IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v47y2020i4d10.1007_s11116-019-10033-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance analysis of crowd-shipping in urban and suburban areas

Author

Listed:
  • Alireza Ermagun

    (Mississippi State University)

  • Ali Shamshiripour

    (University of Illinois at Chicago)

  • Amanda Stathopoulos

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

Crowd logistics is a novel shipping concept where delivery operations are carried out by using existing resources, namely vehicle capacity and drivers from the crowd, thereby offering potential for economic, social, and environmental benefits. Despite the promise of this new logistics model, little is known about its actual functioning, performance, and impact. This paper presents a pioneering study of the performance of a real crowd-shipping system in the U.S. using empirical data from 2 years of operations. We contribute to the literature by: (1) defining performance metrics and developing models that account for the specificity of crowd-shipping systems by distinguishing the essential stages from bidding to acceptance and delivery of shipments, (2) identifying the significant covariates, including shipment features, built environment, and socio-demographic factors giving rise to different delivery performance outcomes, and (3) deriving sensitivity analysis to study the performance and implications of crowd-shipping in urban and suburban areas. The analysis is formalized as two-level nested logit models with nests representing bidding and delivery outcomes. The results show that not only does the delivery outcome performance vary significantly between urban and suburban areas, but the explanatory factors also vary significantly for the two contexts. Additionally, several factors have ambiguous impacts depending on the stage. Larger shipment size (versus strict deadlines) leads to increasing (decreasing) the likelihood of bids being placed, while having the opposite effect when it comes to the delivery phase. The findings highlight the need for developing different strategies to foster and improve the performance of this novel system depending on both the urban–suburban shipping context and the stage of delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Alireza Ermagun & Ali Shamshiripour & Amanda Stathopoulos, 2020. "Performance analysis of crowd-shipping in urban and suburban areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1955-1985, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:47:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-019-10033-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-019-10033-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-019-10033-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-019-10033-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank, 2018. "The integration of item-sharing and crowdshipping: Can collaborative consumption be pushed by delivering through the crowd?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 227-243.
    2. Devari, Aashwinikumar & Nikolaev, Alexander G. & He, Qing, 2017. "Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-122.
    3. Laetitia Dablanc & Scott Ogilvie & Anne Goodchild, 2014. "Logistics Sprawl: Differential Warehousing Development Patterns in Los Angeles and Seattle," Post-Print hal-00944130, HAL.
    4. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    5. Koppelman, Frank S. & Wen, Chieh-Hua, 1998. "Alternative nested logit models: structure, properties and estimation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 289-298, June.
    6. Ermagun, Alireza & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2018. "To bid or not to bid: An empirical study of the supply determinants of crowd-shipping," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 468-483.
    7. Holgui­n-Veras, José & Wang, Qian & Xu, Ning & Ozbay, Kaan & Cetin, Mecit & Polimeni, John, 2006. "The impacts of time of day pricing on the behavior of freight carriers in a congested urban area: Implications to road pricing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 744-766, November.
    8. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    9. Martin Savelsbergh & Tom Van Woensel, 2016. "50th Anniversary Invited Article—City Logistics: Challenges and Opportunities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 579-590, May.
    10. Lee, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin, 2015. "Dynamic ridesharing: Is there a role for dedicated drivers?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 483-497.
    11. Mehmann, Jens & Frehe, Volker & Teuteberg, Frank, 2015. "Crowd Logistics − A Literature Review and Maturity Model," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovations and Strategies for Logistics and Supply Chains: Technologies, Business Models and Risk Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 20, pages 117-145, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    12. Amir Samimi & Kazuya Kawamura & Abolfazl Mohammadian, 2011. "A behavioral analysis of freight mode choice decisions," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 857-869, June.
    13. Jianqiang Cui & Jago Dodson & Peter V. Hall, 2015. "Planning for Urban Freight Transport: An Overview," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 583-598, September.
    14. Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María & García-Menéndez, Leandro & Román, Concepción, 2015. "Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 252-267.
    15. Rich, J. & Holmblad, P.M. & Hansen, C.O., 2009. "A weighted logit freight mode-choice model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1006-1019, November.
    16. Sönke Behrends & Maria Lindholm & Johan Woxenius, 2008. "The Impact of Urban Freight Transport: A Definition of Sustainability from an Actor's Perspective," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 693-713, September.
    17. Cidell, Julie, 2010. "Concentration and decentralization: The new geography of freight distribution in US metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 363-371.
