IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v4y2015i4p26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modern Tools to Evaluate the Performance of Business Organizations between Theory and Practice-The Case of Public Cement Companies in Algeria

Author

Listed:
  • Murad Kouachi
  • Talal Al-Kassar

Abstract

Through this research, we reviewed the most important modern tools currently known at the global level in the field of management control. We found that most of them tried to bypass the traditional view in the evaluation, which was confined to the financial dimension. By proposing modern philosophies seeking to be knowledgeable in all dimensions and aspects of the organization performance. Whether, are these economic, social or environmental, etc.. According to the analysis of the survey, the result became clear to us that most of public cement company's tools and traditional methods used in the field of management control is the absence of most basic accounting information systems and of analytical accounting. As we found out through the analysis of the results of the questionnaire that the vast majority of the respondents are not familiar with the evolution of what is happening in the field of management and governance in general, and in the modern tools of management control in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Murad Kouachi & Talal Al-Kassar, 2015. "Modern Tools to Evaluate the Performance of Business Organizations between Theory and Practice-The Case of Public Cement Companies in Algeria," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/7973/5197
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/7973
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renée Adams & Daniel Ferreira, 2010. "Moderation in Groups: Evidence from Betting on Ice Break-ups in Alaska," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 77(3), pages 882-913.
    2. Hermalin, Benjamin E & Weisbach, Michael S, 1998. "Endogenously Chosen Boards of Directors and Their Monitoring of the CEO," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(1), pages 96-118, March.
    3. Renée B. Adams & Heitor Almeida & Daniel Ferreira, 2005. "Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1403-1432.
    4. Ivashina, Victoria & Scharfstein, David, 2010. "Bank lending during the financial crisis of 2008," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 319-338, September.
    5. Raymond Fisman, 2001. "Estimating the Value of Political Connections," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 1095-1102, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwangjoo Koo, 2015. "The Effects of CEO Power on Firm Value: Evidence from the Financial Crisis of 2008," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Berger, Allen N. & Kick, Thomas & Schaeck, Klaus, 2014. "Executive board composition and bank risk taking," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 48-65.
    3. Nakano, Makoto & Nguyen, Pascal, 2012. "Board size and corporate risk-taking: Further evidence from Japan," MPRA Paper 38990, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Huang, Ying Sophie & Wang, Chia-Jane, 2015. "Corporate governance and risk-taking of Chinese firms: The role of board size," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 96-113.
    5. Shabir, Mohsin & Jiang, Ping & Shahab, Yasir & Wang, Peng, 2023. "Geopolitical, economic uncertainty and bank risk: Do CEO power and board strength matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Cédric van Appelghem & Pascal Nguyen, 2020. "Do CEO-Board ties affect the firm's cost of equity? [La proximité entre le dirigeant et les administrateurs a-t-elle un impact sur le coût des fonds propres ?]," Working Papers hal-02880367, HAL.
    7. Kirsten Tangaa Nielsen & Felix von Meyerinck, 2018. "Managerial Networks and Shareholder Value: Evidence from Sudden Deaths," Working Papers on Finance 1821, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    8. Taruntej Singh Arora, 2020. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Credit Ratings: An Empirical Study in the Indian Context," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 13(2), pages 140-164, December.
    9. Yener Altunbaş & John Thornton & Yurtsev Uymaz, 2021. "Money laundering and bank risk: Evidence from U.S. banks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 4879-4894, October.
    10. Olivier De Jonghe & Mustafa Disli & Koen Schoors, 2012. "Corporate Governance, Opaque Bank Activities, and Risk/Return Efficiency: Pre- and Post-Crisis Evidence from Turkey," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 41(1), pages 51-80, April.
    11. Friedman, Henry L., 2014. "Implications of power: When the CEO can pressure the CFO to bias reports," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 117-141.
    12. Renee B. Adams & Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2010. "The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 58-107, March.
    13. Baghdadi, Ghasan A. & Nguyen, Lily H.G. & Podolski, Edward J., 2020. "Board co-option and default risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. Shi, Haina & Xu, Haoping & Zhang, Xin, 2018. "Do politically connected independent directors create or destroy value?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 82-96.
    15. Aman, Hiroyuki & Nguyen, Pascal, 2013. "Does good governance matter to debtholders? Evidence from the credit ratings of Japanese firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 14-34.
    16. Lee, Wei-Ming, 2020. "The determinants and effects of board committees," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. James, Hui Liang & Borah, Nilakshi & Lirely, Roger, 2022. "The effectiveness of board independence in high-discretion firms," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 103-117.
    18. Fich, Eliezer M. & Starks, Laura T. & Yore, Adam S., 2014. "CEO deal-making activities and compensation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 471-492.
    19. Drobetz, Wolfgang & von Meyerinck, Felix & Oesch, David & Schmid, Markus, 2014. "Board Industry Experience, Firm Value, and Investment Behavior," Working Papers on Finance 1401, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance, revised Dec 2015.
    20. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2012_017 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Garlappi, Lorenzo & Giammarino, Ron & Lazrak, Ali, 2017. "Ambiguity and the corporation: Group disagreement and underinvestment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 417-433.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:4:y:2015:i:4:p:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.