IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v175y2022i4d10.1007_s10551-020-04576-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debating Ethics or Risks? An Exploratory Study of Audit Partners’ Peer Consultations About Ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Mouna Hazgui

    (HEC Montreal)

  • Marion Brivot

    (Pavillon Palasis-Prince, Université Laval)

Abstract

This qualitative field study is based on interviews with 20 experienced audit partners in France and documents the dialogical dimension of ethical deliberation in auditing. We ask: do audit partners consult each other when faced with an ethical dilemma at work? Who among their peers do they prefer to consult and why? Our analysis provides evidence that audit partners do not deliberate alone, contrary to what psychological experimental research on audit ethics usually postulates. When faced with an uncertain situation in terms of professional ethics, they seek reassurance by consulting colleagues. Not just any colleagues, however. Whom they consult depends on whether they wish to avoid or take measured ethical risks. Overall, we find that audit partners approach ethics as a personal and collective risk that must be managed in specific ways. This study enriches what we know about auditor ethics by helping to shed light on what is usually inaccessible to researchers: the questions that audit partners ask their peers when faced with uncomfortable ethical issues in client engagements before making a decision they find acceptable.

Suggested Citation

  • Mouna Hazgui & Marion Brivot, 2022. "Debating Ethics or Risks? An Exploratory Study of Audit Partners’ Peer Consultations About Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(4), pages 741-758, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:175:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-020-04576-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04576-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-020-04576-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-020-04576-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Åsa Boholm & Hervé Corvellec, 2011. "A relational theory of risk," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 175-190, February.
    2. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    3. Linsley, Philip M. & Shrives, Philip J., 2009. "Mary Douglas, risk and accounting failures," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 492-508.
    4. Géraldine Hottegindre & Marie-Claire Loison & Anne-Laure Farjaudon, 2017. "Male and Female Auditors : An Ethical Divide?," Post-Print hal-02312052, HAL.
    5. Christian Prat dit Hauret, 2003. "L'indépendance du commissaire aux comptes : une analyse empirique fondée sur trois composantes psychologiques du comportement," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 9(2), pages 31-58.
    6. Kornberger, Martin & Justesen, Lise & Mouritsen, Jan, 2011. "“When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you”: An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 Accounting Firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 514-533.
    7. Martin Kornberger & Lise Justesen & Jan Mouritsen, 2011. "“When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you” : An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 Accounting Firm," Post-Print hal-02311997, HAL.
    8. Linda Thorne & Jon Hartwick, 2001. "The Directional Effects of Discussion on Auditors' Moral Reasoning," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 337-361, June.
    9. Tommaso Palermo & Michael Power & Simon Ashby, 2017. "Navigating Institutional Complexity: The Production of Risk Culture in the Financial Sector," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 154-181, March.
    10. Breda Sweeney & Don Arnold & Bernard Pierce, 2010. "The Impact of Perceived Ethical Culture of the Firm and Demographic Variables on Auditors’ Ethical Evaluation and Intention to Act Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 531-551, June.
    11. Mar Pérezts & Sébastien Picard, 2015. "Compliance or Comfort Zone? The Work of Embedded Ethics in Performing Regulation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 833-852, November.
    12. Elaine Doyle & Jane Hughes & Keith Glaister, 2009. "Linking Ethics and Risk Management in Taxation: Evidence from an Exploratory Study in Ireland and the UK," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 177-198, May.
    13. Power, Michael, 2009. "The risk management of nothing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 849-855, August.
    14. Janet Morrill, 1996. "Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Professional Judgment and the Auditor," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 371-378, March.
    15. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Ghislaine Garmilis, 2016. "Accounting professionals' ethical judgment and the institutional disciplinary context : a French-US comparison," Post-Print hal-01404040, HAL.
