IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jtecht/v25y2000i2p169-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Successful Technology Commercialization Teams: Pilot Empirical Support for the Theory of Cascading Commitment

Author

Listed:
  • Large, David
  • Belinko, Keith
  • Kalligatsi, Katerina

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Large, David & Belinko, Keith & Kalligatsi, Katerina, 2000. "Building Successful Technology Commercialization Teams: Pilot Empirical Support for the Theory of Cascading Commitment," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 169-180, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:25:y:2000:i:2:p:169-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0892-9912/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Monika Jakubiak & Pawel Chrapownicki, 2018. "Determinants of science-business cooperation in pharmaceutical production – case study (Determinanty wspolpracy nauki i biznesu w branzy farmaceutycznej – case study)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 2(28), pages 7-14.
    2. Ani Gerbin & Mateja Drnovsek, 2016. "Determinants and public policy implications of academic-industry knowledge transfer in life sciences: a review and a conceptual framework," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 979-1076, October.
    3. Markus A. Kirchberger & Larissa Pohl, 2016. "Technology commercialization: a literature review of success factors and antecedents across different contexts," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 1077-1112, October.
    4. Grzegorczyk Małgorzata, 2016. "Relational Benefits and Quality of Relation — Towards Understanding of the Ties Between Science and Business," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:25:y:2000:i:2:p:169-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.