IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/policy/v57y2024i3d10.1007_s11077-024-09540-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consultancy firms’ roles in policy diffusion: a systematic review from the environmental governance field

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandra Burchard-Levine

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Dave Huitema

    (Wageningen University and Research)

  • Nicolas W. Jager

    (Wageningen University and Research)

  • Iris Bijlsma

    (Netherlands Enterprise and Development Agency (RVO))

Abstract

Since the 1980’s, the growing involvement of private consultancy firms in the public sector worldwide has instigated concerns about the outsourcing of public policy advising to market-driven actors. Although these firms participate in spreading policy ideas, their roles have not received sustained attention, despite being observed by a few scholars. Against this background, the aim of this paper is threefold. First, from established policy concepts relating to policy diffusion, we identify the potential roles that consultancy firms may take on in spreading policy ideas. Second, we use a systematic literature review to collect and distil what is currently known about what different roles consultancy firms fulfil, and what kinds of tensions arise in their interactions with both clients and other actors. Third, we draft an agenda for future research on consultancy firms’ impact in governance processes. To focus our study, our review hones in on environmental governance, more specifically water governance, a significant area of activity for such firms where they play an important in-between role in providing policy ideas. We found indications that consultancy firms possess six types of capabilities (trusted facilitators, reactors to environmental policies, shapers of environmental policies, market drivers, interest navigators, and managers of public participation), and face various dilemmas around biases, decontextualized global practices, market interests, and manipulative practices. We conclude that more attention should be given to empirically refining capabilities involved in shaping policies and markets and to further highlighting how consultancy firms impact the diffusion of governance ideas in and beyond the water and environmental sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandra Burchard-Levine & Dave Huitema & Nicolas W. Jager & Iris Bijlsma, 2024. "Consultancy firms’ roles in policy diffusion: a systematic review from the environmental governance field," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 691-718, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:57:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11077-024-09540-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11077-024-09540-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11077-024-09540-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11077-024-09540-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Clapp, 2005. "Global Environmental Governance for Corporate Responsibility and Accountability," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 5(3), pages 23-34, August.
    2. Dave Owen, 2021. "Private facilitators of public regulation: A study of the environmental consulting industry," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 226-242, January.
    3. Prabanga Thoradeniya & Aldónio Ferreira & Janet Lee & Rebecca Tan, 2020. "The diffusion of sustainability key performance indicators in a developing country context," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(5), pages 1246-1274, November.
    4. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2016. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 309-317.
    5. Emma Weitkamp & James Longhurst, 2012. "Mediating consultation: insights from private sector consultants involved in air quality consultations," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 113-125, April.
    6. Jérémie Sanchez, 2019. "Urban development falling into the gutter: sanitation planning and ‘anti-politics’ in Myanmar," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 2228-2245, December.
    7. Richard Mallett & Jessica Hagen-Zanker & Rachel Slater & Maren Duvendack, 2012. "The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 445-455, September.
    8. Sofie Bouteligier, 2011. "Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 43-61, March.
    9. Onna M. van den Broek & Robyn Klingler‐Vidra, 2022. "The UN Sustainable Development Goals as a North Star: How an intermediary network makes, takes, and retrofits the meaning of the Sustainable Development Goals," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1306-1324, October.
    10. Farhad Mukhtarov & Des Gasper & Aditya Alta & Neha Gautam & Maria Sattwika Duhita & Diego Hernández Morales, 2022. "From ‘merchants and ministers’ to ‘neutral brokers’? Water diplomacy aspirations by the Netherlands – a discourse analysis of the 2011 commissioned advisory report," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 1009-1031, November.
    11. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13776 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Pim Derwort & Nicolas Jager & Jens Newig, 2019. "Towards productive functions? A systematic review of institutional failure, its causes and consequences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 281-298, June.
    13. Sophie Webber & Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2020. "Wheeling Out Urban Resilience: Philanthrocapitalism, Marketization, and Local Practice," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(2), pages 343-363, June.
    14. Saint-Martin, Denis, 2004. "Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199269068.
    15. Ross Beveridge, 2012. "Consultants, depoliticization and arena-shifting in the policy process: privatizing water in Berlin," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 47-68, March.
    16. Rose, Richard, 1991. "What is Lesson-Drawing?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 3-30, January.
    17. Shahnoor Hasan & Jaap Evers & Arjen Zegwaard & Margreet Zwarteveen, 2019. "Making waves in the Mekong Delta: recognizing the work and the actors behind the transfer of Dutch delta planning expertise," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(9), pages 1583-1602, July.
    18. Andrea Armstrong & Douglas Jackson-Smith, 2019. "Privatization and inter-municipal cooperation in local stormwater planning and management," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(10), pages 1693-1713, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Althaus & Lisa Carson & Ken Smith, 2021. "Rethinking the commissioning of consultants for enhancing government policy capacity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 867-889, December.
    2. Carlo Rega & Alessandro Bonifazi, 2020. "The Rise of Resilience in Spatial Planning: A Journey through Disciplinary Boundaries and Contested Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Mulvaney, Dustin & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2014. "Zero-tolerance for genetic pollution: Rice farming, pharm rice, and the risks of coexistence in California," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 125-131.
    4. Mr. Alex Segura-Ubiergo & Miss Taline Koranchelian & Mr. Carlos Mulas-Granados, 2008. "Reforming Government Subsidies in the New Member States of the European Union," IMF Working Papers 2008/165, International Monetary Fund.
    5. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    6. Vairo, Daniela & Haring, Anna Maria & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2006. "Policies supporting organic food and farming in the EU: assessment and development by stakeholders in 11 European countries," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10109, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Parker, David, 2001. "Economic Regulation: A Preliminary Literature Review and Summary of Research Questions Arising," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30616, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    8. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Gabriela de Carvalho, 2022. "The World Bank and Healthcare Reforms: A Cross‐National Analysis of Policy Prescriptions in South America," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 5-18.
    10. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    11. Rachel Weber & Sara O’Neill-Kohl, 2013. "The Historical Roots of Tax Increment Financing, or How Real Estate Consultants Kept Urban Renewal Alive," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 27(3), pages 193-207, August.
    12. Raul Lejano & Savita Shankar, 2013. "The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, March.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Fernando Filgueiras & Pedro Palotti & Graziella G. Testa, 2023. "Complexing Governance Styles: Connecting Politics and Policy in Governance Theories," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    15. Haring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2005. "Stakeholder Assessment of Agricultural Policies and Development of Policy Instruments: A Cross-country Synthesis of National Policy Workshops in 11 European Countries," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24654, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.
    17. Craig W. Hutton & Oliver Hensengerth & Tristan Berchoux & Van P. D. Tri & Thi Tong & Nghia Hung & Hal Voepel & Stephen E. Darby & Duong Bui & Thi N. Bui & Nguyen Huy & Daniel Parsons, 2021. "Stakeholder Expectations of Future Policy Implementation Compared to Formal Policy Trajectories: Scenarios for Agricultural Food Systems in the Mekong Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Parsons, Kelly & Lang, Tim & Barling, David, 2021. "London’s food policy: Leveraging the policy sub-system, programme and plan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Marsden, Greg & Stead, Dominic, 2011. "Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 492-500, May.
    20. Savannah Cox, 2022. "Inscriptions of resilience: Bond ratings and the government of climate risk in Greater Miami, Florida," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 295-310, March.
    21. Karoline Steinbacher, 2015. "Drawing Lessons When Objectives Differ? Assessing Renewable Energy Policy Transfer from Germany to Morocco," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 34-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:57:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11077-024-09540-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.