IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/emfitr/v57y2021i13p3792-3817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sukuk and Bond Puzzle: An Analysis with Characteristics Matched Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Sawkat Hossain
  • Md Hamid Uddin
  • Sarkar Humayun Kabir

Abstract

A sukuk is an Islamic financial asset structured to offer investors a cash flow equivalent to that of a bond. The difference between them is in their contractual mechanism: a bond constitutes a lender–borrower relationship between the holders and issuers whereas a sukuk constitutes a lessor-lessee, buyer-seller, or a partnership relationship. Therefore, we examine whether they are different assets in terms of their return and risk profile. Given the difference between them, it is also important to identify what drives sukuk returns. The study finds that sukuk returns are insignificantly different from those of bonds but have significantly higher risk. However, we find that sukuk investors are not sufficiently compensated for the higher risk. Overall, our study finds that sukuks’ market performance is unrelated to bond market performance, but the market performance of the industry in which the sukuk-financed project originates has a significant effect on sukuk performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Sawkat Hossain & Md Hamid Uddin & Sarkar Humayun Kabir, 2021. "Sukuk and Bond Puzzle: An Analysis with Characteristics Matched Portfolios," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(13), pages 3792-3817, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:57:y:2021:i:13:p:3792-3817
    DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1706478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1706478
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1706478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saban Nazlioglu & Shawkat Hammoudeh & Rangan Gupta, 2015. "Volatility transmission between Islamic and conventional equity markets: evidence from causality-in-variance test," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(46), pages 4996-5011, October.
    2. Mara Faccio & Maria-Teresa Marchica & Roberto Mura, 2011. "Large Shareholder Diversification and Corporate Risk-Taking," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(11), pages 3601-3641.
    3. Bashir, B. A., 1983. "Portfolio management of islamic banks : `Certainty model'," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 339-354, September.
    4. Essia Ries Ahmed & Md. Aminul Islam & Tariq Tawfeeq Yousif Alabdullah, 2014. "Islamic Sukuk: Pricing Mechanism and Rating," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(11), pages 640-648.
    5. Godlewski, Christophe J. & Turk-Ariss, Rima & Weill, Laurent, 2013. "Sukuk vs. conventional bonds: A stock market perspective," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 745-761.
    6. Ghysels, Eric & Santa-Clara, Pedro & Valkanov, Rossen, 2005. "There is a risk-return trade-off after all," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 509-548, June.
    7. Essia Ries Ahmed & Md. Aminul Islam & Tariq Tawfeeq Yousif Alabdullah, 2014. "Islamic Sukuk: Pricing Mechanism and Rating," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(11), pages 640-648, November.
    8. Paul‐Olivier Klein & Laurent Weill, 2016. "Why do companies issue sukuk?," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 26-33, November.
    9. Ebrahim, M. Shahid & Jaafar, Aziz & Omar, Fatma A. & Salleh, Murizah Osman, 2016. "Can Islamic injunctions indemnify the structural flaws of securitized debt?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 271-286.
    10. Obiyathulla Ismath Bacha, Abbas Mirakhor, Hossein Askari, 2015. "Risk Sharing in Corporate and Public Finance: The Contribution of Islamic Finance," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 68(274), pages 187-213.
    11. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    12. Muhamed Zulkhibri, 2015. "A synthesis of theoretical and empirical research on sukuk," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 15(4), pages 237-248, December.
    13. Bill Maurer, 2010. "Form versus substance: AAOIFI projects and Islamic fundamentals in the case ofsukuk," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(1), pages 32-41, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shabeer Khan & Niaz Ahmed Bhutto & Uzair Abdullah Khan & Mohd Ziaur Rehman & Wadi B. Alonazi & Abdullah Ludeen, 2022. "Ṣukūk or Bond, Which Is More Sustainable during COVID-19? Global Evidence from the Wavelet Coherence Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Awais Ur Rehman & Saqib Farid & Muhammad Abubakr Naeem, 2022. "The link between corporate governance, corporate social sustainability and credit risk of Islamic bonds," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(12), pages 5990-6014, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Awais Ur Rehman & Saqib Farid & Muhammad Abubakr Naeem, 2022. "The link between corporate governance, corporate social sustainability and credit risk of Islamic bonds," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(12), pages 5990-6014, May.
