IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v21y2003i1p153-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational Tools for the Analysis of Market Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Suárez
  • Santiago Carrillo

Abstract

The estimation and management of risk is an important and complex task faced by market regulators and financial institutions. Accurate and reliable quantitative measures of risk are needed to minimize undesirable effects on a given portfolio fromlarge fluctuations in market conditions. To accomplish this, a series of computational tools has beendesigned, implemented, and incorporated into MatRisk, an integratedenvironment for risk assessment developed in MATLAB. Besides standard measures, such as Value at Risk(VaR), the application includes other more sophisticated risk measures that address the inability of VaRproperly to characterize the structure of risk. Conditionalrisk measures can also be estimated for autoregressive models with heteroskedasticity, including some novel mixture models. These tools are illustrated with a comprehensive risk analysis of the Spanish IBEX35 stock index. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Suárez & Santiago Carrillo, 2003. "Computational Tools for the Analysis of Market Risk," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 153-172, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:21:y:2003:i:1:p:153-172
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1022267720606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1022267720606
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1022267720606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    2. C. S. Wong & W. K. Li, 2000. "On a mixture autoregressive model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 62(1), pages 95-115.
    3. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    4. Robert Jarrow, 2017. "Derivatives," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF RISK MANAGEMENT Theory, Practice, and Applications, chapter 3, pages 19-28, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Hamilton, James D, 1991. "A Quasi-Bayesian Approach to Estimating Parameters for Mixtures of Normal Distributions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 9(1), pages 27-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Suarez & Santiago Carrillo, 2000. "Computational Tools For The Analysis Of Market Risk," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 144, Society for Computational Economics.
    2. Ra l De Jes s Guti rrez & Lidia E. Carvajal Guti rrez & Oswaldo Garcia Salgado, 2023. "Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Estimation for Mexico s Isthmus Crude Oil Using Long-Memory GARCH-EVT Combined Approaches," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 467-480, July.
    3. Dimitriadis, Timo & Schnaitmann, Julie, 2021. "Forecast encompassing tests for the expected shortfall," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 604-621.
    4. Chao Wang & Richard Gerlach, 2021. "A Bayesian realized threshold measurement GARCH framework for financial tail risk forecasting," Papers 2106.00288, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    5. E. Ramos-P'erez & P. J. Alonso-Gonz'alez & J. J. N'u~nez-Vel'azquez, 2020. "Forecasting volatility with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network," Papers 2006.16383, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    6. Mai Jan-Frederik & Schenk Steffen & Scherer Matthias, 2015. "Analyzing model robustness via a distortion of the stochastic root: A Dirichlet prior approach," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 32(3-4), pages 177-195, December.
    7. Vladimir Rankovic & Mikica Drenovak & Branko Uroševic & Ranko Jelic, 2016. "Mean Univariate-GARCH VaR Portfolio Optimization: Actual Portfolio Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 5731, CESifo.
    8. da Costa, B. Freitas Paulo & Pesenti, Silvana M. & Targino, Rodrigo S., 2023. "Risk budgeting portfolios from simulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1040-1056.
    9. Mohamed El Ghourabi & Christian Francq & Fedya Telmoudi, 2016. "Consistent Estimation of the Value at Risk When the Error Distribution of the Volatility Model is Misspecified," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 46-76, January.
    10. Santos, Douglas G. & Candido, Osvaldo & Tófoli, Paula V., 2022. "Forecasting risk measures using intraday and overnight information," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Makushkin, Mikhail & Lapshin, Victor, 2023. "Dynamic Nelson–Siegel model for market risk estimation of bonds: Practical implementation," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 69, pages 5-27.
    12. Yacine AÏT‐SAHALI & Michael W. Brandt, 2001. "Variable Selection for Portfolio Choice," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1297-1351, August.
    13. L. Bauwens & J.V.K. Rombouts, 2007. "Bayesian inference for the mixed conditional heteroskedasticity model," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 10(2), pages 408-425, July.
    14. Chen, Cathy W.S. & Hsu, Hsiao-Yun & Watanabe, Toshiaki, 2023. "Tail risk forecasting of realized volatility CAViaR models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    15. Shige Peng & Shuzhen Yang, 2020. "Distributional uncertainty of the financial time series measured by G-expectation," Papers 2011.09226, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    16. Kavussanos, Manolis G. & Dimitrakopoulos, Dimitris N., 2011. "Market risk model selection and medium-term risk with limited data: Application to ocean tanker freight markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 258-268.
    17. Hoogerheide, Lennart & van Dijk, Herman K., 2010. "Bayesian forecasting of Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall using adaptive importance sampling," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 231-247, April.
    18. Lakshina, Valeriya, 2020. "Do portfolio investors need to consider the asymmetry of returns on the Russian stock market?," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    19. Hoga, Yannick, 2021. "The uncertainty in extreme risk forecasts from covariate-augmented volatility models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 675-686.
    20. Stavroyiannis, S. & Makris, I. & Nikolaidis, V. & Zarangas, L., 2012. "Econometric modeling and value-at-risk using the Pearson type-IV distribution," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 10-17.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:21:y:2003:i:1:p:153-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.