IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mof/journl/ppr16_05_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics Between Multilateralism and Regionalism in Relation to Trade Liberalization and Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Satoshi Kodera

    (Professor, Faculty of Law, Seinan Gakuin University)

Abstract

This paper revisits the conflict of trade liberalization and culture, both of which are basic values or interests, from the viewpoint of the relationship between multilateralism and regionalism. By doing so, this paper clarifies the relationship between multilateralism and regionalism, two forces that govern international economic relationships. For this purpose, this paper analyzes the relationship between trade liberalization and culture as divided into three phases. First, this paper looks at this relationship within the framework of multilateralism as embodied by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), mainly with respect to the Uruguay Round of negotiations. Second, it examines the relationship of tension between two organizations embodying multilateralism, namely, the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Third, this paper looks at the transition from multilateralism to regionalism, which is epitomized by the implementation of the protocol on cultural cooperation by the EU. As a result of the analysis of these three phases, it becomes clear that between trade liberalization and culture, there is not only a relationship of conflict as exemplified by a shift of regionalism toward multilateralism, the fragmentation of multilateralism, and a shift of multilateralism toward regionalism, but also a dynamic and complementary relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Satoshi Kodera, 2020. "Dynamics Between Multilateralism and Regionalism in Relation to Trade Liberalization and Culture," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_05_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mof.go.jp/english/pri/publication/pp_review/ppr16_05_03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh,J. P., 2008. "Negotiation and the Global Information Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521731089.
    2. Singh,J. P., 2008. "Negotiation and the Global Information Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521515313.
    3. Voon,Tania, 2007. "Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521873277.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Hosman, 2009. "Dividing the Oils: Dynamic Bargaining as Policy Formation in the Nigerian Petroleum Industry," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(5), pages 609-632, September.
    2. Roy, Martin, 2010. "Endowments, power, and democracy: Political economy of multilateral commitments on trade in services," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2010-11, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    3. J. Singh, 2009. "Tania Voon, Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 33(2), pages 161-165, May.
    4. Singh, J.P. & Flyverbom, Mikkel, 2016. "Representing participation in ICT4D projects," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 692-703.
    5. Pager Sean A., 2017. "The Role of Copyright in Creative Industry Development," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 521-576, October.
    6. Luhui Hua & Zeeshan Rasool & Muhammad Akbar Ali Ansari & Ali Junaid Khan & Nadia Hanif & Waseem Ul Hameed, 2023. "International Students’ Nostalgic Behaviour towards the Purchase of Products and Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Dongchul Kwak & Minjung Kim, 2020. "Trade Negotiations in the Digital Era: The Case of OTT Video Streaming Services," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S2), pages 14-22, June.
    8. Tania Sharmin Jahan, 2013. "Is There a Linkage Between Sustainable Development and Market Access of LDCs?," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 143-223, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    WTO; Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions; UNESCO; regionalism; multilateralism; FTA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr16_05_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Policy Research Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/prigvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.