IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v32y2021i1d10.1007_s11002-021-09555-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How common is new product failure and when does it vary?

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten Victory

    (University of South Australia)

  • Magda Nenycz-Thiel

    (University of South Australia)

  • John Dawes

    (University of South Australia)

  • Arry Tanusondjaja

    (University of South Australia)

  • Armando Maria Corsi

    (University of South Australia)

Abstract

This study aims to explore how common new product failure is in consumer packaged goods (CPG) categories and investigate the conditions in which the new product failure rate varies. This study analyzes 83,719 new stock-keeping units (SKUs), which were introduced over 8 years (2002–2009) across 31 CPG categories in the USA. Failure is the permanent cessation of sales, which is measured in consumer panel data. We find that one in four (25%) new SKUs are no longer bought 1 year later—a rate that increases to approximately 40% 2 years post-launch. New SKU failure was more likely for new launches that were introduced into higher revenue categories and by smaller share parent brands. Our findings can be used as a resource to aid marketing practitioners’ understanding regarding how common failure is for new CPGs and when there is greater associated risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten Victory & Magda Nenycz-Thiel & John Dawes & Arry Tanusondjaja & Armando Maria Corsi, 2021. "How common is new product failure and when does it vary?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 17-32, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:32:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-021-09555-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-021-09555-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-021-09555-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-021-09555-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart J. Bronnenberg & Michael W. Kruger & Carl F. Mela, 2008. "—The IRI Marketing Data Set," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 745-748, 07-08.
    2. John Dawes & Bryon Sharp & Malcom Wrigth & Carl Driesener & Lars Meyer-Waarden & Lara Stocchi & Philip Stern, 2012. "It's a Dirichlet World: Modeling Individuals' Loyalties Reveals How Brands Compete, Grow, and Decline," Post-Print halshs-00862211, HAL.
    3. Abril, Carmen & Sanchez, Joaquin, 2016. "Will they return? Getting private label consumers to come back: Price, promotion, and new product effects," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 109-116.
    4. Paul Farris & James Olver & Cornelis De Kluyver, 1989. "The Relationship Between Distribution and Market Share," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 107-128.
    5. Patrick Barwise, 1995. "Good Empirical Generalizations," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 29-35.
    6. Wilbur, Kenneth C. & Farris, Paul W., 2014. "Distribution and Market Share," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 154-167.
    7. Tauber, Edward M., 1981. "Brand franchise extension: New product benefits from existing Brand Names," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 36-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sharp, Byron & Dawes, John & Victory, Kirsten, 2024. "The market-based assets theory of brand competition," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Michael Klein & Fuat Sener, 2023. "Product Innovation, Diffusion and Endogenous Growth," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 48, pages 178-201, April.
    3. Freisinger, Elena & McCarthy, Ian P., 2024. "What fails and when? A process view of innovation failure," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Michael Klein & Fuat Sener, 2023. "Product Innovation, Diffusion and Endogenous Growth," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 48, pages 178-201, April.
    5. Andreas Hesse & Karolin Bündgen & Saskia Claren & Sarah Frank, 2022. "Practices of brand extensions and how consumers respond to FMCG giants’ greening attempts," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(6), pages 520-537, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharp, Byron & Dawes, John & Victory, Kirsten, 2024. "The market-based assets theory of brand competition," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    2. Richard Friberg & Mark Sanctuary, 2017. "The Effect of Retail Distribution on Sales of Alcoholic Beverages," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 626-641, July.
    3. Antonis A. Michis, 2023. "Retail distribution evaluation in brand-level sales response models," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(3), pages 366-378, September.
    4. Zachary Anesbury & Maxwell Winchester & Rachel Kennedy, 2017. "Brand user profiles seldom change and seldom differ," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 523-535, December.
    5. Guissoni, Leandro Angotti & Rodrigues, Jonny Mateus & Zambaldi, Felipe & Neves, Marcos Fava, 2021. "Distribution effectiveness through full- and self-service channels under economic fluctuations in an emerging market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 545-560.
    6. Dawes, John & Meyer-Waarden, Lars & Driesener, Carl, 2015. "Has brand loyalty declined? A longitudinal analysis of repeat purchase behavior in the UK and the USA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 425-432.
    7. Dawes, John, 2014. "Cigarette brand loyalty and purchase patterns: An examination using US consumer panel data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1933-1943.
    8. Dawes, John, 2022. "Factors that influence manufacturer and store brand behavioral loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Ailawadi, Kusum L. & Farris, Paul W., 2017. "Managing Multi- and Omni-Channel Distribution: Metrics and Research Directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 120-135.
    10. Tanusondjaja, Arry & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Dawes, John & Kennedy, Rachel, 2018. "Portfolios: Patterns in brand penetration, market share, and hero product variants," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 211-217.
    11. Hirche, Martin & Greenacre, Luke & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Loose, Simone & Lockshin, Larry, 2021. "SKU performance and distribution: A large-scale analysis of the role of product characteristics with store scanner data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Hirche, Martin & Farris, Paul W. & Greenacre, Luke & Quan, Yiran & Wei, Susan, 2021. "Predicting Under- and Overperforming SKUs within the Distribution–Market Share Relationship," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(4), pages 697-714.
    13. Kumar, V. & Sunder, Sarang & Sharma, Amalesh, 2015. "Leveraging Distribution to Maximize Firm Performance in Emerging Markets," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 627-643.
    14. Laurent Cavenaile & Pau Roldan-Blanco, 2021. "Advertising, Innovation, and Economic Growth," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 251-303, July.
    15. Sandra J. Milberg, 2001. "Positive Feedback Effects Of Brand Extensions: Expanding Brand Meaning And The Range Of Extendibility," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(1), pages 3-35.
    16. Jungju Yu, 2021. "A Model of Brand Architecture Choice: A House of Brands vs. A Branded House," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 147-167, January.
    17. Wesley R. Hartmann & Daniel Klapper, 2018. "Super Bowl Ads," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(1), pages 78-96, January.
    18. Marusia Ivanova, 2007. "Genesis and Evolution of Market Share Predictive Models," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 117-148.
    19. Özge Sýðýrcý & A. Müge Yalçýn, 2010. "Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations Of Brand Extensions," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 67-90.
    20. Song Lin & Juanjuan Zhang & John R. Hauser, 2015. "Learning from Experience, Simply," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:32:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11002-021-09555-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.