IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tulajdonosi szerkezet és vállalatirányítás a magyar nagyiparban

Author

Listed:
  • Voszka, Éva

Abstract

Mennyire jellemző a magyar nagyvállalatok körében a ,,menedzserkapitalizmus" és a ,,rekombináns tulajdon" hálózati szerveződése? A cikk a száz legnagyobb cég tulajdonosi szerkezetének és vállalatirányítási módszereinek elemzése alapján amellett érvel, hogy mindkét modell szűk körben, illetve sajátos értelemben érvényes. A menedzserment formális-jogi értelemben csak kivételesen részvényes, informális befolyása pedig a tulajdonosi típustól függ: ereje osztott tulajdon mellett és az állami kézben lévő társaságok egy részében meghatározó. A vállalatközi tulajdonlás koncepciója pedig abban az értelemben jellemző, hogy a nagy cégek többsége hálózatokhoz kapcsolódik, de döntően multinacionális cégek leányvállalatairól van szó. Ez pedig nem sajátosan magyar vagy posztszocialista jelenség. A magyar és a külföldi vállalkozások mint tulajdonosok között alapvető különbség van a vállalatirányítás szinte minden területén, ezért a két csoportot nem célszerű a ,,hálózat" fogalmi keretében egységes kategóriaként kezelni.

Suggested Citation

  • Voszka, Éva, 2000. "Tulajdonosi szerkezet és vállalatirányítás a magyar nagyiparban," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 549-564.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=338
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Stark, 1996. "Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, vol. 6.
    2. Earle, John S & Estrin, Saul, 1997. "After Voucher Privatization: The Structure of Corporate Ownership in Russian Manufacturing Industry," CEPR Discussion Papers 1736, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Polterovich, Victor, 2000. "Employment- wage decisions in the insider-owned firm," BOFIT Discussion Papers 1/2000, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    2. Helena Hannula, 2001. "Restructuring of the Estonian economy and the role of FDIs in it," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, in: Foreign Direct Investments in the Estonian Economy, volume 9, chapter 3, pages 91-174, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    3. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    4. Pursey Heugens & Stelios Zyglidopoulos, 2008. "From social ties to embedded competencies: the case of business groups," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(4), pages 325-341, November.
    5. Elizabeth G. Pontikes & William P. Barnett, 2015. "The Persistence of Lenient Market Categories," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1415-1431, October.
    6. Laki, Mihály, 2002. "A nagyvállalkozók tulajdonszerzési esélyeiről a szocializmus után [The chances for large-scale entrepreneurs to amass property after socialism]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 45-58.
    7. Lisa Keister, 2009. "Organizational research on market transition: A sociological approach," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 719-742, December.
    8. Jasiecki Krzysztof, 2018. "The strength and weaknesses of the varieties of capitalism approach: the case of Central and Eastern Europe," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(4), pages 328-342, December.
    9. Chune Young Chung & Jung Hoon Byun & Jason Young, 2019. "Corporate Political Ties and Firm Value: Comparative Analysis in the Korean Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Aidis, Ruta & Estrin, Saul & Mickiewicz, Tomasz, 2008. "Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 656-672, November.
    11. Marangos, John, 2006. "Developing a civilised society in transition economies: The Post Keynesian paradigm," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 660-681, August.
    12. Zuckerman, Ezra W. & Kim, Tai-Young & Ukanwa, Kalinda & James, von Rittmann, 2003. "Robust Identities or Non-Entities? Typecasting in the Feature Film Labor Market," Working papers 4291-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    13. Klaus E Meyer, 2000. "International Production Networks and Enterprise Transformation in Central Europe," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 42(1), pages 135-150, April.
    14. Kiessling, Timothy S. & Richey, R. Glenn & Meng, Juan & Dabic, Marina, 2009. "Exploring knowledge management to organizational performance outcomes in a transitional economy," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 421-433, October.
    15. repec:zbw:bofitp:2008_024 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Imre Gergely Szabó & Marta Kahancová, 2012. "Acting on the Edge of Public Sector: Hospital Corporatization and Collective Bargaining in Hungary and Slovakia," Discussion Papers 1, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    17. Stephen Cornell, 2001. "Enhancing Rural Leadership and Institutions: What Can We Learn from American Indian Nations?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 84-102, January.
    18. Giacomo Negro & Michael T. Hannan & Hayagreeva Rao, 2011. "Category Reinterpretation and Defection: Modernism and Tradition in Italian Winemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1449-1463, December.
    19. Elena Vesselinov, 2004. "The Continuing 'Wind of Change' in the Balkans: Sources of Housing Inequality in Bulgaria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2601-2619, December.
    20. Galit Klein & Djamchid Assadi, 2025. "From Collectivism to Entrepreneurship: Personality Traits Driving Entrepreneurial Transformation in Kibbutzim," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    21. Ricz, Judit, 2020. "Posztkommunista kapitalizmusváltozatok - járadékalapú megközelítés. Gondolatok Mihályi Péter és Szelényi Iván két könyvéről [Variants of post-communist capitalism - an annuity-based approach. Some ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1075-1082.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Odon Sok to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.