IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mig/journl/v13y2016i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Naturalisation policies beyond a Western focus

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Schwarz

    (Global South Studies Center, University of Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

Naturalisations do not happen automatically – unlike the acquisition of nationality at birth – but must be brought about deliberately. The varying ways naturalisations are organized in any society therefore offer an opportunity to gain clues as to which criteria are assumed to be relevant for the respective definition of national belonging. This introduction argues that most research on naturalisation still focusses on Western states, and that theories of naturalisation are largely derived from Western cases. It describes the ethnocentric bias of much of the universalizing comparative research on naturalisations, and outlines the main reasons for the lack of research beyond the West. It then presents the articles on naturalisation policies in the Global South brought together in this special issue. The contributions analyse ethnically exclusive nationality laws in Liberia and Israel; selective two-tier regimes of immigrant incorporation in Hong Kong and Singapore; investor citizenship schemes which are much more common in the Global South than in the North, exemplified by the case of Mauritius; and Mexico, whose norms assign naturalised Mexicans the status of “second-class citizens”.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Schwarz, 2016. "Naturalisation policies beyond a Western focus," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.tplondon.com/index.php/ml/article/viewFile/532/444
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew J. Gibney, 2013. "‘A Very Transcendental Power’: Denaturalisation and the Liberalisation of Citizenship in the United Kingdom," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(3), pages 637-655, October.
    2. Jelena Dzankic, 2012. "The pros and cons of ius pecuniae: investor citizenship in comparative perspective," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 14, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    3. Thomas Huddleston, 2013. "The naturalisation procedure: measuring the ordinary obstacles and opportunities for immigrants to become citizens," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers p0370, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    4. Bashford, Alison, 2014. "Immigration restriction: rethinking period and place from settler colonies to postcolonial nations," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 26-48, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Felipe Zegarra, 2020. "Living Costs and Real Wages in Nineteenth Century Lima: Levels and International Comparisons," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 186-219, July.
    2. Owen Parker, 2017. "Commercializing Citizenship in Crisis EU: The Case of Immigrant Investor Programmes," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 332-348, March.
    3. Ramola Ramtohul, 2016. "‘High net worth’ migration in Mauritius: A critical analysis," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 13(1), pages 16-32, January.
    4. Surak, Kristin & Tsuzuki, Yusuke, 2021. "Are golden visas a golden opportunity? Assessing the economic origins and outcomes of residence by investment programmes in the EU," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110458, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Groarke, Sarah & Dunbar, Róisín, 2020. "Pathways to citizenship through naturalisation in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS116.
    6. Elisa Barbiano di Belgiojoso & Livia Elisa Ortensi, 2022. "Who Wants to Become Italian? A Study of Interest in Naturalisation among Foreign Migrants in Italy," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 38(5), pages 1095-1118, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mig:journl:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ML (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.migrationletters.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.