IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v46y2019i5d10.1007_s11116-018-9898-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on route choice preferences for commuter and non-commuter bicyclists: a case study of Kharagpur and Asansol, India

Author

Listed:
  • Bandhan Bandhu Majumdar

    (Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani Hyderabad Campus)

  • Sudeshna Mitra

    (Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)

Abstract

The bicycle is one of the most affordable and flexible means of transportation in a developing country such as India. Despite being an important mode of transportation, a sharp decline in bicycle mode share has been observed in small and medium-sized Indian cities where trip lengths are favorable for bicycling. This decline could be attributed to inadequate bicycle infrastructure which should be improved not only to preserve the existing bicycle base, but also to attract new bicycle users. For such an improvement, it is essential to identify and evaluate key attributes that users value to select a bicycle route. In this study users’ preferences for bicycle infrastructure were collected with the help of stated preference survey in two Indian cities, Kharagpur and Asansol, and were used to estimate the choice preferences of both commuter and non-commuter bicyclists. In total, five different attributes were found to influence bicycle route choice, namely, road width, level of risk, route visibility, journey time and operating cost. With the collected data, random parameter logit (RPL) models were developed with and without considering heterogeneity around the means of the attributes. Based on the results of these RPL model coefficients and willingness to pay (WTP) values, the five attributes were estimated to quantify the perceived benefits associated with each attribute. Results indicate that the level of risk (a measure of perceived risk associated with motorized vehicles) is considered the most significant deterrent influencing bicyclist’s route choice decisions in both cities referred to above, followed by route visibility, road width and bicycle journey time. For almost all attributes, the WTP’s for non-commuters are found significantly higher than those for commuters.

Suggested Citation

  • Bandhan Bandhu Majumdar & Sudeshna Mitra, 2019. "A study on route choice preferences for commuter and non-commuter bicyclists: a case study of Kharagpur and Asansol, India," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1839-1865, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:46:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-018-9898-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-018-9898-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-018-9898-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-018-9898-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hopkinson, P & Wardman, M, 1996. "Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 241-249, October.
    2. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    3. J. Hunt & J. Abraham, 2007. "Influences on bicycle use," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 453-470, July.
    4. Ipek Sener & Naveen Eluru & Chandra Bhat, 2009. "An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 511-539, September.
    5. Noland, Robert B & Kunreuther, Howard, 1995. "Short-run and long-run policies for increasing bicycle transportation for daily commuter trips," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 67-79, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cubells, Jerònia & Miralles-Guasch, Carme & Marquet, Oriol, 2023. "E-scooter and bike-share route choice and detours: Modelling the influence of built environment and sociodemographic factors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Hsueh, Chieh & Lin, Jen-Jia, 2023. "Influential factors of the route choices of scooter riders: A GPS-based data study," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Das, Deepjyoti & Bhaduri, Eeshan & Velaga, Nagendra R., 2023. "Modeling commuters’ preference towards sharing paratransit services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 132-149.
    4. Scott, Darren M. & Lu, Wei & Brown, Matthew J., 2021. "Route choice of bike share users: Leveraging GPS data to derive choice sets," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Howard White & Nina Ashley O. Dela Cruz & Ashrita Saran & John Eyers & Denny John & Ella Beveridge & Nina Blöndal, 2021. "Studies of the effectiveness of transport sector interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Mitra, Sudeshna, 2018. "Analysis of bicycle route-related improvement strategies for two Indian cities using a stated preference survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 176-188.
    2. Mahdi Rashidi & Seyed-Mohammad Seyedhosseini & Ali Naderan, 2023. "Defining Psychological Factors of Cycling in Tehran City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Palhazi Cuervo, Daniel & Kessels, Roselinde & Goos, Peter & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2016. "An integrated algorithm for the optimal design of stated choice experiments with partial profiles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 648-669.
    4. Santos, Georgina & Behrendt, Hannah & Teytelboym, Alexander, 2010. "Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 46-91.
    5. Ruiz, Tomás & Bernabé, José C., 2014. "Measuring factors influencing valuation of nonmotorized improvement measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 195-211.
    6. Menghini, G. & Carrasco, N. & Schüssler, N. & Axhausen, K.W., 2010. "Route choice of cyclists in Zurich," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(9), pages 754-765, November.
    7. Álvaro Fernández-Heredia & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Andrés Monzón, 2016. "Modelling bicycle use intention: the role of perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Álvaro Fernández-Heredia & Sergio Jara-Díaz & Andrés Monzón, 2016. "Modelling bicycle use intention: the role of perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M., 2011. "Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 63-79, January.
    10. Götschi, Thomas & Hintermann, Beat, 2013. "Valuation of public investment to support bicycling (FV-09)," Working papers 2013/02, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
    11. Anowar, Sabreena & Eluru, Naveen & Hatzopoulou, Marianne, 2017. "Quantifying the value of a clean ride: How far would you bicycle to avoid exposure to traffic-related air pollution?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 66-78.
    12. Ehrgott, Matthias & Wang, Judith Y.T. & Raith, Andrea & van Houtte, Chris, 2012. "A bi-objective cyclist route choice model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 652-663.
    13. Ma, Liang & Ye, Runing, 2019. "Does daily commuting behavior matter to employee productivity?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 130-141.
    14. Yeran Sun & Amin Mobasheri, 2017. "Utilizing Crowdsourced Data for Studies of Cycling and Air Pollution Exposure: A Case Study Using Strava Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Lei Kang & Jon Fricker, 2013. "Bicyclist commuters’ choice of on-street versus off-street route segments," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 887-902, September.
    16. Wardman, Mark & Hatfield, Richard & Page, Matthew, 1997. "The UK national cycling strategy: can improved facilities meet the targets?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 123-133, April.
    17. Umer Mansoor & Mohammad Tamim Kashifi & Fazal Rehman Safi & Syed Masiur Rahman, 2022. "A review of factors and benefits of non-motorized transport: a way forward for developing countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1560-1582, February.
    18. Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Iacobelli, Andrés & Valeze, Claudio, 2000. "Estimating demand for a cycle-way network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 353-373, June.
    19. Adsule, Poonam & Kadali, B Raghuram, 2024. "Analysis of contributing factors in decision to bicycle in developing countries context," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 50-58.
    20. Felipe González & Carlos Melo-Riquelme & Louis Grange, 2016. "A combined destination and route choice model for a bicycle sharing system," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 407-423, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:46:y:2019:i:5:d:10.1007_s11116-018-9898-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.