IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A közbeszerzés piaci fejlettségének és hatékonyságának megítélése Magyarországon
[Assessing the development and efficiency of public procurement in Hungary]

Author

Listed:
  • Juhász, Péter
  • Tátrai, Tünde

Abstract

A magyar közbeszerzés hatékonyságnövelésének kulcsa a piaci szereplők szerint 2009 óta a közbeszerzési kultúra fejlesztése és a korrupció visszaszorítása, nem pedig a közbeszerzési szabályozás megváltoztatása. Az öt alkalommal is megismételt kérdőíves felmérésünk alapján a hatékonyság megítélésének kulcsa az eljárások időigényének, a közbeszerzés rugalmasságának és kockázatának mértéke, ám a piac eleve elfogad valamilyen hatékonysági elmaradást a versenypiachoz képest. A szabályozás megfelelőségét ugyanakkor a szereplők nem külső mércékhez viszonyítva, hanem elsősorban az elért eredmények tükrében ítélik meg. A közbeszerzési piaci fejlettség mérésére Telgen és szerzőtársai [2007] hétszintű modellje alapján a 4. (közepes) szint azonosítható, ahol a közbeszerzési funkció fő kérdése arra tevődik át, hogy a közbeszerző tudja-e igazolni, hogy jól végzi a munkáját, azaz a szükséges tételeket a legjobb ár-érték arányban szerezte be, és a folyamat során nem történt visszaélés.

Suggested Citation

  • Juhász, Péter & Tátrai, Tünde, 2024. "A közbeszerzés piaci fejlettségének és hatékonyságának megítélése Magyarországon [Assessing the development and efficiency of public procurement in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 444-463.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2181
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2024.4.444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2181
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2024.4.444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2010. "Public procurement as an industrial policy tool: An option for developing countries?," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 368-404, March.
    2. Peter Džupka & Matúš Kubák & Peter Nemec, 2020. "Sustainable Public Procurement in Central European Countries. Can It Also Bring Savings?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Rod Falvey & Annamaria La Chimia & Oliver Morrissey & Evious Zgovu, 2008. "Competition Policy and Public Procurement in Developing Countries," Discussion Papers 08/07, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    4. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Andrea Appolloni & Yasanur Kayikci & Mohammad Iranmanesh, 2023. "The landscape of public procurement research: a bibliometric analysis and topic modelling based on Scopus," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(2), pages 145-178, March.
    5. Clifford P. McCue & Eric Prier & Ryan J. Lofaro, 2021. "Examining year-end spending spikes in the European Economic Area: a comparative study of procurement contracts," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 513-532, April.
    6. Grega Matus & Orviska Marta & Nemec Juraj & Lawson Colin, 2019. "Factors Determining the Efficiency of Slovak Public Procurement," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 43-68, June.
    7. Anthony Flynn, 2018. "Measuring procurement performance in Europe," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 2-13, March.
    8. Olga Chiappinelli, 2020. "Decentralization And Public Procurement Performance: New Evidence From Italy," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(2), pages 856-880, April.
    9. Rainer Kattel & Veiko Lember, 2010. "Public procurement as an industrial policy tool an option for developing countries?," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 31, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    10. Vagstad, Steinar, 1995. "Promoting fair competition in public procurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 283-307, October.
    11. Muñoz-Garcia, Cristina & Vila, Jose, 2019. "Value creation in the international public procurement market: In search of springbok firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 516-521.
    12. Eric Prier & Clifford P. McCue & Csaba Csáki, 2021. "Evaluating Decision Speed as a Measure of Public Procurement Performance in the European Single Market," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 1065-1075, October.
    13. Michal Plaček & František Ochrana & Martin Schmidt & Juraj Nemec & Milan Půček, 2020. "The factors causing delays in public procurement: the Czech Republic versus the UK," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 131-139, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tünde Tátrai & Gyöngyi Vörösmarty & Péter Juhász, 2024. "Intensifying Competition in Public Procurement," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 237-257, March.
    2. Olga Balaeva & Yuliya Rodionova & Andrei Yakovlev & Andrey Tkachenko, 2022. "Public Procurement Efficiency as Perceived by Market Participants: The Case of Russia," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(16), pages 1156-1167, December.
    3. Liu, Xiaofeng & Miao, Haoran & Zhou, Wenxiang & Qiu, Yumin, 2024. "The impact of government procurement on green technological innovation: Evidence from manufacturing sector in china," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    4. Tania Ghossein & Bernard Hoekman & Anirudh Shingal, 2021. "Public Procurement, Regional Integration, and the Belt and Road Initiative [How China Got Sri Lanka to Cough Up a Port]," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 36(2), pages 131-163.
    5. Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Roberto Vivona, 2021. "Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study [Creating the Conditions for Radical Public Service Innovation]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(3), pages 379-396.
    6. Bernard Hoekman, 2015. "International Cooperation on Public Procurement Regulation," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/88, European University Institute.
    7. Ari Van Assche & Ali Arsalan Pasha & Lucian Cernat & Hinrich Voss, 2024. "From the editor – Governments as buyers: the international business implications of public procurement," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 133-146, June.
    8. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo & Filippo Santi, 2022. "Government Demand and Domestic Firms Growth: Evidence from Uganda," RSCAS Working Papers 2022/54, European University Institute.
    9. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    10. Marius BRÜLHART & Federico TRIONFETTI, 2000. "Public Expenditure and International Specialisation," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 00.23, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    11. Peter Nemec, 2024. "Contesting the public works domain: examining the factors affecting presence and success of SMES in public procurement," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(5), pages 2135-2173, November.
    12. Kazak Jan K. & Simeunović Nataša & Hendricks Andreas, 2019. "Hidden Public Value Identification of Real Estate Management Decisions," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 27(4), pages 96-104, December.
    13. Chiara Carboni & Elisabetta Iossa & Gianpiero Mattera, 2018. "Barriers towards foreign firms in international public procurement markets: a review," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 45(1), pages 85-107, March.
    14. Leandro Arozamena & Nicholas Shunda & Federico Weinschelbaum, 2014. "Optimal nondiscriminatory auctions with favoritism," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(1), pages 252-262.
    15. Dimitri Mardas, 1999. "Tendering procedures and buy-national policies," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 5(2), pages 189-203, May.
    16. Konrad, Kai A. & Erik Lommerud, Kjell, 2001. "Foreign direct investment, intra-firm trade and ownership structure," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 475-494, March.
    17. Pierre-Henri Morand & François Maréchal, 2021. "Achats responsables et achat local : théorie et enseignements des données ouvertes françaises," Post-Print hal-03392039, HAL.
    18. Takano, Guillermo, 2021. "The competitive performance of public-private partnership markets. The case of unsolicited proposals in Peru," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Waldemiro Francisco Sorte Jr., 2016. "State intervention for industrial growth: a comparison between Brazil and Japan," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1/2), pages 1-27.
    20. Bernard Hoekman & Marco Sanfilippo, 2018. "Firm performance and participation in public procurement: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/16, European University Institute.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H57 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Procurement

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Odon Sok to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.