IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/copoec/v31y2020i2d10.1007_s10602-019-09299-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generality and knowledge: Hayek's constitutional theory of the liberal state

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher S. Martin

    (Hillsdale College)

  • Nikolai G. Wenzel

    (Fayetteville State University)

Abstract

This paper examines Hayek's constitutional theory of the liberal state. Hayek argued powerfully that no central planner has sufficient knowledge to run an economy, and that no one has sufficient knowledge to determine ends for others. Pushed to their logical conclusion, these arguments would seem to prescribe the smallest possible state in both scope and size, or perhaps even no state at all. Elsewhere in his writings, however, Hayek explicitly endorsed government activity that goes far beyond a “night watchman” state (to include public works such as infrastructure, roads and bridge, as well as social insurance, conscription, a minimum safety net, and even countercyclical investment)—as long as state action was carefully constrained by a generality principle. After thoroughly setting forth Hayek's worries about knowledge and his proposals for acceptable station action, the paper synthesizes the two into a Hayekian constitutional theory of the liberal state, then closes with a brief discussion of some tensions in Hayek's work.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher S. Martin & Nikolai G. Wenzel, 2020. "Generality and knowledge: Hayek's constitutional theory of the liberal state," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 145-168, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:copoec:v:31:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10602-019-09299-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10602-019-09299-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10602-019-09299-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10602-019-09299-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buchanan,James M. & Congleton,Roger D., 2006. "Politics by Principle, Not Interest," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521031325, October.
    2. Hayek, F. A. & Caldwell, Bruce, 2007. "The Road to Serfdom," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226320557 edited by Caldwell, Bruce.
    3. Hayek, F. A. & Caldwell, Bruce, 2007. "The Road to Serfdom," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226320540 edited by Caldwell, Bruce, Febrero.
    4. Roger Congleton, 2007. "On the Feasibility of a Liberal Welfare State: Agency and Exit Costs in Income Security Clubs," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 145-159, September.
    5. Stringham, Edward Peter, 2015. "Private Governance: Creating Order in Economic and Social Life," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199365166.
    6. Christopher S. Martin & Nikolai G. Wenzel, 2018. "Misjudging the character of the welfare state: Hayek, generality, and the knowledge problem," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 301-314, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roger D. Congleton, 2020. "Governance by true believers: supreme duties with and without totalitarianism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 111-141, March.
    2. Åsbjørn Melkevik, 2016. "No progressive taxation without discrimination? On the generality of the law in the classical liberal tradition," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 418-434, December.
    3. Feld, Lars P. & Nientiedt, Daniel, 2022. "Hayekian economic policy," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 457-465.
    4. Jean-Paul Azam & Elodie Djemai, 2019. "Matching, Cooperation and HIV in the Couple," Working Papers DT/2019/02, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    5. Michael Makovi, 2015. "George Orwell as a Public Choice Economist," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(2), pages 183-208, September.
    6. Kevin Vallier, 2017. "Gaus, Hayek, and the place of civil religion in a free society," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 327-352, September.
    7. Niclas Berggren, 2009. "Choosing one’s own informal institutions: on Hayek’s critique of Keynes’s immoralism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 139-159, June.
    8. Richard M. Ebeling, 2020. "The Geneva connection, a liberal world order, and the Austrian economists," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 535-554, December.
    9. Stefan Kolev & Nils Goldschmidt & Jan-Otmar Hesse, 2020. "Debating liberalism: Walter Eucken, F. A. Hayek and the early history of the Mont Pèlerin Society," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 433-463, December.
    10. Hildebrandt, Mireille, 2020. "Smart technologies," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16.
    11. Christopher S. Martin & Nikolai G. Wenzel, 2018. "Misjudging the character of the welfare state: Hayek, generality, and the knowledge problem," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(3), pages 301-314, September.
    12. Alexander William Salter, 2016. "Political Property Rights and Governance Outcomes: A Theory of the Corporate Polity," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 31(Winter 20), pages 1-20.
    13. Ravenscroft, Sue & Williams, Paul F., 2021. "Sustaining discreditable accounting research through ignorance: The mainstream elite’s response to the 2008 financial crisis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    14. Palagashvili,Liya & Piano,Ennio & Skarbek,David, 2017. "The Decline and Rise of Institutions," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781316649176, October.
    15. David Mitch, 2016. "A Year of Transition: Faculty Recruiting at Chicago in 1946," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(6), pages 1714-1734.
    16. Risse, Mathias & Meyer, Marco, 2018. "The Globalized Myth of Ownership and Its Implications for Tax Competition," Working Paper Series rwp18-018, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    17. Williams, Paul F., 2017. "Jumping on the wrong bus: Reflections on a long, strange journey," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 76-85.
    18. Boeing, Geoff, 2017. "Methods and Measures for Analyzing Complex Street Networks and Urban Form," SocArXiv 93h82, Center for Open Science.
    19. Makovi, Michael, 2015. "Two Opposing Economic-Literary Critiques of Socialism: George Orwell Versus Eugen Richter and Henry Hazlitt," MPRA Paper 62528, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Daniel Nientiedt, 2021. "Hayek’s treatment of legal positivism," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 563-576, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hayek; Constitutional theory; Liberal state; Generality; Knowledge problem;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • P51 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Analysis of Economic Systems

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:copoec:v:31:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10602-019-09299-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.