IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v26y2015i3p245-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Bergkvist

Abstract

In their article, Bergkvist and Rossiter (Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175–184, 2007 ) recommended marketing academics to use single-item instead of multiple-item measures for doubly concrete constructs. This recommendation was based on a study showing that the predictive validity of single-item measures was comparable to that of multiple-item measures. Kamakura ( 2014 ) presents three criticisms of Bergkvist and Rossiter’s study: (1) The correlations used to evaluate predictive validity are inflated by the presence of common-methods variance in the data, (2) the study used concurrent validity as criterion rather than predictive validity, and (3) the multiple-item measures in the study were not corrected for attenuation. A re-analysis of the data from the original study refutes the claims made by Kamakura ( 2014 ). The analysis shows that the common-methods variance in the data was negligible and that predicting delayed measures rather than concurrent measures yielded virtually identical results as in the original study. It is also shown that it is possible to estimate single-item reliabilities and correct single-item measures for attenuation, which makes them as predictively valid as multiple-item measures. Thus, there is no reason to change the conclusions and recommendations made in Bergkvist and Rossiter’s (Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175–184, 2007 ) article. The present article also shows that Kamakura’s ( 2014 ) analysis of consumer panel data has limitations which casts doubts upon the conclusions drawn from the analysis results. In addition, there is a discussion of the cost, in terms of research quality, that researchers unnecessarily using multiple-items measures pay. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Bergkvist, 2015. "Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 245-255, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:245-255
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    2. John R. Rossiter, 2011. "Measurement for the Social Sciences," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-1-4419-7158-6, July.
    3. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    2. Morteza Ghobakhloo & Masood Fathi, 2019. "Modeling the Success of Application-Based Mobile Banking," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Hepola, Janne & Leppäniemi, Matti & Karjaluoto, Heikki, 2020. "Is it all about consumer engagement? Explaining continuance intention for utilitarian and hedonic service consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    5. Junwei Zheng & Guangdong Wu, 2018. "Work-Family Conflict, Perceived Organizational Support and Professional Commitment: A Mediation Mechanism for Chinese Project Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Riham Al Aina & Tarik Atan, 2020. "The Impact of Implementing Talent Management Practices on Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Brocato, E. Deanne & Voorhees, Clay M. & Baker, Julie, 2012. "Understanding the Influence of Cues from Other Customers in the Service Experience: A Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 384-398.
    8. Sun, Jonghak & Teng, James T.C., 2017. "The construct of information systems use benefits: Theoretical explication of its underlying dimensions and the development of a measurement scale," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 400-416.
    9. Svante Andersson & Göran Svensson & Francisco‐Jose Molina‐Castillo & Carmen Otero‐Neira & John Lindgren & Niklas P. E. Karlsson & Hélène Laurell, 2022. "Sustainable development—Direct and indirect effects between economic, social, and environmental dimensions in business practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1158-1172, September.
    10. Bag, Surajit & Rahman, Muhammad Sabbir & Srivastava, Gautam & Chan, Hau-Ling & Bryde, David J., 2022. "The role of big data and predictive analytics in developing a resilient supply chain network in the South African mining industry against extreme weather events," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    11. Soumya Ray & Sung S. Kim & James G. Morris, 2012. "Research Note ---Online Users' Switching Costs: Their Nature and Formation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 197-213, March.
    12. Lee, Craig & Hallak, Rob, 2018. "Investigating the moderating role of education on a structural model of restaurant performance using multi-group PLS-SEM analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 298-305.
    13. Phong Nguyen, Nguyen & Adomako, Samuel & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2023. "The base-of- the-pyramid orientation and export performance of Vietnamese small and medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. O'Cass, Aron & Siahtiri, Vida, 2013. "In search of status through brands from Western and Asian origins: Examining the changing face of fashion clothing consumption in Chinese young adults," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 505-515.
    15. Rossiter, John R. & Braithwaite, Bradley, 2013. "C-OAR-SE-based single-item measures for the two-stage Technology Acceptance Model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 30-35.
    16. Ludwig Christian Schaupp & Lemuria Carter, 2010. "The impact of trust, risk and optimism bias on E-file adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 299-309, July.
    17. Maduku, Daniel K. & Thusi, Philile, 2023. "Understanding consumers' mobile shopping continuance intention: New perspectives from South Africa," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. John D'Arcy & Anat Hovav & Dennis Galletta, 2009. "User Awareness of Security Countermeasures and Its Impact on Information Systems Misuse: A Deterrence Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 79-98, March.
    19. Finn, Adam & Wang, Luming, 2014. "Formative vs. reflective measures: Facets of variation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2821-2826.
    20. Laguir, Issam & Stekelorum, Rébecca & El Baz, Jamal, 2021. "Proactive environmental strategy and performances of third party logistics providers (TPLs): Investigating the role of eco-control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:26:y:2015:i:3:p:245-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.