IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v26y2009i5p609-632.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dividing the Oils: Dynamic Bargaining as Policy Formation in the Nigerian Petroleum Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Hosman

Abstract

In academic studies of the interface between developing countries and large multinational oil corporations, scholars have noted that over time and through repeated interaction, the developing countries tend to negotiate better outcomes for themselves: they progress along a learning curve by incrementally improving their outcomes through bargaining and strategic interaction. This phenomenon can be demonstrated in a number of oil‐rich developing countries. Nigeria's case, however, is more complex. During the two decades following its independence, the state successfully negotiated for more control over—made strides in the developing of the skills necessary to manage—its petroleum industry, as our model would predict. Then, in a puzzling late‐1970s‐to‐mid‐1980s change of course, the government abruptly gave back concessions, undermined local entrepreneurial endeavors, and repealed indigenization laws. This paper combines, in the analytic narrative tradition, the case study method with an extensive form game; it applies a dynamic bargaining model to Nigeria's historical experience, demonstrating that Nigeria improved its outcomes and ascended along the “bargaining learning curve,” only to reverse policy and “unlearn,” with serious consequences for the Nigerian population. Even so, the demonstration of both successful and improved outcomes in past negotiations give evidence that Nigeria could once again ascend its bargaining learning curve if the government were to re‐commit to such a policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Hosman, 2009. "Dividing the Oils: Dynamic Bargaining as Policy Formation in the Nigerian Petroleum Industry," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(5), pages 609-632, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:5:p:609-632
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00408.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00408.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00408.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh,J. P., 2008. "Negotiation and the Global Information Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521731089, October.
    2. Singh,J. P., 2008. "Negotiation and the Global Information Economy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521515313, October.
    3. Thomas J. Biersteker, 1980. "The Illusion of State Power: Transnational Corporations and the Neutralization of Host-Country Legislation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 17(3), pages 207-221, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soni, Vivek & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Sharma, Sunil & Das, Debadyuti, 2023. "Negotiating oil and gas resource ownership for equitable sharing: A problematization approach and evidence from India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    2. Vivoda Vlado, 2011. "Bargaining Model for the International Oil Industry," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-36, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roy, Martin, 2010. "Endowments, power, and democracy: Political economy of multilateral commitments on trade in services," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2010-11, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. J. Singh, 2009. "Tania Voon, Cultural Products and the World Trade Organization," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 33(2), pages 161-165, May.
    3. Singh, J.P. & Flyverbom, Mikkel, 2016. "Representing participation in ICT4D projects," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 692-703.
    4. Satoshi Kodera, 2020. "Dynamics Between Multilateralism and Regionalism in Relation to Trade Liberalization and Culture," Public Policy Review, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Evaristus Oshionebo, 2018. "Corporations and Nations: Power Imbalance in the Extractive Sector," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 419-446, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:5:p:609-632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.