IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v31y2020i2d10.1007_s11002-020-09516-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Touch vs. click: how computer interfaces polarize consumers’ evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Wang

    (College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)

  • Hean Tat Keh

    (Monash Business School, Monash University)

  • Hongrui Zhao

    (College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)

  • Yijie Ai

    (College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

Increasingly powerful computer technologies have enabled the development and widespread growth of touchscreen devices such as computers, tablets, and smartphones in consumers’ daily lives, including online shopping. Nonetheless, it is not clear to what extent and how direct-touch (i.e., finger) vs. indirect-touch (e.g., mouse click or stylus) interfaces have differential effects on consumers’ evaluations toward the object on the screen. Results from a lab experiment and a field study indicate that a direct-touch (vs. indirect-touch) interface has a polarizing effect on consumer evaluations. For an object about which consumers have a prior positive attitude, a direct-touch interface enhances consumer evaluations; for an object about which consumers have a prior negative attitude, a direct-touch interface lowers consumer evaluations. We find that consumers’ visual information processing style can moderate the polarizing effect. In addition, the polarizing effect can be explained by consumers’ vividness perception. These findings make useful contributions to the literature on haptic effects and human-computer interactions, as well as have significant managerial implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Wang & Hean Tat Keh & Hongrui Zhao & Yijie Ai, 2020. "Touch vs. click: how computer interfaces polarize consumers’ evaluations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 265-277, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:31:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11002-020-09516-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-020-09516-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-020-09516-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-020-09516-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Jin & Keh, Hean Tat & Lee, Angela Y., 2019. "Shaping consumer preference using alignable attributes: The roles of regulatory orientation and construal level," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 151-168.
    2. Zhu, Ying & Meyer, Jeffrey, 2017. "Getting in touch with your thinking style: How touchscreens influence purchase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 51-58.
    3. Childers, Terry L & Houston, Michael J & Heckler, Susan E, 1985. "Measurement of Individual Differences in Visual versus Verbal Information Processing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(2), pages 125-134, September.
    4. Boyoun (Grace) Chae & JoAndrea Hoegg, 2013. "The Future Looks "Right": Effects of the Horizontal Location of Advertising Images on Product Attitude," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 223-238.
    5. Hao Shen & Yuwei Jiang & Rashmi Adaval, 2010. "Contrast and Assimilation Effects of Processing Fluency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(5), pages 876-889, February.
    6. Ryan S. Elder & Aradhna Krishna, 2012. "The "Visual Depiction Effect" in Advertising: Facilitating Embodied Mental Simulation through Product Orientation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 988-1003.
    7. Yuwei Jiang & Gerald J. Gorn & Maria Galli & Amitava Chattopadhyay, 2016. "Does Your Company Have the Right Logo? How and Why Circular- and Angular-Logo Shapes Influence Brand Attribute Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(5), pages 709-726.
    8. Joann Peck & Suzanne B. Shu, 2009. "The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 434-447.
    9. Schlosser, Ann E, 2003. "Experiencing Products in the Virtual World: The Role of Goal and Imagery in Influencing Attitudes versus Purchase Intentions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 184-198, September.
    10. Peck, Joann & Childers, Terry L, 2003. "Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The "Need for Touch" Scale," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(3), pages 430-442, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yunxin, 2023. "Digital exposure to unhealthy food reduces subsequent consumption of unhealthy food," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Johannes D. Hattula & Walter Herzog & Ravi Dhar, 2023. "The impact of touchscreen devices on consumers’ choice confidence and purchase likelihood," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 35-53, March.
    3. Liu, Yunxin, 2023. "How and why a touchscreen interface impacts psychological ownership and its downstream consequences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Racat, Margot & Capelli, Sonia & Lichy, Jessica, 2021. "New insights into ‘technologies of touch’: Information processing in product evaluation and purchase intention," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    2. Pino, Giovanni & Amatulli, Cesare & Nataraajan, Rajan & De Angelis, Matteo & Peluso, Alessandro M. & Guido, Gianluigi, 2020. "Product touch in the real and digital world: How do consumers react?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 492-501.
    3. Krishna, Aradhna & Cian, Luca & Aydınoğlu, Nilüfer Z., 2017. "Sensory Aspects of Package Design," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 43-54.
    4. Tim Hilken & Ko de Ruyter & Mathew Chylinski & Dominik Mahr & Debbie I. Keeling, 2017. "Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 884-905, November.
    5. Haiyang Huang & Yuanyuan Cai & Lisha Xu, 2021. "Stability or instability: the impact of brand concepts on logo design preferences," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(5), pages 465-480, September.
    6. Liu, Yunxin, 2023. "How and why a touchscreen interface impacts psychological ownership and its downstream consequences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Petit, Olivia & Velasco, Carlos & Spence, Charles, 2019. "Digital Sensory Marketing: Integrating New Technologies Into Multisensory Online Experience," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 42-61.
    8. Aparna Sundar & James J. Kellaris, 2017. "How Logo Colors Influence Shoppers’ Judgments of Retailer Ethicality: The Mediating Role of Perceived Eco-Friendliness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 685-701, December.
    9. Ryan Rahinel & Noelle M. Nelson, 2016. "When Brand Logos Describe the Environment: Design Instability and the Utility of Safety-Oriented Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 478-496.
    10. Zheng, Chundong & Qian, Fangyuan & Song, Jiehang & Wang, Han, 2024. "Make the photo in good shape: The matching effect of photo shapes and donation appeals on donation intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Shi, Savannah Wei & Kalyanam, Kirthi, 2018. "Touchable Apps: Exploring the Usage of Touch Features and Their Impact on Engagement," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 43-59.
    12. Pathak, Kanishka & Prakash, Gyan, 2023. "Exploring the role of augmented reality in purchase intention: Through flow and immersive experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Blömker, Jan & Albrecht, Carmen-Maria, 2024. "Psychographic segmentation of multichannel customers: investigating the influence of individual differences on channel choice and switching behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Petit, Olivia & Spence, Charles & Velasco, Carlos & Woods, Andy T. & Cheok, Adrian D., 2017. "Changing the influence of portion size on consumer behavior via imagined consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 240-248.
    15. Madzharov, Adriana V., 2019. "Self-Control and Touch: When Does Direct Versus Indirect Touch Increase Hedonic Evaluations and Consumption of Food," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 170-185.
    16. Pantoja, Felipe & Borges, Adilson & Rossi, Patricia & Yamim, Amanda Pruski, 2020. "If I touch it, I will like it! The role of tactile inputs on gustatory perceptions of food items," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    17. Liu, Yunxin, 2023. "Digital exposure to unhealthy food reduces subsequent consumption of unhealthy food," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Ringler, Christine & Sirianni, Nancy J. & Gustafsson, Anders & Peck, Joann, 2019. "Look but Don’t Touch! The Impact of Active Interpersonal Haptic Blocking on Compensatory Touch and Purchase Behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 186-203.
    19. Mulcahy, Rory Francis & Riedel, Aimee S., 2020. "‘Touch it, swipe it, shake it’: Does the emergence of haptic touch in mobile retailing advertising improve its effectiveness?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Rosa, José Antonio & Qualls, William J. & Ruth, Julie A., 2014. "Consumer creativity: Effects of gender and variation in the richness of vision and touch inputs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 386-393.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:31:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s11002-020-09516-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.