    16. Mar Perezts & Sébastien Picard, 2015. "Compliance or Comfort Zone? : The Work of Embedded Ethics in Performing Regulation," Post-Print hal-02313176, HAL.
    17. Lord, Alan T. & Todd DeZoort, F., 2001. "The impact of commitment and moral reasoning on auditors' responses to social influence pressure," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 215-235, April.
    18. Samsonova-Taddei, Anna & Humphrey, Christopher, 2015. "Risk and the construction of a European audit policy agenda: The case of auditor liability," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 55-72.
    19. Trotman, Ken T. & Bauer, Tim D. & Humphreys, Kerry A., 2015. "Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Past and future research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 56-72.
    20. C. Richard Baker & Jean Bédard & Christian Prat dit Hauret, 2014. "The regulation of statutory auditing: an institutional theory approach," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 29(5), pages 371-394, May.
    21. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Ghislaine Garmilis, 2016. "Accounting professionals' ethical judgment and the institutional disciplinary context : a French-US comparison," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01404040, HAL.
    22. Ashby, Simon & Palermo, Tommaso & Power, Michael, 2012. "Risk culture in financial organisations: an interim report," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 47488, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    23. Christopher Humphrey & Asad Kausar & Anne Loft & Margaret Woods, 2011. "Regulating Audit beyond the Crisis: A Critical Discussion of the EU Green Paper," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 431-457, June.
    24. Thorne, Linda & Massey, Dawn W. & Jones, Joanne, 2004. "An Investigation of Social Influence: Explaining the Effect of Group Discussion on Consensus in Auditors’ Ethical Reasoning," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 525-551, July.
    25. Ashby, Simon & Power, Michael & Palermo, Tommaso, 2014. "A brave new world? Making sense of practitioner and regulator perspectives on risk culture," Journal of Financial Perspectives, EY Global FS Institute, vol. 2(3), pages 65-76.
    26. Christian Prat dit Hauret & François Durrieu, 2005. "La culture organisationnelle des cabinets d'expertise comptable perçue par les experts-comptables stagiaires : échelle de mesure et analyse empirique," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 11(1), pages 39-54.
    27. Christian Prat dit Hauret & François Durrieu, 2005. "La culture organisationnelle des cabinets d'expertise comptable perçue par les experts-comptables stagiaires : échelle de mesure et analyse empirique," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 11(1), pages 39-54.
    28. Kennedy, J & Kleinmuntz, DN & Peecher, ME, 1997. "Determinants of the justifiability of performance in ill-structured audit tasks," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35, pages 105-123.
    29. Martin Kornberger & Lise Justesen & Jan Mouritsen, 2011. "“When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you” : An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 Accounting Firm," Post-Print hal-02276736, HAL.
    30. W. Robert Knechel & Justin Leiby, 2016. "If You Want My Advice: Status Motives and Audit Consultations About Accounting Estimates," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 1331-1364, December.
    31. Jeff Everett & Constance Friesen & Dean Neu & Abu Shiraz Rahaman, 2018. "We Have Never Been Secular: Religious Identities, Duties, and Ethics in Audit Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1121-1142, December.
    32. Gibbins, M, 1984. "Propositions About The Psychology Of Professional Judgment In Public Accounting," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 103-125.
    33. Géraldine Hottegindre & Loïc Belze, 2013. "Le H3C, état des lieux du volet disciplinaire," Post-Print hal-02312985, HAL.
    34. Alain Mikol, 1993. "The evolution of auditing and the independent auditor in France," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-16.
    35. Gendron, Yves & Spira, Laura F., 2010. "Identity narratives under threat: A study of former members of Arthur Andersen," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 275-300, April.
    36. Power, Michael K., 2003. "Auditing and the production of legitimacy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 379-394, May.
    37. Christian Prat dit Hauret, 2003. "L'indépendance du commissaire aux comptes : une analyse empirique fondée sur trois composantes psychologiques du comportement," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 9(2), pages 31-58.
    38. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Ghislaine Garmilis, 2016. "Accounting Professionals’ Ethical Judgment and the Institutional Disciplinary Context: A French–US Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 639-659, December.
