ersa05p638, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Dongya Koh & Raül Santaeulàlia-Llopis, 2017. "Countercyclical Elasticity of Substitution," Working Papers 946, Barcelona School of Economics.
    8. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2016_016 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Puspa Kandel Ph.D., 2001. "Corporate Tax in Nepal: Effective Burden (1975-2000)," NRB Economic Review, Nepal Rastra Bank, Research Department, vol. 13, pages 66-81, April.
    10. Trenczek, Jan & Wacker, Konstantin M., 2023. "Human Capital Misallocation and Output per Worker Differences: Beyond Cobb-Douglas," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1331, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Arslan Majeed & Shahid Mansoor Hashmi & Romila Qamar, 2017. "Monetary Policy Transmission and Firms’ Investment: Evidence From the Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 20(66), pages 2-34, December.
    12. Giuseppe Cinquegrana, 2014. "Effetti differenziali delle politiche monetarie sugli investimenti delle imprese industriali italiane: un?analisi con metodologia panel," RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 40-78.
    13. Yang Li & Yuanzhu Wang & Rajah Rasiah, 2023. "Research on the Influence of Tax Incentives and Financing Constraints on NEEQ Enterprises’ Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    14. A. Kamaletdinov Sh. & A. Ksenofontov A. & А. Камалетдинов Ш. & А. Ксенофонтов А., 2018. "Моделирование Доходов Социально-Экономических Систем На Основе Производственной Функции // Modeling Of Income Of Socio-Economic Systems On The Basis Of The Production Function," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 22(1), pages 118-127.
    15. Growiec, Jakub, 2018. "Factor-specific technology choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-14.
    16. Jennifer C. Gravelle, 2010. "Corporate Tax Incidence: Review of General Equilibrium Estimates and Analysis: Working Paper 2010-03," Working Papers 21486, Congressional Budget Office.
    17. Takuma Kunieda & Akihisa Shibata, 2024. "Insurance against Aggregate Shocks," KIER Working Papers 1102, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    18. Berger, Johannes & Strohner, Ludwig, 2020. "Documentation of the PUblic Policy Model for Austria and other European countries (PUMA)," Research Papers 11, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Jacques Mairesse & Bronwyn H. Hall & Benoît Mulkay, 1999. "Firm-Level Investment in France and the United States: An Exploration of What We Have Learned in Twenty Years," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 55-56, pages 27-67.
    20. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2015. "The Rise and Decline of General Laws of Capitalism," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 3-28, Winter.
    21. Serhan Cevik & Fedor Miryugin, 2022. "Death and taxes: Does taxation matter for firm survival?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 92-112, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marx`s Labor Theory of Value; Profit; Capital;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:212-226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.