IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijfr11/v8y2017i3p105-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Company Size Effect in the Stock Market of Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Gerardo ¡°Gerry¡± Alfonso Perez

Abstract

The outperformance of small capitalization companies over large capitalization companies is a well-known occurrence in developed markets (Gorn, 1962), (Jacobs, 1989) with (Banz, 1981) numerically showing that this effect on stocks in the New York Stock Exchange. This phenomenon is based on the idea that some company specific characteristics can have a statistically significant impact on stock performance. The existence, or otherwise of this effect in emerging markets has received less attention. Given the very different characteristics of emerging markets compared to mature markets like the US is not immediately evident that the same conclusions can be extrapolated. One of the immediate clear differences between emerging and mature markets is the depth with markets like the US having a large amount of listed companies as well as large average trading volumes. In fact, when this analysis has been repeated in some emerging markets, such as Sri Lanka, the results seem to indicate that there is no statistically appreciable difference between the return of small and large capitalization stocks (Macn, 2013). It should be noted that in the case of the Sri Lanka case there were only, at the time of the article, 25 listed companies, of which only 12 were included in the analysis. The specific case of the stock market of Thailand is analyzed in this paper. The results of this article seem to point towards the existence of a size effect, affecting stock performance, in the Thai stock market. Some articles covering emerging market as a whole as pointed towards the opposite results. Given the substantial differences among emerging markets countries it is perhaps a better approach to follow an individualized analysis, country per country, rather than treat it as a homogenous group.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerardo ¡°Gerry¡± Alfonso Perez, 2017. "Company Size Effect in the Stock Market of Thailand," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(3), pages 105-110, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:105-110
    DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v8n3p105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/11837/7285
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/11837
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5430/ijfr.v8n3p105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schwert, G. William, 1983. "Size and stock returns, and other empirical regularities," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 3-12, June.
    2. Kewei Hou & G. Andrew Karolyi & Bong-Chan Kho, 2011. "What Factors Drive Global Stock Returns?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(8), pages 2527-2574.
    3. Burton G. Malkiel, 2003. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 59-82, Winter.
    4. Banz, Rolf W., 1981. "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-18, March.
    5. Burton G. Malkiel, 2003. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics," Working Papers 111, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    6. K. Geert Rouwenhorst, 1999. "Local Return Factors and Turnover in Emerging Stock Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1439-1464, August.
    7. Burton G. Malkiel, 2003. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics," Working Papers 111, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..
    8. repec:pri:cepsud:91malkiel is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Cheung, Yan-Leung & Leung, Yiu-Ming & Wong, Kwok-Fai, 1994. "Small Firm Effect: Evidence from Korean Stock Exchange," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 6(5), pages 373-379, October.
    10. Ogden, Joseph P, 1990. "Turn-of-Month Evaluations of Liquid Profits and Stock Returns: A Common Explanation for the Monthly and January Effects," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 45(4), pages 1259-1272, September.
    11. Stephen H. Penman & Scott A. Richardson & İrem Tuna, 2007. "The Book‐to‐Price Effect in Stock Returns: Accounting for Leverage," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 427-467, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gerardo “Gerry” Alfonso Perez, 2017. "Value Investing in the Stock Market of Thailand," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Zaremba & Jacob Koby Shemer, 2018. "Price-Based Investment Strategies," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-91530-2, January.
    2. Eero Pätäri & Timo Leivo, 2017. "A Closer Look At Value Premium: Literature Review And Synthesis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 79-168, February.
    3. Tienyu Hwang & Simon Gao & Heather Owen, 2014. "Markowitz efficiency and size effect: evidence from the UK stock market," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 721-750, November.
    4. Paul Handro & Bogdan Dima, 2024. "Analyzing Financial Markets Efficiency: Insights from a Bibliometric and Content Review," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 16(9), pages 119-175, May.
    5. Nageri Kamaldeen Ibraheem & Abdulkadir Rihanat Idowu, 2019. "Is the Nigerian Stock Market Efficient? Pre and Post 2007-2009 Meltdown Analysis," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 38-63, September.
    6. Qianwei Ying & Tahir Yousaf & Qurat ul Ain & Yasmeen Akhtar & Muhammad Shahid Rasheed, 2019. "Stock Investment and Excess Returns: A Critical Review in the Light of the Efficient Market Hypothesis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Jenni L Bettman & Wen Sern Kelvin Ng & Stephen J Sault, 2011. "The economic significance of trading based on the size effect in Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 36(1), pages 59-73, April.
    8. T.G. Saji, 2018. "Predicting Market Betas," Paradigm, , vol. 22(2), pages 160-174, December.
    9. Tobek, Ondrej & Hronec, Martin, 2021. "Does it pay to follow anomalies research? Machine learning approach with international evidence," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    10. Ashok Chanabasangouda Patil & Shailesh Rastogi, 2019. "Time-Varying Price–Volume Relationship and Adaptive Market Efficiency: A Survey of the Empirical Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Mikio Ito & Akihiko Noda & Tatsuma Wada, 2016. "The evolution of stock market efficiency in the US: a non-Bayesian time-varying model approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(7), pages 621-635, February.
    12. Daouda Lawa Tan Toe & Mamadou Toe & Tibi Didier Zoungrana, 2023. "Investigating the weak and semi-strong forms of Informational Efficiency on the West African Economic and Monetary Union’s Stock Exchange (BRVM) through returns predictability tests," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(9), pages 1-27, September.
    13. Supriya Maheshwari & Raj S. Dhankar, 2017. "Profitability of Volume-based Momentum and Contrarian Strategies in the Indian Stock Market," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(4), pages 974-992, August.
    14. Cristi Spulbar & Zulfiqar Ali Imran & Ramona Birau, 2019. "Analyzing Short Term Momentum Effect on Stock Market of Hong Kong. An Empirical Case Study," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 889-894, December.
    15. Teplova, Tamara & Mikova, Evgeniya & Nazarov, Nikolai, 2017. "Stop losses momentum strategy: From profit maximization to risk control under White’s Bootstrap Reality Check," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 240-258.
    16. Yin, Libo & Liao, Huiyi, 2021. "Big is brilliant: Understanding the Chinese size effect through profitability shocks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. González-Sánchez, Mariano, 2022. "Factorial asset pricing models using statistical anomalies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Michael Heinrich Baumann, 2022. "Beating the market? A mathematical puzzle for market efficiency," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 45(1), pages 279-325, June.
    19. Senarathne Chamil W. & Long Wei, 2019. "Industry Competition and Common Stock Returns," Management Sciences. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, Sciendo, vol. 24(3), pages 24-35, September.
    20. Zakamulin, Valeriy, 2013. "Forecasting the size premium over different time horizons," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1061-1072.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:105-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gina Perry (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijfr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.