    39. Olivier Herrbach, 2005. "The art of Compromise ? The individual and organisational legitimacy of "irregular auditing"," Post-Print halshs-00005479, HAL.
    40. Anna Samsonova-Taddei & Javed Siddiqui, 2016. "Regulation and the Promotion of Audit Ethics: Analysis of the Content of the EU’s Policy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 183-195, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mayer, Maryse & Gendron, Yves, 2024. "“Fly alone, die alone”? The clan and the production of tax expertise," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    2. Marion Brivot & Mélanie Roussy & Yves Gendron, 2024. "The Riskification of Internal Auditors’ Ethical Deliberation: An Emerging Third Logic Between Norms and Values?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 691-712, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dermarkar, Simon & Hazgui, Mouna, 2022. "How auditors legitimize commercialism: A micro-discursive analysis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Beau, Pauline & Jerman, Lambert, 2022. "Bonding forged in “auditing hell”: The emotional qualities of Big Four auditors," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Guénin-Paracini, Henri & Malsch, Bertrand & Paillé, Anne Marché, 2014. "Fear and risk in the audit process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 264-288.
    4. Christelle Chaplais, 2018. "Révélation de faits délictueux et formation à l'éthique : perception des auditeurs," Post-Print hal-01907886, HAL.
    5. Lambert Jerman & Alaric Bourgoin, 2016. "L'identité négative de l'auditeur," Post-Print hal-01902594, HAL.
    6. Laetitia Legalais, 2015. "L'Influence D'Un Blocage De Carriere Sur La Construction De L'Identite Professionnelle : Le Cas Des Contrôleurs De Gestion," Post-Print hal-01188764, HAL.
    7. Claire Garnier, 2018. "L'associé est-il un auditeur comme les autres ? La construction de l'identité de l'associé dans les cabinets Big 4 en France," Post-Print hal-01907933, HAL.
    8. Guo, Ken H., 2018. "The odyssey of becoming: Professional identity and insecurity in the Canadian accounting field," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 20-45.
    9. de Vries, Marlies & Blomme, Rob & De Loo, Ivo, 2022. "Part of the herd or black sheep? An exploration of trainee accountants’ suffering and modes of adaptation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Haynes, Kathryn, 2017. "Accounting as gendering and gendered: A review of 25 years of critical accounting research on gender," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 110-124.
    11. Olivier Boiral & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria & Marie-Christine Brotherton & Julie Bernard, 2019. "Ethical Issues in the Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Perspectives from Assurance Providers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1111-1125, November.
    12. Lambert Jerman & Pauline Beau & Claire Garnier, 2016. "Le « dividual professional »," Post-Print hal-01902409, HAL.
    13. Renu Desai & Robin Roberts, 2013. "Deficiencies in the Code of Conduct: The AICPA Rhetoric Surrounding the Tax Return Preparation Outsourcing Disclosure Rules," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 457-471, May.
    14. Durocher, Sylvain & Bujaki, Merridee & Brouard, François, 2016. "Attracting Millennials: Legitimacy management and bottom-up socialization processes within accounting firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-24.
    15. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:166-178 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Manuel Orta-Pérez & M. Ángeles Rodríguez-Serrano, 2020. "The Benefits of Auditors’ Sustained Ethical Behavior: Increased Trust and Reduced Costs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 441-459, October.
    17. Downar, Benedikt & Ernstberger, Jürgen & Koch, Christopher, 2021. "Who makes partner in Big 4 audit firms? – Evidence from Germany," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Anderson-Gough, Fiona & Edgley, Carla & Robson, Keith & Sharma, Nina, 2022. "Organizational responses to multiple logics: Diversity, identity and the professional service firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Claire France Picard & Sylvain Durocher & Yves Gendron, 2013. "From Meticulous Professionals To Superheroes Of The Business World: A Historical Portrait Of A Cultural Change In The Field Of Accountancy," Post-Print hal-00993019, HAL.
    20. Dierynck, Bart & Kadous, Kathryn & Peters, Christian P. H., 2024. "Learning in the auditing profession: A framework and future directions," Other publications TiSEM eb74c8e4-bc4a-4b71-b88a-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    21. Covaleski, Mark A. & Earley, Christine E. & Zehms, Karla M., 2021. "The lived reality of public accounting interns," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:175:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-020-04576-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.