IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v4y2014i1p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishing an Interest-Free Lending Platform Applying Optimum Premium, Mesbah Point, in Amortization and Time Value of Money

Author

Listed:
  • Amir BehnamIzadyar

    (Darulmaali Financial Consulting Group LLC, United States)

  • Feroza Ragnath

    (Darulmaali Financial Consulting Group LLC, United States)

Abstract

The concept of Interest has been viewed as a forbidden instrument in Islamic investments. This study has focused on establishing an interest-free platform, and introducing a new method of direct-to-consumer financing using the amortization and the time value of money. Based on this method, the borrower makes a pre-determined amount of upfront payment in order to receive zero percent interest rate financing and only makes monthly principal payments during the term of the loan. Using the same interest rate and the same term period as in amortization, the total amount of interest occurring during the amortized loan is replaced as future value and the discounted value is calculated as the amount of upfront payment. The relationship between the amount of upfront payment in each range of 30,20,15,10 and 5 year terms and the interest rates 1%-30% shows a parabolic pattern in each term, in which the amount of upfront payment will increase to a pivotal level in each term and will decrease as the interest rate increases. The vertex point of the parabola is named Mesbah Point in order to distinguish this conceptual point. Therefore, Mesbah Point is the optimum amount of upfront payment collected, irrespective of the interest rate, to receive an interest free, zero percent loan. In other words, Mesbah Point is as an interest rate-proof value in which the borrower, regardless of interest rates in the market, can contribute a pre-determined amount of upfront payment to receive an interest free, zero percent interest rate loan.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir BehnamIzadyar & Feroza Ragnath, 2014. "Establishing an Interest-Free Lending Platform Applying Optimum Premium, Mesbah Point, in Amortization and Time Value of Money," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/360/322
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asli Demirguk-Kunt & Thorsten Beck & Ouarda Merrouche, 2013. "Islamic Banking versus Conventional Banking: Business model, Efficiency, and Stability," Post-Print hal-01638080, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mollah, Sabur & Zaman, Mahbub, 2015. "Shari’ah supervision, corporate governance and performance: Conventional vs. Islamic banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 418-435.
    2. Pirgaip, Burak & Arslan-Ayaydin, Özgür & Karan, Mehmet Baha, 2021. "Do Sukuk provide diversification benefits to conventional bond investors? Evidence from Turkey," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    3. Trinugroho, Irwan & Pamungkas, Putra & Ariefianto, Mochammad Doddy & Tarazi, Amine, 2020. "Deposit structure, market discipline, and ownership type: Evidence from Indonesia," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    4. Hassan Belkacem Ghassan & Abdelkrim Ahmed Guendouz, 2019. "Panel modeling of z-score: evidence from Islamic and conventional Saudi banks," International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(3), pages 448-468, July.
    5. Neifar, Malika, 2020. "Interest-free versus Conventional banks- A Comparative Study using Linear and Nonlinear Panel Regression: Empirical Evidence from Turky and 6 MENA countries," MPRA Paper 101028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Anupam Das Gupta & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq, 2020. "Do competition and revenue diversification have significant effect on risk-taking? Empirical evidence from BRICS banks," International Journal of Financial Engineering (IJFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Mohamed Albaity & Ray Saadaoui Mallek & Hasan Mustafa, 2022. "Bank Stock Return Reactions to the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Investor Sentiment in MENA Countries," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Baele, Lieven & Farooq, Moazzam & Ongena, Steven, 2014. "Of religion and redemption: Evidence from default on Islamic loans," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 141-159.
    9. Syed Abul Basher & Lawrence M. Kessler & Murat K. Munkin, 2017. "Bank capital and portfolio risk among Islamic banks," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 1-9, September.
    10. Smaoui, Houcem & Mimouni, Karim & Miniaoui, Héla & Temimi, Akram, 2020. "Funding liquidity risk and banks' risk-taking: Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Kaouther Toumi Lajimi & Rana El Bahsh & Serge Agbodjo, 2017. "The determinants of bank profitability, does Islamic ethics perspective matter ? A comprehensive study on Islamic banks vs. Conventional ones," Post-Print hal-04109833, HAL.
    12. Mohamed E. Chaffai, 2022. "New evidence on Islamic and conventional bank efficiency: A meta‐regression analysis," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 221-246, January.
    13. Belkhir, Mohamed & Grira, Jocelyn & Hassan, M. Kabir & Soumaré, Issouf, 2019. "Islamic banks and political risk: International evidence," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 39-55.
    14. Smaoui, Houcem & Nechi, Salem, 2017. "Does sukuk market development spur economic growth?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 136-147.
    15. Abdelsalam, Omneya & Elnahass, Marwa & Ahmed, Habib & Williams, Julian, 2022. "Asset securitizations and bank stability: Evidence from different banking systems," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Godlewski, Christophe J. & Turk-Ariss, Rima & Weill, Laurent, 2013. "Sukuk vs. conventional bonds: A stock market perspective," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 745-761.
    17. Mohamed, Toka S. & Elgammal, Mohammed M., 2023. "Credit risk in Islamic microfinance institutions: The role of women, groups, and rural borrowers," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    18. Saad Azmat & A. S. M. Sohel Azad & M. Ishaq Bhatti & Hamza Ghaffar, 2020. "Islamic Banking, Costly Religiosity, And Competition," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 43(2), pages 263-303, May.
    19. Burcu Buyuran & Ibrahim Halil Eksi, 2020. "Revenue Diversification and Bank Performance: Evidence from Turkey," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 18(1), pages 7-18.
    20. Imène BERGUIGA & Philippe ADAIR, 2019. "The performance of Islamic banks in the MENA region: Are specific risks a minor attribute?," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 49, pages 5-23.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Kabir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csmirus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.