IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v11y2022i7p79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sense of Community: Perceptions of “Inter-Intra†Collaborations in an Academic Environment through the Lenses of Botho Principles and the Field of industrial Psychology

Author

Listed:
  • Dineo Diale

Abstract

In the current study, I explored the concept of collaboration from Botho principles and the industrial psychology perspective in the specific higher learning institution. Using a qualitative approach, 13 participants performing academic and nonacademic roles formed part of the study. Overall, the participants experience regarding collaboration in an academic environment are reported to be in the form of shared goals, sense of unity, diversity, and solution-driven teams. Further participants experience in relation to collaboration is African culture [Botho principles]. The latter were perceived   contributors to collaboration within departments (intra); and few barriers to collaboration were discovered, such as criteria, lack of shared leadership, lack of collaboration champions or ambassadors. The concept of Botho is defined as a social contract of mutual respect, humanity, and responsibility that members have with one another often referred to as bringing in humanity onto a set environment. Although there are commonalities between Botho and Ubuntu, they however have dissimilarities and are underpinned by different cultures and traditions. Ubuntu is seen often used by a slogan, “I am because you are†. Botho is Setswana or Sesotho concept while Ubuntu forms part of Nguni languages.  I then further conceptualize collaboration through the lens of industrial psychology from the results and offer future research recommendations in the current paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Dineo Diale, 2022. "Sense of Community: Perceptions of “Inter-Intra†Collaborations in an Academic Environment through the Lenses of Botho Principles and the Field of industrial Psychology," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(7), pages 1-79, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/21745/13462
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/21745
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ora-orn Poocharoen & Bernard Ting, 2015. "Collaboration, Co-Production, Networks: Convergence of theories," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 587-614, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldona Fraczkiewicz-Wronka & Anna Kozak, 2021. "Facilitating Co-production in Health Promotion: Study of Senior Councils in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 182-201.
    2. Kaya, Bahar & Abubakar, A. Mohammed & Behravesh, Elaheh & Yildiz, Harun & Mert, Ibrahim Sani, 2020. "Antecedents of innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 278-289.
    3. Maura Campra & Silvana Secinaro & Valerio Brescia, 2021. "Network among Institutions: The Case of TORINO Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(4), pages 116-116, July.
    4. Thekiso MOLOKWANE & Alex NDUHURA & Lukamba Muhiya-TSHOMBE & Innocent NUWAGABA, 2020. "The role of PPPs in creating sustainable cities," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 8, pages 283-302, November.
    5. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).
    6. Noémie Dominguez & Patricia Loncle & Emanuelle Maunaye & Eunice Cascant & Catherine Mercier-Suissa & Emily Mugel & Maité Pinchon & Nancy Ottaviano, 2021. "Overview of Refugees’ access to housing in France: the metropoles of Lyon and Rennes," Working Papers halshs-03448067, HAL.
    7. Pettersson, Fredrik & Westerdahl, Stig & Hansson, Joel, 2018. "Learning through collaboration in the Swedish public transport sector? Co-production through guidelines and living labs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 394-401.
    8. Giliberto Capano & Anna Malandrino, 2022. "Mapping the use of knowledge in policymaking: barriers and facilitators from a subjectivist perspective (1990–2020)," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 399-428, September.
    9. Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Cristina Campanale & Sara Giovanna Mauro & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Managing co-production and enhancing good governance principles: insights from two case studies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 275-306, March.
    11. Frederike Marie Oschinsky & Hans Christian Klein & Bjoern Niehaves, 2022. "Invite everyone to the table, but not to every course," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1925-1941, December.
    12. Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech, 2018. "How Practices of Managing Partnerships Contributes to the Value Creation—Public–Social Partnership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.