IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/2064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hány fecske csinál nyarat? A nem teljes hálózati szerkezet és az attitűd hatása az együttműködésre
[How many swallows make a summer? The impact of incomplete network structure and attitude on cooperation]

Author

Listed:
  • Sebestyén, Tamás
  • Braun, Emese

Abstract

A kooperatív magatartás olyan meghatározó része a mindennapoknak, amelyet számos tényező képes befolyásolni. Ez a tanulmány ezek közül a hálózati viszonosságra és a konformitásra összpontosít. Egy olyan egyszeri többszereplős fogolydilemma-játékból indulunk ki, amely megkülönbözteti a konformista és a klasszikus játékból ismert racionális magatartást. A kapott eredmények alapján az egyének kapcsolatrendszerének - különösen a konformisták miatt -, valamint a társadalom kezdeti együttműködési intenzitásának jelentős szerepe van abban, hogy milyen mértékű együttműködés jön létre a játék egyensúlyában. Az elemzésben az ösztönzők megváltoztatásával egy speciális, fokszámarányos jutalmazási mechanizmust is vizsgálunk, amely a tovagyűrűző hatásokon keresztül segíti elő a magasabb kooperációs arány létrejöttét.* Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: C63, C72, D85, D91.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebestyén, Tamás & Braun, Emese, 2022. "Hány fecske csinál nyarat? A nem teljes hálózati szerkezet és az attitűd hatása az együttműködésre [How many swallows make a summer? The impact of incomplete network structure and attitude on coope," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 869-901.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2064
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2022.7-8.869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=2064
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2022.7-8.869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clark, Kenneth & Sefton, Martin, 2001. "The Sequential Prisoner's Dilemma: Evidence on Reciprocation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 111(468), pages 51-68, January.
    2. Khadjavi, Menusch & Lange, Andreas, 2013. "Prisoners and their dilemma," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 163-175.
    3. Aming Li & Lei Zhou & Qi Su & Sean P. Cornelius & Yang-Yu Liu & Long Wang & Simon A. Levin, 2020. "Evolution of cooperation on temporal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    5. Yang, Zhihu & Li, Zhi & Wang, Long, 2020. "Evolution of cooperation in a conformity-driven evolving dynamic social network," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 379(C).
    6. Okada, Akira, 1993. "The Possibility of Cooperation in an n-Person Prisoners' Dilemma with Institutional Arrangements," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 629-656, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Bin-Quan & Wu, Zhi-Xi & Guan, Jian-Yue, 2022. "Critical thresholds of benefit distribution in an extended snowdrift game model," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Cheng, Jiangjiang & Mei, Wenjun & Su, Wei & Chen, Ge, 2023. "Evolutionary games on networks: Phase transition, quasi-equilibrium, and mathematical principles," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 611(C).
    3. Pan, Na & Zeng, Ziyan & Zhang, Yuji & Feng, Minyu, 2024. "Defined benefit pension plan inhibit the emergence of cooperation in the public goods games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    4. Gao, Shiping & Li, Nan, 2023. "Preference reversal and the evolution of cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    5. Du, Jinming & Wu, Ziren, 2022. "Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in dynamic networked systems with active striving mechanism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 430(C).
    6. Khadjavi, Menusch & Sipangule, Kacana & Thiele, Rainer, 2016. "Social capital and large-scale agricultural investments: An experimental investigation in Zambia," Kiel Working Papers 2056, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Du, Jinming & Wu, Ziren, 2023. "Coevolutionary dynamics of strategy and network structure with publicity mechanism," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 623(C).
    8. Yang, Yimei & Sun, Hao & Xu, Genjiu, 2022. "Bilaterally-agree partner switching promotes cooperation in social dilemmas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 585(C).
    9. Yao Meng & Sean P. Cornelius & Yang-Yu Liu & Aming Li, 2024. "Dynamics of collective cooperation under personalised strategy updates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Becchetti, Leonardo & Degli Antoni, Giacomo & Ottone, Stefania & Solferino, Nazaria, 2013. "Allocation criteria under task performance: The gendered preference for protection," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 96-111.
    11. Zvonimir Bašić & Parampreet C. Bindra & Daniela Glätzle-Rützler & Angelo Romano & Matthias Sutter & Claudia Zoller, 2021. "The Roots of Cooperation," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 097, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    12. Menusch Khadjavi, 2018. "Deterrence works for criminals," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 165-178, August.
    13. Trenchard, Hugh, 2015. "The peloton superorganism and protocooperative behavior," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 270(C), pages 179-192.
    14. R. Bentley & Michael O’Brien & Paul Ormerod, 2011. "Quality versus mere popularity: a conceptual map for understanding human behavior," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 10(2), pages 181-191, December.
    15. Jorge Peña & Yannick Rochat, 2012. "Bipartite Graphs as Models of Population Structures in Evolutionary Multiplayer Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-13, September.
    16. Pierre Courtois & Rabia Nessah & Tarik Tazdaït, 2024. "Revolutions and rational choice: A critical discussion," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 497-529, September.
    17. von Siemens, Ferdinand A., 2013. "Intention-based reciprocity and the hidden costs of control," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 55-65.
    18. Peng Liu & Haoxiang Xia, 2015. "Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 101-134, April.
    19. Aslihan Akdeniz & Matthijs van Veelen, 2019. "The cancellation effect at the group level," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-073/I, Tinbergen Institute.
    20. Shaun P. Hargreaves Heap, 2013. "Rationality," Chapters, in: Luigino Bruni & Stefano Zamagni (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Reciprocity and Social Enterprise, chapter 28, pages 277-284, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:2064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.