IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v4y2015i2p214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tacit Knowledge Sharing Modes of University Teachers From the Perspectives of Psychological Risk and Value

Author

Listed:
  • Dengke Yu
  • Rong Zhou

Abstract

Tacit knowledge sharing is important to improve the teaching skill and researching knowledge of university teachers. In this paper, the tacit knowledge sharing of university teachers is catalogued as four modes from perspectives of the psychological risk and psychological value which are measured by two grades – high and low. The four modes are named “Peer-review†, “Learning Community†, “Thumb-a-lift†and “Academic Conference†, which are characterized by different values and risks. Some suggestions are proposed to promote the tacit knowledge sharing of university teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dengke Yu & Rong Zhou, 2015. "Tacit Knowledge Sharing Modes of University Teachers From the Perspectives of Psychological Risk and Value," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(2), pages 214-214, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/6834/4170
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/6834
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. P. Sharma & M. D. Singh, 2015. "Modeling the Knowledge Sharing Barriers: An ISM Approach," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 16-33, January.
    2. Enno Siemsen & Aleda V. Roth & Sridhar Balasubramanian & Gopesh Anand, 2009. "The Influence of Psychological Safety and Confidence in Knowledge on Employee Knowledge Sharing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 429-447, April.
    3. Mingkui Huo, 2013. "Analysis of Knowledge-sharing Evolutionary Game in University Teacher Team," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-60, February.
    4. Prescott C. Ensign, 2009. "Knowledge Sharing among Scientists," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-61713-1, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Danijela Pongrac & Mihaela Banek Zorica & Roman Domović, 2022. "Scholars’ Domain of Information Space," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guiyang Zhang, 2021. "Employee co-invention network dynamics and firm exploratory innovation: the moderation of employee co-invention network centralization and knowledge-employee network equilibrium," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7811-7836, September.
    2. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2011. "Fluid Tasks and Fluid Teams: The Impact of Diversity in Experience and Team Familiarity on Team Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 310-328, July.
    3. Katherine Bobroske & Michael Freeman & Lawrence Huan & Anita Cattrell & Stefan Scholtes, 2022. "Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at Its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance After Opioid Initiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2003-2015, March.
    4. Liu, Yuwen & Phillips, James S., 2011. "Examining the antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitating team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 44-52.
    5. Tilko Swalve, 2022. "Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 223-249, March.
    6. Karen Donohue & Özalp Özer, 2020. "Behavioral Operations: Past, Present, and Future," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 191-202, January.
    7. Andrea Furlan & Ambra Galeazzo & Adriano Paggiaro, 2019. "Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees’ Problem Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 280-297, March.
    8. Yong Ming Wang & Waqar Ahmad & Muhammad Arshad & Hong Li Yin & Bilal Ahmed & Zulfiqar Ali, 2021. "Impact of Coordination, Psychological Safety, and Job Security on Employees’ Performance: The Moderating Role of Coercive Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Wayne H. Stewart Jr. & Ruth C. May & Donna E. Ledgerwood, 2015. "Do You Know What I Know? Intent to Share Knowledge in the US and Ukraine," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 737-773, December.
    10. Julio C. Acosta-Prado & Oscar H. López-Montoya & Carlos Sanchís-Pedregosa & Ulpiano J. Vázquez-Martínez, 2020. "Sustainable Orientation of Management Capability and Innovative Performance: The Mediating Effect of Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Ting Nie & Mi Tian & Hengrui Liang, 2021. "Relational Capital and Post-Traumatic Growth: The Role of Work Meaning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-11, July.
    12. Lu Wang & Lorna Doucet & Mary Waller & Karin Sanders & Sybil Phillips, 2016. "A Laughing Matter: Patterns of Laughter and the Effectiveness of Working Dyads," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1142-1160, October.
    13. Sasmita Palo & Linu Charles, 2015. "Investigating Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Intention of Salespeople," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 40(3-4), pages 302-324, August.
    14. Wing Shing Lee, 2020. "An Experimental Investigation Into the Application of a Learning-From-Mistakes Approach Among Freshmen Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.
    15. Coun, Martine J.H. & Peters, Pascale & Blomme, Rob J., 2019. "‘Let's share!’ The mediating role of employees' self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 481-491.
    16. Yuan Chen & Hsing Kenneth Cheng & Yang Liu & Jingchuan Pu & Liangfei Qiu & Ning Wang, 2022. "Knowledge‐sharing ties and equivalence in corporate online communities: A novel source to understand voluntary turnover," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3896-3913, October.
    17. Melissa A. Valentine & Tom Fangyun Tan & Bradley R. Staats & Amy C. Edmondson, 2019. "Fluid Teams and Knowledge Retrieval: Scaling Service Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 346-360, May.
    18. Jawad Karamat & Tong Shurong & Naveed Ahmad & Sana Afridi & Shahbaz Khan & Nidha Khan, 2019. "Developing Sustainable Healthcare Systems in Developing Countries: Examining the Role of Barriers, Enablers and Drivers on Knowledge Management Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-31, February.
    19. Jian Peng & Zhen Wang & Xiao Chen, 2019. "Does Self-Serving Leadership Hinder Team Creativity? A Moderated Dual-Path Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(2), pages 419-433, October.
    20. Staneiu Roxana-Maria, 2022. "Psychological Safety as a catalyst for Knowledge Sharing," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 98-108, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.