IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jcopol/v36y2013i1p37-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Content Contracts for Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • N. Helberger
  • M. Loos
  • Lucie Guibault
  • Chantal Mak
  • Lodewijk Pessers

Abstract

The application of consumer law to digital content contracts encounters a number of obstacles. Some of these are rather typical for digital content markets, e.g., the legal consequences of the classification of digital content as “goods” or “services” and, more importantly, the absence of general benchmarks to evaluate the conformity of digital content. Other problems, such as the limited usefulness of consumer information and the position of underage consumers, are not as such reserved to digital consumers, but they are amplified in the digital content markets. Moreover, particular attention is paid to the complex relationship between copyright law and consumer law. This paper explores the extent to which consumer (contract) law is fit to address the problems faced by digital consumers wishing to enjoy the benefits of digital content and examines whether the on-going initiatives at national and European level are likely to provide relief. Finally, recommendations for improvement are put forward in cases where the analysis shows that the problems identified are not or are insufficiently solved by these initiatives. Copyright The Author(s) 2013

Suggested Citation

  • N. Helberger & M. Loos & Lucie Guibault & Chantal Mak & Lodewijk Pessers, 2013. "Digital Content Contracts for Consumers," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 37-57, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:36:y:2013:i:1:p:37-57
    DOI: 10.1007/s10603-012-9201-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10603-012-9201-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10603-012-9201-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helberger, Natali & Kerényi, Kristóf & Krings, Bettina & Lambers, Rik & Orwat, Carsten & Riehm, Ulrich & van Gompel, Stef & Dufft, Nicole, 2004. "Digital Rights Management and Consumer Acceptability: A Multi-Disciplinary Discussion of Consumer Concerns and Expectations," MPRA Paper 6641, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2004.
    2. Yannis Bakos & Florencia Marotta-Wurgler & David R. Trossen, 2009. "Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Testing a Law and Economics Approach to Standard Form Contracts," Working Papers 09-04, NET Institute, revised Aug 2009.
    3. Lucie Guibault, 2008. "Accommodating the Needs of iConsumers: Making Sure They Get Their Money’s Worth of Digital Entertainment," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 409-423, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Daly & A. Scardamaglia, 2017. "Profiling the Australian Google Consumer: Implications of Search Engine Practices for Consumer Law and Policy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 299-320, September.
    2. Norbert Reich, 2014. "Natali Helberger, Lucie Guibault, Marco Loos, Chantal Maak, Lodewijk Pessers, Bart van de Sloog: Digital Consumers and the Law—Towards a Cohesive European Framework," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 143-145, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zev J. Eigen, 2012. "When and Why Individuals Obey Contracts: Experimental Evidence of Consent, Compliance, Promise, and Performance," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(1), pages 67-93.
    2. Mitja Kovač & Ann-Sophie Vandenberghe, 2015. "Regulation of Automatic Renewal Clauses: A Behavioural Law and Economics Approach," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 287-313, September.
    3. Michael Faure & Hanneke Luth, 2011. "Behavioural Economics in Unfair Contract Terms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 337-358, September.
    4. Maen Alaraj & Makoto Nishibe, 2020. "Stimulate currency circulation in the currency community by creating a customized community," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 399-412, July.
    5. Procaccia Yuval & Harel Alon, 2012. "On the Optimal Regulation of Unread Contracts," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 59-89, April.
    6. Natali Helberger, 2008. "Making Place for the iConsumer in Consumer Law," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 385-391, December.
    7. Thomas J. Maronick, 2014. "Do Consumers Read Terms of Service Agreements When Installing Software? - A Two-Study Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(6), pages 137-145, June.
    8. Oranuch Sawetrattanasatian, 2019. "Access to Information of Disabled People on the Web: A Dispute between Accessibility and Digital Rights Management," GATR Journals gjbssr541, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    9. Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, 2012. "Does Contract Disclosure Matter?," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 168(1), pages 94-119, March.
    10. Thomas J. Maronick, 2014. "Do Consumers Read Terms of Service Agreements When Installing Software? - A Two-Study Empirical Analysis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(6), pages 137-145, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:36:y:2013:i:1:p:37-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.