IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/policy/v57y2024i3d10.1007_s11077-024-09540-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consultancy firms’ roles in policy diffusion: a systematic review from the environmental governance field

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandra Burchard-Levine

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Dave Huitema

    (Wageningen University and Research)

  • Nicolas W. Jager

    (Wageningen University and Research)

  • Iris Bijlsma

    (Netherlands Enterprise and Development Agency (RVO))

Abstract

Since the 1980’s, the growing involvement of private consultancy firms in the public sector worldwide has instigated concerns about the outsourcing of public policy advising to market-driven actors. Although these firms participate in spreading policy ideas, their roles have not received sustained attention, despite being observed by a few scholars. Against this background, the aim of this paper is threefold. First, from established policy concepts relating to policy diffusion, we identify the potential roles that consultancy firms may take on in spreading policy ideas. Second, we use a systematic literature review to collect and distil what is currently known about what different roles consultancy firms fulfil, and what kinds of tensions arise in their interactions with both clients and other actors. Third, we draft an agenda for future research on consultancy firms’ impact in governance processes. To focus our study, our review hones in on environmental governance, more specifically water governance, a significant area of activity for such firms where they play an important in-between role in providing policy ideas. We found indications that consultancy firms possess six types of capabilities (trusted facilitators, reactors to environmental policies, shapers of environmental policies, market drivers, interest navigators, and managers of public participation), and face various dilemmas around biases, decontextualized global practices, market interests, and manipulative practices. We conclude that more attention should be given to empirically refining capabilities involved in shaping policies and markets and to further highlighting how consultancy firms impact the diffusion of governance ideas in and beyond the water and environmental sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandra Burchard-Levine & Dave Huitema & Nicolas W. Jager & Iris Bijlsma, 2024. "Consultancy firms’ roles in policy diffusion: a systematic review from the environmental governance field," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 691-718, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:57:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11077-024-09540-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11077-024-09540-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11077-024-09540-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11077-024-09540-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Clapp, 2005. "Global Environmental Governance for Corporate Responsibility and Accountability," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 5(3), pages 23-34, August.
    2. Emma Weitkamp & James Longhurst, 2012. "Mediating consultation: insights from private sector consultants involved in air quality consultations," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 113-125, April.
    3. Richard Mallett & Jessica Hagen-Zanker & Rachel Slater & Maren Duvendack, 2012. "The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 445-455, September.
    4. Sofie Bouteligier, 2011. "Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 43-61, March.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13776 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Saint-Martin, Denis, 2004. "Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199269068.
    7. Andrea Armstrong & Douglas Jackson-Smith, 2019. "Privatization and inter-municipal cooperation in local stormwater planning and management," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(10), pages 1693-1713, August.
    8. Dave Owen, 2021. "Private facilitators of public regulation: A study of the environmental consulting industry," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 226-242, January.
    9. Prabanga Thoradeniya & Aldónio Ferreira & Janet Lee & Rebecca Tan, 2020. "The diffusion of sustainability key performance indicators in a developing country context," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(5), pages 1246-1274, November.
    10. Jérémie Sanchez, 2019. "Urban development falling into the gutter: sanitation planning and ‘anti-politics’ in Myanmar," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 2228-2245, December.
    11. Pim Derwort & Nicolas Jager & Jens Newig, 2019. "Towards productive functions? A systematic review of institutional failure, its causes and consequences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 281-298, June.
    12. Ross Beveridge, 2012. "Consultants, depoliticization and arena-shifting in the policy process: privatizing water in Berlin," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 47-68, March.
    13. Onna M. van den Broek & Robyn Klingler‐Vidra, 2022. "The UN Sustainable Development Goals as a North Star: How an intermediary network makes, takes, and retrofits the meaning of the Sustainable Development Goals," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1306-1324, October.
