IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/policy/v54y2021i2d10.1007_s11077-021-09421-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatization of Canadian housing assistance: how bureaucrats on a budget added market-based progams to the toolbox

Author

Listed:
  • Maroine Bendaoud

    (National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy (NCCHPP))

Abstract

Social policy scholarship assumes that left-wing governments favour a stronger public provision of services, while right-wing politics promote privatization, largely as a matter of ideology. Yet the findings on Canadian provinces’ market-based housing instruments suggest that alternative views are possible. Left-leaning governments introduced private delivery mechanisms for economic as well as non-economic reasons. The archival research and thematic analysis of interview responses with key actors (n = 56) suggest that the introduction of housing allowances in the policy toolbox largely results from bureaucratic initiatives, regardless of the party in power. Rather than political forces or advocacy by power interests, this policy change is mostly driven by considerations of equity and efficiency on the part of officials ‘muddling through’. The concept is revisited in the final discussion, where important strands of the privatization literature are challenged, as well as the political assumptions associated with the notion of users’ freedom.

Suggested Citation

  • Maroine Bendaoud, 2021. "Privatization of Canadian housing assistance: how bureaucrats on a budget added market-based progams to the toolbox," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(2), pages 423-440, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:54:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11077-021-09421-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11077-021-09421-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11077-021-09421-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11077-021-09421-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morgan, Kimberly J. & Campbell, Andrea Louise, 2011. "The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of Social Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199730353.
    2. Julian Le Grand, 2007. "Introduction to The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition," Introductory Chapters, in: The Other Invisible Hand: Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition, Princeton University Press.
    3. Fredriksson, Mio, 2013. "Is patient choice democratizing Swedish primary care?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 95-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norman Gemmell & Patrick Nolan & Grant Scobie, 2017. "Public sector productivity: Quality adjusting sector-level data on New Zealand schools," Working Papers 2017/02, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    2. Schmidt, Henrike & Wild, Eva-Maria & Schreyögg, Jonas, 2021. "Explaining variation in health information seeking behaviour – Insights from a multilingual survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 618-626.
    3. Koen Verhoest & Paola Mattei, 2010. "Special Issue on ‘Welfare governance reforms and effects in the Post-Golden Age’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 163-171, March.
    4. Cooper, Zack & Gibbons, Stephen & Skellern, Matthew, 2018. "Does competition from private surgical centres improve public hospitals' performance? Evidence from the English National Health Service," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 63-80.
    5. Heller-Sahlgren, Gabriel, 2018. "Smart but unhappy: Independent-school competition and the wellbeing-efficiency trade-off in education," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 66-81.
    6. Elliott, Rebecca, 2024. "The state and the state-of-the-art: prefiguring private insurance for U.S. flood risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122392, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Besley, Timothy & Malcomson, James M., 2018. "Competition in public service provision: The role of not-for-profit providers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 158-172.
    8. Alessandro Petretto, 2013. "On the Fuzzy Boundaries between Public and Private in Health-Care Organization and Funding Systems," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, issue 1, pages 327-370, January-M.
    9. Brad R. Taylor, 2016. "Exit and the Epistemic Quality of Voice," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 133-144, June.
    10. Mennini, Francesco Saverio & Gitto, Lara & Russo, Simone & Cicchetti, Americo & Ruggeri, Matteo & Coretti, Silvia & Maurelli, Guido & Buscema, Paolo Massimo, 2017. "Does regional belonging explain the similarities in the expenditure determinants of Italian healthcare deliveries?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 47-56.
    11. Enrico Colombatto, 2011. "Is there a health-care problem in Western societies?," ICER Working Papers 14-2011, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    12. Claire Callender & Kevin J. Dougherty, 2018. "Student Choice in Higher Education—Reducing or Reproducing Social Inequalities?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Nicole P Marwell, 2016. "Rethinking the state in urban outcasts," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1095-1098, May.
    14. Jolanki, Outi & Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa, 2018. "Primary health care nurses’ views on patients’ abilities and resources to make choices and take decisions on health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(9), pages 957-962.
    15. Vladimir S. Osipov & Tatiana V. Skryl & Ekaterina A. Blinova & Michael E. Kosov, 2017. "Dysfunctions of Public Administration System: Analysis of Institutional Reforms," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 123-129.
    16. Charles Crabtree & John B. Holbein & J. Quin Monson, 2022. "Patient traits shape health-care stakeholders’ choices on how to best allocate life-saving care," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 244-257, February.
    17. John Clayton & Catherine Donovan & Jacqui Merchant, 2016. "Distancing and limited resourcefulness: Third sector service provision under austerity localism in the north east of England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(4), pages 723-740, March.
    18. Sebastian Jilke & Steven Van de Walle, 2013. "Two track public services? Citizens' voice behaviour towards liberalized services in the EU15," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 465-476, May.
    19. Ranerup, Agneta & Norén, Lars, 2015. "How are citizens’ public service choices supported in quasi-markets?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 527-537.
    20. Adrienne Davidson & Samantha Burns & Linda White & Delaine Hampton & Michal Perlman, 2020. "Child care policy and child care burden: Policy feedback effects and distributive implications of regulatory decisions," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:policy:v:54:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11077-021-09421-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.