IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev3rl/v9y2018i4p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Interactive and Participant Methods: A Postmodern Shift in Political Science Research?

Author

Listed:
  • Georgeta Ghebrea

    (University of Bucharest)

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the main participant and interactive methods and their usefulness for the political science. These methods could provide a profound knowledge of social and political issues. Different target groups and experts hold this knowledge but it becomes accessible to researchers by involving persons belonging to those relevant groups in the scientific research. Therefore, it is not just the involvement of the researcher in the stakeholders‟ life, as in the case of the co-participant observation, but also the involvement of stakeholders in research. In addition to the potential increase in knowledge, these methods produce, as well, political, epistemological, and ethical mutations. Both researchers and other participants suffer a process of transformation, as not only levels and content of knowledge but also concerning their political attitudes and behaviours. Empathy is no longer an obstacle to science but an advantage. Thus, science is no longer a neutral, objective, and external approach to human beings, an approach accessible only to a restricted category (the researchers). The object of the study - i.e. people who are not necessarily scholars - also participates in the production of scientific knowledge. On the other hand, researchers have no longer the privileged position of those who know more and who remain unobserved observers. Scientific research becomes a mutual learning process. Hence, an important distinction of "traditional" epistemology, that of object and subject, is blurred or even erased. Consequently, participant methods are also democratic, eliminating the unequal distribution of power and authority between the two poles involved in scientific research (researchers and human “subjects”). However, there is a strong challenge to these methods, with both indisputable strengths and weaknesses. We will evaluate these issues through examples of using interactive and participant methods in the social research.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgeta Ghebrea, 2018. "Using Interactive and Participant Methods: A Postmodern Shift in Political Science Research?," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:1-15
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/1059
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/po/40?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio SANDU & Elena UNGURU, 2017. "Several Conceptual Clarifications on the Distinction between Constructivism and Social Constructivism," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 51-61, September.
    2. Bolton, Roger E. & Jackson, Randall W. & West, Guy R., 1989. "Introduction," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 237-240.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carla Castañeda, 2009. "How Liberal Peacebuilding May Be Failing Sierra Leone," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(120), pages 235-251, June.
    2. Iuliu Marius Morariu, 2021. "Church and the War. The Vision of the Orthodox Monk Nicola Velimirović about World War I," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(3Sup1), pages 113-124, September.
    3. Haider, Adnan & Hanif, Muhammad Nadeem, 2007. "Inflation Forecasting in Pakistan using Artificial Neural Networks," MPRA Paper 14645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Kgothatso B. Shai, 2017. "South African State Capture: A Symbiotic Affair between Business and State Going Bad(?)," Insight on Africa, , vol. 9(1), pages 62-75, January.
    5. Kamala VALIYEVA, 2016. "The EU’s Eastern Partnership: Normative or Geopolitical Power Projection?," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 11-29, December.
    6. Antonio Sandu & Polixenia Nistor, 2020. "Individual versus Social in Psycho-Sociology. The Social Construction of Reality," Moldavian Journal for Education and Social Psychology, Editura Lumen, vol. 4(2), pages 44-49, December.
    7. Antonio Hernández-Blanco & Boris Herrera-Flores & David Tomás & Borja Navarro-Colorado, 2019. "A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches to Educational Data Mining," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-22, May.
    8. Radhika Govinda, 2012. "Mapping ‘Gender Evaluation’ in South Asia," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 19(2), pages 187-209, June.
    9. Elena Unguru & Antonio Sandu, 2019. "Towards a Model of Supervision in Social Work Institutions in the N-E Region of Romania," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, September.
    10. Bhagirath S. Chauhan & Prashant Jha, 2020. "Glyphosate Resistance in Sonchus oleraceus and Alternative Herbicide Options for Its Control in Southeast Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-13, October.
    11. Antonio Sandu & Camelia Ignătescu, 2020. "Social Construction of the Legal System. Research in the Northeastern Region of Romania," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 111-148, February.
    12. G. Page West III & Charles E. Bamford & Jesse W. Marsden, 2008. "Contrasting Entrepreneurial Economic Developments in Less-Developed Latin American Markets: Applications and Extensions of Resource-Based Theory," Discussion Paper Series 2008-03, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte.
    13. Ricardo Real P. Sousa, 2018. "The context of conflict resolution - international relations and the study of peace and conflict," CEsA Working Papers 164, CEsA - Centre for African and Development Studies.
    14. Mariam Bibilashvili, 2021. "Japan’s South Caucasian diplomacy: the development of Japanese foreign policy towards Georgia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 309-328, September.
    15. Lisa Kraus & Heike Proff, 2021. "Sustainable Urban Transportation Criteria and Measurement—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    16. R. Gopakumar & Kaoru Takara & E. James, 2007. "Hydrologic Data Exploration and River Flow Forecasting of a Humid Tropical River Basin Using Artificial Neural Networks," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 21(11), pages 1915-1940, November.
    17. Joseph Smiles, 2011. "Floor Crossing in South Africa," Insight on Africa, , vol. 3(2), pages 159-175, July.
    18. G. Page West III & Charles E. Bamford & Jesse W. Marsden, 2008. "Contrasting Entrepreneurial Economic Development in Emerging Latin American Economies: Applications and Extensions of Resource-Based Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(1), pages 15-36, January.
    19. Dhiya Al-Jumeily & Rozaida Ghazali & Abir Hussain, 2014. "Predicting Physical Time Series Using Dynamic Ridge Polynomial Neural Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Kate A. Smith, 1999. "Neural Networks for Combinatorial Optimization: A Review of More Than a Decade of Research," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 15-34, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    interactive methods; participant methods; political science; post-positivism; methodological shift;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A23 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Graduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev3rl:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.