    14. Shahnoor Hasan & Jaap Evers & Arjen Zegwaard & Margreet Zwarteveen, 2019. "Making waves in the Mekong Delta: recognizing the work and the actors behind the transfer of Dutch delta planning expertise," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(9), pages 1583-1602, July.
    15. Feser, Daniel & Runst, Petrik, 2016. "Energy efficiency consultants as change agents? Examining the reasons for EECs’ limited success," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 309-317.
    16. Farhad Mukhtarov & Des Gasper & Aditya Alta & Neha Gautam & Maria Sattwika Duhita & Diego Hernández Morales, 2022. "From ‘merchants and ministers’ to ‘neutral brokers’? Water diplomacy aspirations by the Netherlands – a discourse analysis of the 2011 commissioned advisory report," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 1009-1031, November.
    17. Sophie Webber & Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2020. "Wheeling Out Urban Resilience: Philanthrocapitalism, Marketization, and Local Practice," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(2), pages 343-363, June.
    18. Rose, Richard, 1991. "What is Lesson-Drawing?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 3-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Althaus & Lisa Carson & Ken Smith, 2021. "Rethinking the commissioning of consultants for enhancing government policy capacity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 867-889, December.
    2. Mulvaney, Dustin & Krupnik, Timothy J., 2014. "Zero-tolerance for genetic pollution: Rice farming, pharm rice, and the risks of coexistence in California," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 125-131.
    3. Vairo, Daniela & Haring, Anna Maria & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2006. "Policies supporting organic food and farming in the EU: assessment and development by stakeholders in 11 European countries," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10109, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. So, Hau Wing & Lafortezza, Raffaele, 2022. "Reviewing the impacts of eco-labelling of forest products on different dimensions of sustainability in Europe," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Van Alstine, James & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "Business and development: Changing discourses in the extractive industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 4-16.
    6. Raul Lejano & Savita Shankar, 2013. "The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, March.
    7. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Fernando Filgueiras & Pedro Palotti & Graziella G. Testa, 2023. "Complexing Governance Styles: Connecting Politics and Policy in Governance Theories," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    9. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.
    10. Parsons, Kelly & Lang, Tim & Barling, David, 2021. "London’s food policy: Leveraging the policy sub-system, programme and plan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Peter J. May, 1999. "Fostering Policy Learning: A Challenge for Public Administration," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 21-31, June.
    13. Imran Zawwar & Shailesh Munankarmi, 2012. "International Policy Framework The Brand Personality," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 6(1), pages 101-112, December.
    14. Anna Lewczuk, 2021. "Are civil liberties contagious? Analysis of determinants of de facto civil rights protection in post-socialist countries," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 187-217, June.
    15. Vouzoulias Konstantinos & Koufioti Georgia & Kounios Athanasios & Vlachadi Maria, 2023. "The Inclusion of Sports Educational Activities in A Multicultural Educational Context. A Systematic Review of The Literature," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(4), pages 298-311, April.
    16. Palomo-Hierro, Sara & Loch, Adam & Pérez-Blanco, C. Dionisio, 2022. "Improving water markets in Spain: Lesson-drawing from the Murray-Darling Basin in Australia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    17. Julia Langbein, 2011. "Organizing Regulatory Convergence Outside the EU. Setting Policy-Specific Conditionality and Building Domestic Capacities," KFG Working Papers p0033, Free University Berlin.
    18. Devkar, Ganesh A. & Mahalingam, Ashwin & Deep, Akash & Thillairajan, A., 2013. "Impact of Private Sector Participation on access and quality in provision of electricity, telecom and water services in developing countries: A systematic review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 65-81.
    19. Haupt, Wolfgang & Eckersley, Peter & Kern, Kristine, 2021. "Transfer und Skalierung von lokaler Klimapolitik: Konzeptionelle Ansätze, Voraussetzungen und Potenziale," IRS Dialog 1/2021, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    20. Chapman Alexandra, 2018. "Playing catch-up? Adult social care in Northern Ireland," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 66(3), pages 99-115, August.
    21. Kabunga, Nassul Ssentamu & Ghosh, Shibani & Griffiths, Jeffrey K., 2014. "Can smallholder fruit and vegetable production systems improve household food security and nutritional status of women? Evidence from rural Uganda:," IFPRI discussion papers 1346, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    22. Heather MacDonald & Cozette Comer & Margaret Foster & Patrick R. Labelle & Scott Marsalis & Kate Nyhan & Zahra Premji & Morwenna Rogers & Ryan Splenda & Claire Stansfield & Sarah Young, 2024. "Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:57:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s11077-024-09540-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.