IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v40y2021i3d10.1007_s11113-020-09587-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Postcensal Household Size for NYC’s Neighborhoods

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Jacoby

    (New York City Department of City Planning)

  • Peter Lobo

    (New York City Department of City Planning)

  • Joseph J. Salvo

    (New York City Department of City Planning)

Abstract

While the decennial census provides a full count of people in households once every ten years, small area population estimates from the American Community Survey (ACS) have proven unreliable for postcensal time points. The housing unit method, however, can be used to estimate the population: Administrative data on net new construction in the post-census period can be used to estimate the housing stock, and then combined with estimates of household size and occupancy levels to create population estimates for postcensal time points. However, a major stumbling block is the unavailability of reliable household size measures between censuses. Typically, housing unit method users default to data on persons per household (PpH) from the previous census, despite changes in PpH that may have occurred at the local level. Building on prior regression-based PpH research at the county level, we develop postcensal estimates of household size at a sub-county level. We first employ a regression-based model that predicts PpH in 2010 controlling for lagged PpH in 2000 and 2000–2010 changes in symptomatic indicators, which include housing stock and birth rates from local administrative data, and socio-demographic variables from the ACS. The regression coefficients are then applied to symptomatic changes from 2008–2012 to 2013–2017 to produce more recent and reasonable household size estimates for New York City’s neighborhoods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that employs a lagged model to predict PpH at the sub-county level, using a combination of administrative and 5-year ACS data.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Jacoby & Peter Lobo & Joseph J. Salvo, 2021. "Estimating Postcensal Household Size for NYC’s Neighborhoods," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(3), pages 459-474, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:40:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-020-09587-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-020-09587-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-020-09587-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-020-09587-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alejandrina Salcedo & Todd Schoellman & Michèle Tertilt, 2012. "Families as roommates: Changes in U.S. household size from 1850 to 2000," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 3(1), pages 133-175, March.
    2. Stanley Smith & Scott Cody, 2013. "Making the Housing Unit Method Work: An Evaluation of 2010 Population Estimates in Florida," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(2), pages 221-242, April.
    3. Stanley K. Smith & June M. Nogle, 2004. "An Evaluation of Hispanic Population Estimates," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(3), pages 731-745, September.
    4. David Swanson & Jerome McKibben, 2010. "New Directions in the Development of Population Estimates in the United States?," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 29(6), pages 797-818, December.
    5. Stanley Smith & June Nogle & Scott Cody, 2002. "A regression approach to estimating the average number of persons per household," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 39(4), pages 697-712, November.
    6. Stanley Smith & Bart Lewis, 1980. "Some new techniques for applying the housing unit method of local population estimation," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 17(3), pages 323-339, August.
    7. Thomas Burch, 1970. "Some demographic determinants of average household size: An analytic approach," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 7(1), pages 61-69, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Swanson & George Hough, 2012. "An Evaluation of Persons per Household (PPH) Estimates Generated by the American Community Survey: A Demographic Perspective," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 31(2), pages 235-266, April.
    2. Stanley Smith & Scott Cody, 2013. "Making the Housing Unit Method Work: An Evaluation of 2010 Population Estimates in Florida," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(2), pages 221-242, April.
    3. Peter A. Morrison & Brad Edmondson & Kristie Ferrantella & David Lockhart & Samantha Reis & Anna Tapp, 2020. "Estimating Nantucket’s Effective Population," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(3), pages 577-604, June.
    4. Greenwood, Jeremy & Guner, Nezih & Santos, Cezar & Kocharakov, Georgi, 2015. "Technology and the Changing Family: A Unified Model of Marriage, Divorce, Educational Attainment and Married Female Labor-Force," CEPR Discussion Papers 10434, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Gatskova, Kseniia & Kozlov, Vladimir, 2019. "Doubling Up or Moving Out? The Effect of International Labour Migration on Household Size," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 58(2), pages 162-179.
    6. Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner & Georgi Kocharkov & Cezar Santos, 2016. "Technology and the Changing Family: A Unified Model of Marriage, Divorce, Educational Attainment, and Married Female Labor-Force Participation," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-41, January.
    7. Emma Aguila & Jung Ho Park & Alma Vega, 2020. "Living Arrangements and Supplemental Income Programs for Older Adults in Mexico," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(4), pages 1345-1368, August.
    8. Juan Serrato & Philippe Wingender, 2016. "Estimating Local Fiscal Multipliers," Working Papers id:11109, eSocialSciences.
    9. Xi Chen, 2017. "Old age pension and intergenerational living arrangements: a regression discontinuity design," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 455-476, June.
    10. Doepke, M. & Tertilt, M., 2016. "Families in Macroeconomics," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1789-1891, Elsevier.
    11. Thomas Burch, 1980. "The index of overall headship: A simple measure of household complexity standardized for age and sex," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 17(1), pages 25-37, February.
    12. Jack Baker & Adelamar Alcantara & Xiaomin Ruan & Kendra Watkins & Srini Vasan, 2013. "A Comparative Evaluation of Error and Bias in Census Tract-Level Age/Sex-Specific Population Estimates: Component I (Net-Migration) vs Component III (Hamilton–Perry)," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(6), pages 919-942, December.
    13. Luca Pensieroso & Alessandro Sommacal, 2019. "Agriculture to Industry: the End of Intergenerational Coresidence," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 34, pages 87-102, October.
    14. Anders Fremstad, 2014. "Gains from Sharing: Sticky Norms, Endogenous Preferences, and the Economics of Shareable Goods," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2014-02, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    15. M Murphy, 1991. "Household Modelling and Forecasting—Dynamic Approaches with Use of Linked Census Data," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(6), pages 885-902, June.
    16. Bick, Alexander & Choi, Sekyu, 2013. "Revisiting the effect of household size on consumption over the life-cycle," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 2998-3011.
    17. Stanley Smith & Bart Lewis, 1983. "Some New Techniques for Applying the Housing Unit Method of Local Population Estimation: Further Evidence," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 20(3), pages 407-413, August.
    18. Qian Cai, 2007. "New techniques in small area population estimates by demographic characteristics," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 26(2), pages 203-218, April.
    19. Fatih Guvenen & Michelle Rendall, 2015. "Women's Emancipation through Education: A Macroeconomic Analysis," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 18(4), pages 931-956, October.
    20. de la Croix, David & Perrin, Faustine, 2018. "How far can economic incentives explain the French fertility and education transition?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 221-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:40:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-020-09587-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.