IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jtecht/v7y1983i2p15-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organization structure as a factor in innovation: A review of the literature

Author

Listed:
  • Kristin Mercer

Abstract

There are several approaches to the organization of an activity. Some of the better known methods are by function, project or a matrix. Each of these methods is investigated in terms of its effect on innovation. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of each are discussed. All discussion is carefully supported by reference to current literature. Copyright the Technology Transfer Society 1983

Suggested Citation

  • Kristin Mercer, 1983. "Organization structure as a factor in innovation: A review of the literature," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 15-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:7:y:1983:i:2:p:15-20
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02620776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02620776
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02620776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Shepard, 1967. "Innovation-Resisting and Innovation-Producing Organizations," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40, pages 470-470.
    2. M. Sagal, 1977. "Effective technology transfer — from laboratory to production line," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 7-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li-Min Chuang & Wen-Chia Tsai, 2014. "The Organizational Innovativeness Inventory for information and electronic enterprises: Development and Validation," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 6(4), pages 302-309.
    2. Maximilian A. Maier & Alexander Brem, 2018. "What innovation managers really do: a multiple-case investigation into the informal role profiles of innovation managers," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1055-1080, October.
    3. Arie Y. Lewin & Henk W. Volberda, 1999. "Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(5), pages 519-534, October.
    4. Dennys Eduardo Rossetto & Roberto Carlos Bernardes & Felipe Mendes Borini & Cristiane Chaves Gattaz, 2018. "Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(3), pages 1329-1363, June.
    5. Muhamad Jantan & Aizzat Mohd Nasurdin & Nur Fitriah Ahmed Fadzil, 2003. "Designing Innovative Organizations in Malaysia: Do Structure and Culture Matter?," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 213-226, August.
    6. Joseph S. Schultz & Endre Sjøvold & Beate André, 2017. "Can formal innovation training improve group- and organizational-level innovativeness in a healthcare setting?," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Les Oxley & Shangqin Hong & Philip McCann, 2013. "Beyond ‘the Beamer, the boat and the bach’? A Content Analysis-Based Case Study of New Zealand Innovative Firms," Working Papers in Economics 13/12, University of Waikato.
    8. Frederik M. Metzger & Stefan Berwing & Thomas Armbrüster & Achim Oberg, 2012. "Koordinationsmechanismen und Innovativität von Netzwerken: eine empirische Analyse," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 428-455, June.
    9. J. P. Eggers, 2016. "Reversing course: Competing technologies, mistakes, and renewal in flat panel displays," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1578-1596, August.
    10. Augsdorfer, Peter, 2005. "Bootlegging and path dependency," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Peter Augsdorfer, 2012. "A Diagnostic Personality Test To Identify Likely Corporate Bootleg Researchers," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-18.
    12. Schewe, Gerhard, 1991. "Key factors of successful innovation management," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 274, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:7:y:1983:i:2:p:15-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.