Author
Listed:
- Yu Zhang
(Chongqing Jiaotong University)
- Xiaodan Wang
(Chongqing Open University)
- Jingjing Xie
(Chongqing Academy of Big Data)
- Yun Bai
(Chongqing Technology and Business University)
Abstract
An efficient transportation system is conducive to maintaining traffic flow and safety. Passenger flow forecasting (PFF), an area of traffic forecasting, is a key part of the efficient transportation system. In recent years, deep-learning-based models have led to extensive research on the different conditions in this field. Hence, model determination is the most suitable for a specific application would be a key advantage. To address this issue, a comparative analysis of nine typical deep network approaches, including recurrent neural network (long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU)), bidirectional-based RNN (BiLSTM and BiGRU), convolutional neural network (CNN) (CNN1D and CNN2D), convolutional LSTM, and hybrid network (CNN1D-LSTM and CNN1D-GRU), for hourly PFF has been conducted. This comparison utilized two datasets with hourly records of bus lines from Guangzhou, China. The comparison results show that the bidirectional-based models were slightly better than other candidates in terms of the values of the root-mean-square error, determination coefficient, and Theil coefficient, and had a lower individual error distribution than the others, both numerically and proportionally. Furthermore, the bidirectional-based models were different from the other models in terms of the Friedman test (a special case is that the BiLSTM and LSTM had no significant difference for Line 10 application). Besides, the results from model structure aspect indicated that the bidirectional-based models achieved better performance with stable and reliable model structure (measurement index: posterior error distribution) and less computational complexity (measurement index: number of floating-point operations and parameters). It is concluded that the bidirectional-based deep learning models are the preferential choice for hourly PFF.
Suggested Citation
Yu Zhang & Xiaodan Wang & Jingjing Xie & Yun Bai, 2024.
"Comparative analysis of deep-learning-based models for hourly bus passenger flow forecasting,"
Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1759-1784, October.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:transp:v:51:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10385-1
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-023-10385-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:51:y:2024:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-023-10385-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.