Dual process theories: A key for understanding the diversification bias?
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-007-9008-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Arkes, Hal R. & Dawes, Robyn M. & Christensen, Caryn, 1986. "Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 93-110, February.
- Loomes, Graham, 1998. "Probabilities vs Money: A Test of Some Fundamental Assumptions about Rational Decision Making," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(447), pages 477-489, March.
- Rubinstein, Ariel, 2002. "Irrational diversification in multiple decision problems," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1369-1378, September.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Natalie A. Obrecht & Dana L. Chesney, 2016. "Prompting deliberation increases base-rate use," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, January.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:1-6 is not listed on IDEAS
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Yaron Azrieli & Christopher P. Chambers & Paul J. Healy, 2020.
"Incentives in experiments with objective lotteries,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-29, March.
- Paul J. Healy & Yaron Azrieli & Christopher P. Chambers, 2016. "Incentives in Experiments with Objective Lotteries," Working Papers 16-04, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
- Yaron Azrieli & Christopher P. Chambers & Paul J. Healy, 2018.
"Incentives in Experiments: A Theoretical Analysis,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(4), pages 1472-1503.
- Paul J. Healy & Yaron Azrieli & Christopher P. Chambers, 2016. "Incentives in Experiments: A Theoretical Analysis," Working Papers 16-03, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
- Vital Anderhub & Simon Gächter & Manfred Königstein, 2002.
"Efficient Contracting and Fair Play in a Simple Principal-Agent Experiment,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 5-27, June.
- Vital Anderhub & Simon Gaechter & Manfred Koenigstein, "undated". "Efficient Contracting and Fair Play in a Simple Principal-Agent Experiment," IEW - Working Papers 018, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Anderhub, Vital & Gächter, Simon & Königstein, Manfred, 1999. "Efficient contracting and fair play in a simple principal-agent experiment," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1999,82, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
- John Gathergood & Neale Mahoney & Neil Stewart & Jörg Weber, 2019.
"How Do Individuals Repay Their Debt? The Balance-Matching Heuristic,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(3), pages 844-875, March.
- John Gathergood & Neale Mahoney & Neil Stewart & Joerg Weber, 2017. "How Do Individuals Repay Their Debt? The Balance-Matching Heuristic," NBER Working Papers 24161, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Glover, Steven M. & Prawitt, Douglas F. & Spilker, Brian C., 1997. "The Influence of Decision Aids on User Behavior: Implications for Knowledge Acquisition and Inappropriate Reliance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 232-255, November.
- Sofianos, Andis, 2022. "Self-reported & revealed trust: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
- Kirchkamp, Oliver & Oechssler, Joerg & Sofianos, Andis, 2021.
"The Binary Lottery Procedure does not induce risk neutrality in the Holt & Laury and Eckel & Grossman tasks,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 348-369.
- Oechssler, Jörg & Sofianos, Andis, 2019. "The Binary Lottery Procedure does not induce risk neutrality in the Holt-Laury and Eckel-Grossman tasks," Working Papers 0663, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Benjamin Enke & Uri Gneezy & Brian Hall & David Martin & Vadim Nelidov & Theo Offerman & Jeroen van de Ven, 2020.
"Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
8168, CESifo.
- Benjamin Enke & Uri Gneezy & Brian Hall & David C. Martin & Vadim Nelidov & Theo Offerman & Jeroen van de Ven, 2021. "Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?," NBER Working Papers 28650, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Shepherd, Dean A. & Zacharakis, Andrew, 2002. "Venture capitalists' expertise: A call for research into decision aids and cognitive feedback," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
- Dwenger, Nadja & Kübler, Dorothea & Weizsäcker, Georg, 2014.
"Flipping a coin: Theory and evidence,"
Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior
SP II 2013-201r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Nadja Dwenger & Dorothea Kübler & Georg Weizsäcker, 2014. "Flipping a Coin: Theory and Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 4740, CESifo.
- Rivas, Javier, 2013.
"Probability matching and reinforcement learning,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 17-21.
- Javier Rivas, 2011. "Probability Matching and Reinforcement Learning," Discussion Papers in Economics 11/20, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
- Gregory DeAngelo & Gary Charness, 2012. "Deterrence, expected cost, uncertainty and voting: Experimental evidence," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 73-100, February.
- Nadja Dwenger & Dorothea Kübler & Georg Weizsäcker, 2013.
"Preference for Randomization: Empirical and Experimental Evidence,"
SFB 649 Discussion Papers
SFB649DP2013-004, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
- Dwenger, Nadja & Kübler, Dorothea & Weizsäcker, Georg, 2013. "Preference for randomization: Empirical and experimental evidence," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
- Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2003. "Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 337-386, December.
- Yael Karlinsky-Shichor & Oded Netzer, 2024. "Automating the B2B Salesperson Pricing Decisions: A Human-Machine Hybrid Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 138-157, January.
- Peter Wakker & Veronika Köbberling & Christiane Schwieren, 2007. "Prospect-theory’s Diminishing Sensitivity Versus Economics’ Intrinsic Utility of Money: How the Introduction of the Euro can be Used to Disentangle the Two Empirically," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 205-231, November.
- Di Caprio, Debora & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J., 2011. "Cardinal versus ordinal criteria in choice under risk with disconnected utility ranges," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4-5), pages 588-594.
- Lawrence, Michael & Sim, William, 1999. "Prototyping a financial DSS," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 445-450, August.
- Qi, Tianxiao & Xu, Bin & Wu, Jinshan & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2022.
"On the Stochasticity of Ultimatum Games,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 227-254.
- Tianxiao Qi & Bin Xu & Jinshan Wu & Nicolaas J. Vriend, 2021. "On the Stochasticity of Ultimatum Games," Working Papers 926, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
- Gomaa, Mohamed I. & Hunton, James E. & Vaassen, Eddy H.J. & Carree, Martin A., 2011. "Decision aid reliance: Modeling the effects of decision aid reliability and pressures to perform on reliance behavior," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 206-224.
More about this item
Keywords
Dual process theories; Diversification; Probability matching; Statistical independence; D83; D81;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
- D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:34:y:2007:i:2:p:145-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.