IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgs/ijoied/v9y2023i5p7-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Portuguese Corporate Social Responsibility: Features and Stakeholder Views

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Dieguez

    (Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave (IPCA), Portugal)

  • Paula Loureiro

    (Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave (IPCA), Portugal)

  • Isabel Ferreira

    (Polytechnic University of Cávado and Ave (IPCA), Portugal)

Abstract

Social responsibility has become a key factor in business success, as it can lead to competitive advantages, positive stakeholder relations, and employee satisfaction. This study explores the characteristics of companies that adopt social practices, evaluates innovative social responsibility initiatives in Portuguese companies, and examines the motivations, benefits, and challenges associated with these practices. The study found that most respondents recognize the relevance of social responsibility to company growth, particularly in terms of human capital development. The primary motivations for adopting social practices are to improve employee well-being and satisfaction. The main benefits include proactive positioning in the market, strategic integration of social concerns, and decision-making that aligns with social values. However, challenges such as the absence of direct financial returns, resistance from older workers, resource limitations, and a lack of participation can hinder the implementation of social responsibility initiatives. The article concludes by discussing the study’s limitations and suggesting directions for future research on social responsibility in business.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Dieguez & Paula Loureiro & Isabel Ferreira, 2023. "Portuguese Corporate Social Responsibility: Features and Stakeholder Views," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 9(5), pages 7-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgs:ijoied:v:9:y:2023:i:5:p:7-15
    DOI: 110.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.95.2001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/01_Portuguese-Corporate-Social-Responsibility.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://researchleap.com/portuguese-corporate-social-responsibility-features-and-stakeholder-views/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/110.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.95.2001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abagail McWilliams & Donald S. Siegel & Patrick M. Wright, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Hao Liang & Luc Renneboog, 2017. "On the Foundations of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(2), pages 853-910, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Yechi & Ding, Yibing & Wang, Zilong & Zhang, Wenjing, 2023. "Building trust after pollution emergency: A strategic perspective on corporate social responsibility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Barros, Victor & Verga Matos, Pedro & Miranda Sarmento, Joaquim & Rino Vieira, Pedro, 2022. "M&A activity as a driver for better ESG performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Xiaomeng Chen & Xiao Liang & Hai Wu, 2023. "Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and CSR Performance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 255-288, February.
    4. Junnan Hu & Shujing Wang & Feixue Xie, 2018. "Environmental responsibility, market valuation, and firm characteristics: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1376-1387, November.
    5. Tiago Cruz Gonçalves & Victor Barros & José Vicente Avelar, 2023. "Environmental, social and governance scores in Europe: what drives financial performance for larger firms?," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 121-131.
    6. Hee‐Chan Song, 2020. "Sufficiency economy philosophy: Buddhism‐based sustainability framework in Thailand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 2995-3005, December.
    7. María Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Luis Miralles-Quirós & Jesús Redondo Hernández, 2019. "ESG Performance and Shareholder Value Creation in the Banking Industry: International Differences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Asif Saeed & Ammar Ali Gull & Asad Ali Rind & Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2022. "Do socially responsible firms demand high‐quality audits? An international evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2235-2255, April.
    9. Buchanan, Bonnie G. & Cao, Cathy Xuying & Wang, Shuhui, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility and inside debt: The long game," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei & Ertugrul, Mine & Gao, Lucia Silva, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility, product market perception, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Harjoto, Maretno A. & Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Li, Qian, 2021. "Corporate social irresponsibility and portfolio performance: A cross-national study," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    13. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Keke Song, 2021. "The Role of Ethical Standards in the Relationship Between Religious Social Norms and M&A Announcement Returns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 721-742, May.
    14. Scholtens, Bert, 2008. "A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 46-55, December.
    15. Fang, Mingyue & Nie, Huihua & Shen, Xinyi, 2023. "Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Girardone, Claudia & Kokas, Sotirios & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "Diversity and women in finance: Challenges and future perspectives," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Md. Rabiul Islam & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2019. "Conceptual mapping of shared value creation by the private commercial banks in Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Meyer, Margit & Waßmann, Jan, 2011. "Strategische Corporate Social Responsibility. Konzeptionelle Entwicklung und Implementierung in der Praxis am Beispiel 'dm-drogerie markt'," Research Papers on Marketing Strategy 3/2011, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für BWL und Marketing.
    19. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Jia, Mengyu & Li, Wenqing & Zhao, Xin & Gatto, Andrea & Ma, Xiaowei, 2024. "Higher education or scientific research: Which one contributes more to China's green innovation?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Gallear, David & Ghobadian, Abby & Chen, Weifeng, 2012. "Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 83-91.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social Responsibility; Corporative Social Responsibility; Corporate Social Innovation; Stakeholders; Innovation; Leadership;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgs:ijoied:v:9:y:2023:i:5:p:7-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bojan Obrenovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchleap.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.