    18. Stiglic, Mitja & Agatz, Niels & Savelsbergh, Martin & Gradisar, Mirko, 2016. "Making dynamic ride-sharing work: The impact of driver and rider flexibility," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 190-207.
    19. Arslan, A.M. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Kroon, L.G. & Zuidwijk, R.A., 2016. "Crowdsourced Delivery: A Dynamic Pickup and Delivery Problem with Ad-hoc Drivers," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2016-003-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Archetti, Claudia & Savelsbergh, Martin & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2016. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Occasional Drivers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 472-480.
    21. Allen, J. & Browne, M. & Cherrett, T., 2012. "Investigating relationships between road freight transport, facility location, logistics management and urban form," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 45-57.
    22. Kafle, Nabin & Zou, Bo & Lin, Jane, 2017. "Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 62-82.
    23. Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Dongxiang & Liu, Qing & Shen, Fumin & Lee, Loo Hay, 2016. "Towards enhancing the last-mile delivery: An effective crowd-tasking model with scalable solutions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 279-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin W.P Savelsbergh & Marlin W. Ulmer, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in crowdsourced delivery planning and operations," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Thoen, Sebastian & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lori, 2023. "A disaggregate model of passenger-freight matching in crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Stokkink, Patrick & Cordeau, Jean-François & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2024. "A column and row generation approach to the crowd-shipping problem with transfers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Ghaderi, Hadi & Zhang, Lele & Tsai, Pei-Wei & Woo, Jihoon, 2022. "Crowdsourced last-mile delivery with parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    5. Fei Ma & Yujie Zhu & Kum Fai Yuen & Qipeng Sun & Haonan He & Xiaobo Xu & Zhen Shang & Yan Xu, 2022. "Exploring the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Sustainable Driving Factors of Information Flow Network: A Public Search Attention Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Yang, Dingtong & Hyland, Michael F. & Jayakrishnan, R., 2024. "Tackling the crowdsourced shared-trip delivery problem at scale with a novel decomposition heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Mancini, Simona & Gansterer, Margaretha, 2022. "Bundle generation for last-mile delivery with occasional drivers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank, 2018. "The integration of item-sharing and crowdshipping: Can collaborative consumption be pushed by delivering through the crowd?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 227-243.
    2. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    3. Mourad, Abood & Puchinger, Jakob & Chu, Chengbin, 2019. "A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 323-346.
    4. Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz & Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska, 2019. "Priorities of Urban Transport System Stakeholders According to Crowd Logistics Solutions in City Areas. A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    6. Ermagun, Alireza & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2018. "To bid or not to bid: An empirical study of the supply determinants of crowd-shipping," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 468-483.
    7. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2019. "An exact solution method for the capacitated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 589-604.
    8. Marlin Ulmer & Martin Savelsbergh, 2020. "Workforce Scheduling in the Era of Crowdsourced Delivery," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 1113-1133, July.
    9. Bathke, Henrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2021. "Accepting a crowdsourced delivery - A choice-based conjoint analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 65-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    10. Yang, Dingtong & Hyland, Michael F. & Jayakrishnan, R., 2024. "Tackling the crowdsourced shared-trip delivery problem at scale with a novel decomposition heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    12. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    13. Cleophas, Catherine & Cottrill, Caitlin & Ehmke, Jan Fabian & Tierney, Kevin, 2019. "Collaborative urban transportation: Recent advances in theory and practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 801-816.
    14. Ghaderi, Hadi & Zhang, Lele & Tsai, Pei-Wei & Woo, Jihoon, 2022. "Crowdsourced last-mile delivery with parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    15. Boysen, Nils & Emde, Simon & Schwerdfeger, Stefan, 2022. "Crowdshipping by employees of distribution centers: Optimization approaches for matching supply and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(2), pages 539-556.
    16. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    17. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2021. "A multi-period analysis of the integrated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 483-499.
    18. Martin W.P Savelsbergh & Marlin W. Ulmer, 2022. "Challenges and opportunities in crowdsourced delivery planning and operations," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Marta Viu-Roig & Eduard J. Alvarez-Palau, 2020. "The Impact of E-Commerce-Related Last-Mile Logistics on Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Thoen, Sebastian & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lori, 2023. "A disaggregate model of passenger-freight matching in crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:47:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11116-019-10033-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.