IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgs/ijoied/v8y2022i4p42-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Intermediate Community-2 A Behavioral / Bargaining Win-Win-Win Papakonstantinidis Approach for Conflict Resolution and Acceptance at the Local Level

Author

Listed:
  • Leonidas A. Papakonstantinidis

    (Kalamata, GR)

Abstract

The paper explores the Nash’ equilibrium in the bargain, through the disagreement and conflict situations, in the case of the local development process. Special focus is given to the empathy within and during the bargain in the frame of the tripartite win-win-win perception, i.e [identity-social justice, community justice] with the Community in the Role of the “Intermediate”, among bargainers. Social trust and social cohesion conditions (sensitization process) within the Community develop the necessity of building social capital at a local level. That presupposes that the local community builds up a “new local standard,” based on local people’s sensitized instant reflection behaviour. By its turn, sensitized behaviour must be considered in the frame of any “bargain”, between two, taking place inside the Community. “Instrumental rationality” has been proved to be the main obstacle toward the socio-sensitized behaviour in the bargain process. Hence, a scientific dialogue in the socio-philosophical level has been developed on how “instrumental rationality” should co-exist with the “sensitized behaviour” at local levels leading to a “society of citizens.” Thus, the resulted behaviour leads into the absolute cooperation, which steps on the same rules of globalization. The paper, then, argues that this resulted behaviour reflects the end point of the local development process.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonidas A. Papakonstantinidis, 2022. "The Intermediate Community-2 A Behavioral / Bargaining Win-Win-Win Papakonstantinidis Approach for Conflict Resolution and Acceptance at the Local Level," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(4), pages 42-55, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgs:ijoied:v:8:y:2022:i:4:p:42-55
    DOI: 10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.84.2005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/05_The-Intermediate-Community-2-A-Behavioral-Bargaining-Win-Win-Win-Papakonstantinidis-Approach-for-Conflict-Resolution-and-Acceptance-at-the-Local-Level.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://researchleap.com/the-intermediate-community-2-a-behavioral-bargaining-win-win-win-papakonstantinidis-approach-for-conflict-resolution-and-acceptance-at-the-local-level/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18775/ijied.1849-7551-7020.2015.84.2005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert J Aumann, 1999. "Agreeing to Disagree," Levine's Working Paper Archive 512, David K. Levine.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kenneth Kasa, 2000. "Forecasting the Forecasts of Others in the Frequency Domain," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 3(4), pages 726-756, October.
    2. Serrano, Roberto & Volij, Oscar, 2000. "Walrasian Allocations without Price-Taking Behavior," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 79-106, November.
    3. Tarbush, Bassel, 2011. "Generalisation of Samet's (2010) agreement theorem," MPRA Paper 29067, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Giacomo Bonanno & Klaus Nehring, "undated". "Intersubjective Consistency Of Knowledge And Belief," Department of Economics 98-03, California Davis - Department of Economics.
    5. Miklós Pintér, 2005. "A game theoretic application of inverse limit," Game Theory and Information 0503006, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Oct 2005.
    6. Adam, Klaus & Marcet, Albert, 2011. "Internal rationality, imperfect market knowledge and asset prices," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 1224-1252, May.
    7. José Alvaro Rodrigues-Neto, 2012. "Cycles of length two in monotonic models," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2012-587, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    8. Rosenthal, Edward C., 1998. "Information and strategyproofness in joint project selection," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 207-221, May.
    9. Houy, Nicolas & Ménager, Lucie, 2008. "Communication, consensus and order. Who wants to speak first?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 140-152, November.
    10. Berliant, Marcus & Yu, Chia-Ming, 2013. "Rational expectations in urban economics," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 197-208.
    11. Antoine Billot, 2007. "Social consistency and individual rationality," Working Papers halshs-00588078, HAL.
    12. Tsakas, Elias & Voorneveld, Mark, 2011. "On consensus through communication without a commonly known protocol," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 733-739.
    13. Martins-da-Rocha, V. Filipe, 2010. "Interim efficiency with MEU-preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(5), pages 1987-2017, September.
    14. Maskin, Eric & Tirole, Jean, 2001. "Markov Perfect Equilibrium: I. Observable Actions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 191-219, October.
    15. Salonen, Hannu & Nurmi, Hannu, 1999. "A note on rough sets and common knowledge events," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 692-695, February.
    16. Allen, Franklin & Gale, Douglas, 1999. "Diversity of Opinion and Financing of New Technologies," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 8(1-2), pages 68-89, January.
    17. Lo, Kin Chung, 2006. "Agreement and stochastic independence of belief functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-22, January.
    18. Lismont L. & Mongin, P., 1996. "Belief closure: A semantics of common knowledge for modal propositional logic," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 60-60, February.
    19. Zimper, Alexander, 2009. "An epistemic model of an agent who does not reflect on reasoning processes," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 290-309, November.
    20. Lo, Kin Chung, 2009. "Correlated Nash equilibrium," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 722-743, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Intermediate; Community-2; Bargaining; Papakonstantinidis; Local Level;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgs:ijoied:v:8:y:2022:i:4:p:42-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bojan Obrenovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://researchleap.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.