    2. Ashraf, Dawood & Rizwan, Muhammad Suhail & Azmat, Saad, 2018. "The Role of Ownership and Governance Mechanism in Sukuk Financing by Malaysian Firms: An Application of A Double Selection Model," Working Papers 2018-2, The Islamic Research and Teaching Institute (IRTI).
    3. Nagano, Mamoru, 2017. "Sukuk issuance and information asymmetry: Why do firms issue sukuk?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 142-157.
    4. Khawaja, Mohsin & Bhatti, M. Ishaq & Ashraf, Dawood, 2019. "Ownership and control in a double decision framework for raising capital," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    5. Elnahas, Ahmed M. & Kabir Hassan, M. & Ismail, Ghada M., 2017. "Religion and mergers and acquisitions contracting: The case of earnout agreements," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 221-246.
    6. Ashraf, Dawood & Rizwan, Muhammad Suhail & Azmat, Saad, 2021. "Not one but three decisions in sukuk issuance: Understanding the role of ownership and governance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Md Hamid Uddin & Sarkar H. Kabir & Mohammad Kabir Hassan & Mohammed S. Hossain & Jia Liu, 2022. "Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2210-2234, April.
    8. Paltrinieri, Andrea & Hassan, Mohammad Kabir & Bahoo, Salman & Khan, Ashraf, 2023. "A bibliometric review of sukuk literature," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 897-918.
    9. Mahfuzur Rahman & Che Ruhana Isa & Teng-Tsai Tu & Moniruzzaman Sarker & Md. Abdul Kaium Masud, 2020. "A bibliometric analysis of socially responsible investment sukuk literature," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Narayan, Paresh Kumar & Phan, Dinh Hoang Bach, 2019. "A survey of Islamic banking and finance literature: Issues, challenges and future directions," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 484-496.
    11. Beck, Thorsten & Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli & Merrouche, Ouarda, 2013. "Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 433-447.
    12. Mousa Sharaf Adin Hezam Saleh & Yusnidah Ibrahim & Hanita Kadir Shahar, 2020. "The Simultaneous Effect of Corporate Ownership on Dividends and Capital Structure: Malaysian Evidence," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(6), pages 46-62, December.
    13. Yusuf, Fatima & Yousaf, Amna & Saeed, Abubakr, 2018. "Rethinking agency theory in developing countries: A case study of Pakistan," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 281-292.
    14. Jiang, Tianjiao & Levine, Ross & Lin, Chen & Wei, Lai, 2020. "Bank deregulation and corporate risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    15. Samia Nasreen & Syed Asif Ali Naqvi & Aviral Kumar Tiwari & Shawkat Hammoudeh & Syed Ale Raza Shah, 2020. "A Wavelet-Based Analysis of the Co-Movement between Sukuk Bonds and Shariah Stock Indices in the GCC Region: Implications for Risk Diversification," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Gopalan, Radhakrishnan & Gormley, Todd A. & Kalda, Ankit, 2021. "It’s not so bad: Director bankruptcy experience and corporate risk-taking," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 261-292.
    17. Zeineb Barka & Taher Hamza, 2020. "The effect of large controlling shareholders on equity prices in France: monitoring or entrenchment?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 769-798, September.
    18. Manh Cuong Nguyen & Viet Anh Dang & Tri Tri Nguyen, 2023. "The transfer of risk taking along the supply chain," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1341-1378, November.
    19. Imhof, Michael J. & Seavey, Scott E., 2014. "Corporate risk-taking, firm value and high levels of managerial earnings forecasts," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 328-337.
    20. Paul-Olivier KLEIN, 2017. "Do Shareholders Value Bond Offerings? A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2017-04, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:57:y:2021:i:13:p:3792-3817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MREE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.