IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A magántulajdon terjedése és a vállalatok gazdasági teljesítményei 1988 és 1992 között. Első eredmények
[Expansion of the private sector and the companies' economic performance between 1988 and 1992]

Author

Listed:
  • Major, Iván

Abstract

Hat éve zajlik a magángazdaság kiépülése Magyarországon. Bár a folyamat végét még nem látjuk, egyre fontosabbá válik az a kérdés, hogy mit eredményez a magántulajdon térnyerése a vállalkozások gazdasági teljesítményeiben? A jelen tanulmány annak a vizsgálatnak az első eredményeit ismerteti, amely az 1988-1992 közötti időszakban követte nyomon a kettős könyvvitelt végző vállalkozások jövedelmezőségének, hatékonyságának és termelékenységének változását a tulajdonosi szerkezetük átalakulásával összefüggésben. Ezek a vállalatok és vállalkozások minden évben a foglalkoztatás, az eszközök és a létrehozott GDP 80-90 százalékát adták. Az eredmények ahhoz a következtetéshez vezetnek, hogy a magánvállalkozások összességének jövedelmezősége - tehát tőkehatékonysága - egyelőre nem jobb az állami vállalatokénál, de termelékenységük már meghaladja az állami vállalatokét. Ugyanakkor mind a magánvállalkozások, mind az állami vállalatok csoportjainak átlagos mutatóihoz igen nagy és növekvő szórások tartoztak. A vizsgálat váratlan eredményei felhívják a figyelmet arra, hogy csakis a privatizáció ésszerű módszerekkel történő gyors befejezésétől várható, hogy a magyar gazdaságban ne az állami szektor hasonlítsa magához a magánvállalkozásokat, hanem a magántulajdon megszilárdulásával a magánvállalkozások előnyei kibontakozhassanak.

Suggested Citation

  • Major, Iván, 1995. "A magántulajdon terjedése és a vállalatok gazdasági teljesítményei 1988 és 1992 között. Első eredmények [Expansion of the private sector and the companies' economic performance between 1988 and 199," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 139-173.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=7
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Lipton & Jeffrey Sachs, 1990. "Privitization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 21(2), pages 293-342.
    2. Iván Major, 1993. "Privatization In Eastern Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morck, Randall & Nakamura, Masao, 2018. "Japan's ultimately unaccursed natural resources-financed industrialization," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 32-54.
    2. Bagdadioglu, Necmiddin & Cetinkaya, Murat, 2010. "Sequencing in telecommunications reform: A review of the Turkish case," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 726-735, December.
    3. Kennedy, Robert E., 1997. "A tale of two economies: Economic restructuring in post-socialist Poland," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 841-865, June.
    4. Xie, Yinxi & Xie, Yang, 2017. "Machiavellian experimentation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 685-711.
    5. Robert N. Lussier & Sanja Pfeifer, 2000. "A Comparison of Business Success versus Failure Variables between U.S. and Central Eastern Europe Croatian Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 24(4), pages 59-67, July.
    6. A. Marcincin & S. van Wijnbergen, 1997. "The Impact of Czech Privatisation Methods on Enterprise Performance Incorporating Initial Selection Bias Correction," CERT Discussion Papers 9704, Centre for Economic Reform and Transformation, Heriot Watt University.
    7. Xunan Feng & Anders C. Johansson, 2018. "Underpaid and Corrupt Executives in China’s State Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1199-1212, July.
    8. Sweder J. G. van Wijnbergen & Tim Willems, 2016. "Learning Dynamics and Support for Economic Reforms: Why Good News Can Be Bad," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 30(1), pages 1-23.
    9. Chavis, Larry, 2013. "Social networks and bribery: The case of entrepreneurs in Eastern Europe," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 279-293.
    10. Mikael Olsson & Mikael Lönnborg, 2018. "Trade and foreign direct investment in the Baltic Sea Region, 1990-2015: lessons from attempts at regional integration in post-communist Europe," Working Papers 18005, Economic History Society.
    11. Hiemenz, Ulrich & Funke, Norbert, 1993. "The experience of developing countries with macroeconomic stabilisation and structural adjustment," Kiel Working Papers 606, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. repec:rze:efinan:v:9:y:2012:i:2:p:24-33 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Vladan Ivanović & Vadim Kufenko & Boris Begović & Nenad Stanišić & Vincent Geloso, 2019. "Continuity Under a Different Name: The Outcome of Privatisation in Serbia," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 159-180, March.
    14. Michal Illner, 1998. "The Changing Quality of Life in a Post-Communist Country: The Case of Czech Republic," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 141-170, February.
    15. Hella Engerer, 1996. "Privateigentum, Privatisierung und Transformation," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 65(1), pages 14-30.
    16. Mihályi, Péter, 2003. "A vállalatvezetők motivációja a szocializmusban és a piacgazdaságban - régi és új tapasztalatok [The motives of chief executives under socialism and under a market economy - experiences old and new," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 428-449.
    17. Rudiger Dornbusch & Holger C. Wolf, 1994. "East German Economic Reconstruction," NBER Chapters, in: The Transition in Eastern Europe, Volume 1, Country Studies, pages 155-190, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Funke, Norbert, 1993. "Timing and sequencing of reforms: Competing views," Kiel Working Papers 552, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    19. Zysman, John & Doherty, Eileen & Schwartz, Andrew, 1997. "Tales from the 'global' economy: Cross-national production networks and the reorganization of the European economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 45-85, March.
    20. Jean-François Nivet, 1994. "La privatisation en Pologne : d'une approche plurielle aux difficultés de la privatisation de masse," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 279(1), pages 121-133.
    21. ., 2013. "The Needham Puzzle, the Weber Question and China's Miracle: Long Term Performance since the Sung Dynasty," Chapters, in: D. S.P. Rao & Bart van Ark (ed.), World Economic Performance, chapter 3, pages 42-87, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • P26 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Property Rights
    • P31 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions
    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.