IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v51y2024i6d10.1007_s11116-023-10405-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating one-way electric carsharing systems with a multi-agent model

Author

Listed:
  • Daoge Wang

    (Jiangsu University
    Rui’an Graduate College of Wenzhou University)

  • Jianhong Ye

    (Tongji University
    UNEP-Tongji Institute of Environment for Sustainable Development (IESD), Tongji University)

  • Bin Yu

    (Tongji University)

  • Peng Jing

    (Jiangsu University)

  • Lei Gao

    (Tongji University)

Abstract

With improved technology and supported public policy, electric vehicles (EVs) are coming back in one-way carsharing from the 2010s. Although the addition of EVs offers a way to achieve carbon neutrality, the shorter vehicle range and longer charging time of EVs pose a greater challenge to the operation of one-way carsharing than fuel vehicles. Methods such as trial-and-error testing or mathematical models have difficulty in handling complex systems with mutual feedback between demand and supply. Therefore, this paper builds a one-way electric carsharing model and integrates it into an open-source multi-agent transport simulation platform (MATSim) to study its supply and demand relationship. A Shanghai baseline scenario was built to validate the model and test the impacts of vehicle range, charging rate, and power supply mode on carsharing demand. The results show that: (1) Vehicle range expansion and charging rate improvement have less impact on carsharing demand. The current vehicle range and charging rate can meet the daily use in Shanghai. (2) When the power supply mode changes from charging piles to battery swapping, the carsharing usage decreases slightly (-3%), while the carsharing trip characteristics remain almost the same. This means that operators could use battery swapping for power supply. This study provides suggestions for electric carsharing operators in Shanghai, as well as a simulation tool for more operators to test the supply and demand relationship of electric carsharing.

Suggested Citation

  • Daoge Wang & Jianhong Ye & Bin Yu & Peng Jing & Lei Gao, 2024. "Simulating one-way electric carsharing systems with a multi-agent model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2277-2300, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:51:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10405-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10405-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-023-10405-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-023-10405-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Shaheen & Nelson Chan & Helen Micheaux, 2015. "One-way carsharing’s evolution and operator perspectives from the Americas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 519-536, May.
    2. Li, Xiaopeng & Ma, Jiaqi & Cui, Jianxun & Ghiasi, Amir & Zhou, Fang, 2016. "Design framework of large-scale one-way electric vehicle sharing systems: A continuum approximation model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 21-45.
    3. He, Brian Yueshuai & Zhou, Jinkai & Ma, Ziyi & Wang, Ding & Sha, Di & Lee, Mina & Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ozbay, Kaan, 2021. "A validated multi-agent simulation test bed to evaluate congestion pricing policies on population segments by time-of-day in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-161.
    4. David Charypar & Kai Nagel, 2005. "Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 369-397, July.
    5. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson & Micheaux, Helen, 2015. "One-Way Carsharing's Evolution and Operator Perspectives from the Americas," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt83s1z8j4, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Arnott, Richard & de Palma, Andre & Lindsey, Robin, 1993. "A Structural Model of Peak-Period Congestion: A Traffic Bottleneck with Elastic Demand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(1), pages 161-179, March.
    7. Xu, Min & Meng, Qiang & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2018. "Electric vehicle fleet size and trip pricing for one-way carsharing services considering vehicle relocation and personnel assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 60-82.
    8. Francesco Ciari & Milos Balac & Michael Balmer, 2015. "Modelling the effect of different pricing schemes on free-floating carsharing travel demand: a test case for Zurich, Switzerland," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 413-433, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golalikhani, Masoud & Oliveira, Beatriz Brito & Carravilla, Maria Antónia & Oliveira, José Fernando & Antunes, António Pais, 2021. "Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Huang, Kai & An, Kun & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida, 2020. "Planning station capacity and fleet size of one-way electric carsharing systems with continuous state of charge functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1075-1091.
    3. Boyacı, Burak & Zografos, Konstantinos G., 2019. "Investigating the effect of temporal and spatial flexibility on the performance of one-way electric carsharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 244-272.
    4. Stefan Illgen & Michael Höck, 2020. "Establishing car sharing services in rural areas: a simulation-based fleet operations analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 811-826, April.
    5. Illgen, Stefan & Höck, Michael, 2019. "Literature review of the vehicle relocation problem in one-way car sharing networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 193-204.
    6. Reza Vosooghi & Joseph Kamel & Jakob Puchinger & Vincent Leblond & Marija Jankovic, 2019. "Robo-Taxi service fleet sizing: assessing the impact of user trust and willingness-to-use," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1997-2015, December.
    7. Yixi Xue & Yi Zhang & Yi Chen, 2019. "An Evaluation Framework for the Planning of Electric Car-Sharing Systems: A Combination Model of AHP-CBA-VD," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Zhang, J. & Meng, M. & Wang, David, Z.W., 2019. "A dynamic pricing scheme with negative prices in dockless bike sharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 201-224.
    9. Huang, Kai & An, Kun & Rich, Jeppe & Ma, Wanjing, 2020. "Vehicle relocation in one-way station-based electric carsharing systems: A comparative study of operator-based and user-based methods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Terrien, Clara & Maniak, Rémi & Chen, Bo & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Good Practices for Advancing Urban Mobility Innovation: A Case Study of One-Way Carsharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53z3h2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Ren, Shuyun & Luo, Fengji & Lin, Lei & Hsu, Shu-Chien & LI, Xuran Ivan, 2019. "A novel dynamic pricing scheme for a large-scale electric vehicle sharing network considering vehicle relocation and vehicle-grid-integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 339-351.
    12. Zahra Navidi & Nicole Ronald & Stephan Winter, 2018. "Comparison between ad-hoc demand responsive and conventional transit: a simulation study," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 147-167, May.
    13. Circella, Giovanni & Alemi, Farzad & Tiedeman, Kate & Handy, Susan & Mokhtarian, Patricia, 2018. "The Adoption of Shared Mobility in California and Its Relationship with Other Components of Travel Behavior," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1kq5d07p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Liu, Yang & Xie, Jiaohong & Chen, Nan, 2022. "Stochastic one-way carsharing systems with dynamic relocation incentives through preference learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. Weibo Li & Maria Kamargianni, 2020. "Steering short-term demand for car-sharing: a mode choice and policy impact analysis by trip distance," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2233-2265, October.
    16. Xiaowei Chen & Hongyu Zheng & Ze Wang & Xiqun Chen, 2021. "Exploring impacts of on-demand ridesplitting on mobility via real-world ridesourcing data and questionnaires," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1541-1561, August.
    17. Perboli, Guido & Ferrero, Francesco & Musso, Stefano & Vesco, Andrea, 2018. "Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 32-48.
    18. Cui, Shaohua & Ma, Xiaolei & Zhang, Mingheng & Yu, Bin & Yao, Baozhen, 2022. "The parallel mobile charging service for free-floating shared electric vehicle clusters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    19. Sweet, Matthias N. & Scott, Darren M., 2021. "Shared mobility adoption from 2016 to 2018 in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: Demographic or geographic diffusion?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Kaddoura, Ihab & Nagel, Kai, 2019. "Congestion pricing in a real-world oriented agent-based simulation context," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 40-51.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:51:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10405-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.