IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v30y2017i3d10.1007_s11138-016-0360-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A social morality for mortals: A review essay of the order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J. Boettke

    (George Mason University)

  • Rosolino A. Candela

    (George Mason University)

Abstract

This essay praises Gerald Gaus’s The Order of Public Reason as a building block for all normative explorations into the institutional foundations of human sociability. It evaluates the normative implications put forth by Gaus in terms of the Kirzner’s “finder’s keeper’s ethic.” This raises a question about the relationship between the moral order and the political order that underlies market processes. Examining the role of entrepreneurship in the market process in relation to Kirzner’s “finder’s keeper’s principle” suggests a deeper ethical foundation that underpins the institutional conditions of “social morality.”

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J. Boettke & Rosolino A. Candela, 2017. "A social morality for mortals: A review essay of the order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 365-375, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:30:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11138-016-0360-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11138-016-0360-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11138-016-0360-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11138-016-0360-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Horwitz, 2008. "Monetary Calculation and the Extension of Social Cooperation into Anonymity," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 23(Spring 20), pages 81-93.
    2. D. Den Uyl, 2009. "Homo moralis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 349-385, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas Uyl, 2014. "Natura naturans, natura naturata," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 175-182, June.
    2. Argandoña, Antonio, 2014. "La ética en la empresa y la ética del directivo," IESE Research Papers D/1089, IESE Business School.
    3. Stringham, Edward Peter, 2011. "Embracing morals in economics: The role of internal moral constraints in a market economy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 98-109, April.
    4. Zawojska, Aldona, 2010. "Homo agricola considered as homo economicus and homo politicus," IAMO Forum 2010: Institutions in Transition – Challenges for New Modes of Governance 52709, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
    5. Mikayla Novak, 2023. "The Emancipatory Liberalism of Steven Horwitz: The Case of Women’s Economic Status," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 38(Winter 20), pages 55-71.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gerald Gaus; Israel Kirzner; Socialist calculation debate; Political economy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B2 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925
    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:30:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11138-016-0360-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.