Assessing scientific literacy skill perceptions and practical capabilities in fourth year undergraduate biological science students
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Megan Yu & Yu-Min Kuo, 2017. "Ten simple rules to make the most out of your undergraduate research career," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-7, May.
- Jennifer M Monk & Genevieve Newton, 2018. "Use of a Scaffolded Case Study Assignment to Enhance Students’ Scientific Literacy Skills in Undergraduate Nutritional Science Education: Comparison between Traditional Lecture and Distance Educatio," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 1-95, April.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Cameron Mura & Mike Chalupa & Abigail M Newbury & Jack Chalupa & Philip E Bourne, 2020. "Ten simple rules for starting research in your late teens," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-11, November.
- Emily A Lescak & Kate M O’Neill & Giovanna M Collu & Subhamoy Das, 2019. "Ten simple rules for providing a meaningful research experience to high school students," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-7, April.
- Diego A Forero & Sandra Lopez-Leon & George P Patrinos, 2017. "Ten simple rules for international short-term research stays," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-5, December.
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:9:y:2020:i:6:p:64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.