IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v27y2014i2p175-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natura naturans, natura naturata

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas Uyl

Abstract

In this paper, which is concerned with philosophical methodology as it might affect social science and ethics, the endeavor is to explore the depth and implications of Buchanan’s interest in Spinoza. After establishing their connection, the paper explores the parallels between Spinoza’s “dualism” and Buchanan’s own dualism and how that can shed light on Buchanan’s distinction between constitutional and operational modalities. Given their analogous perspectives, the paper then considers the possibility of dimensional shifts in the dualism, such that what was once a constitutional perspective becomes operational and how that ability to shift might affect various research agendas in the social sciences and ethics. Finally, we raise the question of how separate are the two levels and can they be brought together. In a Spinozistic framework, they ultimately would collapse into a monism, but the conclusion here is that for Buchanan there must always be a gap between them. As a result, the effort to resolve the tension between the dimensions may signal future research agendas in ethics and political economy. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas Uyl, 2014. "Natura naturans, natura naturata," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 175-182, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:27:y:2014:i:2:p:175-182
    DOI: 10.1007/s11138-014-0261-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11138-014-0261-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11138-014-0261-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. Den Uyl, 2009. "Homo moralis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 22(4), pages 349-385, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boleslaw Z. Kabala & Rainey Johnson, 2021. "An American Notwithstanding Clause? Between Potestas and Potentia," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter J. Boettke & Rosolino A. Candela, 2017. "A social morality for mortals: A review essay of the order of public reason: A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 365-375, September.
    2. Stringham, Edward Peter, 2011. "Embracing morals in economics: The role of internal moral constraints in a market economy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 98-109.
    3. Argandoña, Antonio, 2014. "La ética en la empresa y la ética del directivo," IESE Research Papers D/1089, IESE Business School.
    4. Zawojska, Aldona, 2010. "Homo agricola considered as homo economicus and homo politicus," IAMO Forum 2010: Institutions in Transition – Challenges for New Modes of Governance 52709, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Methodology; Ethics; Buchanan; Spinoza; Research; Political economy; Public choice; Dualism; Constitutional perspective; Hayek; Choice; B3; B4; B5; Y8; Z1;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B3 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals
    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
    • B5 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches
    • Y8 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines
    • Z1 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:27:y:2014:i:2:p:175-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.