IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v3y2014i3p117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board Subcommittees: If Not, Why Not?

Author

Listed:
  • Tek Lama

Abstract

This study examines factors that may influence a company’s decision to comply or (depart) from certain ASX recommended governance of best practice under the ASXCGC’s ‘if not, why not’ corporate governance framework. In particular, it investigates 2 recommended practices relating to the board subcommittees and whether any particular factors determine a company’s decision to comply with those practices. The investigation of 268 Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) listed companies using panel data between 2004 and 2007 provides statistically convincing evidence that certain factors are likely to influence the company’s responses with respect to board subcommittee related best practices. This finding is consistent with the underlying philosophy of the ‘if not, why not’ corporate governance framework and generally accepted view that when it comes to corporate governance; one-size-does-not-fit-all.

Suggested Citation

  • Tek Lama, 2014. "Board Subcommittees: If Not, Why Not?," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(3), pages 117-117, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/5177/3102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/5177
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Akkermans & Hans Van Ees & Niels Hermes & Reggy Hooghiemstra & Gerwin Van der Laan & Theo Postma & Arjen Van Witteloostuijn, 2007. "Corporate Governance in the Netherlands: an overview of the application of the Tabaksblat Code in 2004," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(6), pages 1106-1118, November.
    2. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    3. Arcot, Sridhar & Bruno, Valentina & Faure-Grimaud, Antoine, 2010. "Corporate governance in the UK: Is the comply or explain approach working?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 193-201, June.
    4. David Seidl & Paul Sanderson & John Roberts, 2009. "Applying 'Comply-or-Explain': Conformance with Codes of Corporate Governance in the UK and Germany," Working Papers wp389, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    5. Iain MacNeil & Xiao Li, 2006. "“Comply or Explain”: market discipline and non‐compliance with the Combined Code," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 486-496, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter J Baldacchino & Claire Vella & Simon Grima, 2019. "The Corporate Governance Code and Compliance by Maltese Listed Companies," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 71-90.
    2. Sergakis Konstantinos, 2015. "Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the “Comply or Explain” Principle in EU Capital Markets," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 233-288, November.
    3. Leona Achtenhagen & Petra Inwinkl & Jacob Björktorp & Robert Källenius, 2018. "More than two decades after the Cadbury Report: How far has Sweden, as role model for corporate-governance practices, come?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 235-251, November.
    4. David Seidl & Paul Sanderson & John Roberts, 2013. "Applying the ‘comply-or-explain’ principle: discursive legitimacy tactics with regard to codes of corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(3), pages 791-826, August.
    5. Rose, Caspar, 2016. "Firm performance and comply or explain disclosure in corporate governance," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 202-222.
    6. Shrives, Philip J. & Brennan, Niamh M., 2015. "A typology for exploring the quality of explanations for non-compliance with UK corporate governance regulations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 85-99.
    7. Arping, Stefan & Sautner, Zacharias, 2010. "Corporate governance and leverage: Evidence from a natural experiment," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 127-134, June.
    8. Colleen Honigsberg, 2019. "Hedge Fund Regulation and Fund Governance: Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Disclosure Rules," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(4), pages 845-888, September.
    9. Ahmad, Sardar & Akbar, Saeed & Halari, Anwar & Shah, Syed Zubair, 2021. "Organizational non-compliance with principles-based governance provisions and corporate risk-taking," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Shan, Yuan George & Troshani, Indrit & Tarca, Ann, 2019. "Managerial ownership, audit firm size, and audit fees: Australian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 18-36.
    11. Björn Fasterling, 2012. "Development of Norms Through Compliance Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 73-87, March.
    12. Koładkiewicz Izabela, 2017. "The Quality of Explanations for Deviation from Principles of Corporate Governance. An Introduction," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 25(3), pages 34-54, September.
    13. Adel Elgharbawy & Magdy Abdel-Kader, 2013. "Enterprise governance and value-based management: a theoretical contingency framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 99-129, February.
    14. Sardar Ahmad & Saeed Akbar & Devendra Kodwani & Anwar Halari & Syed Zubair Shah, 2023. "Compliance or non‐compliance during financial crisis: Does it matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2348-2366, July.
    15. Talaulicar Till, 2011. "Normierungseffekte der Co-Regulierung von Standards guter Corporate Governance / Normative effects of co-regulatory regimes of corporate governance," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 269-296, January.
    16. Romilda Mazzotta & Giovanni Bronzetti & Graziella Sicoli & Paolo Tenuta, 2018. "La valutazione del CdA in contesti ad elevata concentrazione proprietaria: mero conformismo o reale strumento di valutazione?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 107-128.
    17. Marius Eugen ROGOZ & Dragoș Andrei STOICA, 2024. "How Do Listed Romanian Companies Comply with or Explain Good Corporate Governance Guidelines?," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(7), pages 51-61, July.
    18. Elisa Baraibar-Diez & María D Odriozola & José Luis Fernández Sánchez, 2016. "Transparency through European corporate governance codes," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(3), pages 244-261, August.
    19. Sophie Harnay & Fabienne Llense & Antoine Rebérioux & Gwenaël Roudaut, 2024. "Gender equality within boards: comparing quota and soft law," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-35, April.
    20. Emilia Tomczyk & Maria Aluchna, 2015. "Shareholder structure and compliance with the board best practice: econometric analysis," Applied Econometrics Papers, Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 51-75.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.