IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/wpaper/y2017v9i1p39-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will The Eastern Partnership Become A Driver For Agriculture?

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana OKHRIMENKO

    (Doctor of Economics, Prof. of International Economics Department, National Technical University of Ukraine "Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Alexander OKHRIMENKO

    (Associate professor, President of the Ukrainian Analytical Centre, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

This article is devoted to the impact of the Eastern Partnership on agricultural production of the member states. ENPARD basic parameters are examined. The results of agricultural development of the states participating in ENPARD and states preparing to join the project was monitored. The Eastern partnership is based on a deep and comprehensive free trade area (DCFTA), economic integration and convergence with EU policies, energy security, human contacts etc. The absolute and relative indicators of agricultural development of the Eastern Partnership countries are analysed. The general and individual problems of the countries are studied. The analysis showed an unequal economic potential for agricultural development. It was noted that the strategic partnership involves interstate cooperation to achieve mutually beneficial internal and external goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana OKHRIMENKO & Alexander OKHRIMENKO, 2017. "Will The Eastern Partnership Become A Driver For Agriculture?," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 9(1), pages 39-57, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2017:v:9:i:1:p:39-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2017_XIX1_OKH.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Spielman & Klaus Grebmer, 2006. "Public–Private Partnerships in International Agricultural Research: An Analysis of Constraints," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 291-300, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hall, Andy & Dijkman, Jeroen & Sulaiman, Rasheed, 2010. "Research Into Use: Investigating the Relationship between Agricultural Research and Innovation," MERIT Working Papers 2010-044, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Laurens Klerkx & Andy Hall & Cees Leeuwis, 2009. "Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer?," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(5/6), pages 409-438.
    3. Droppelmann, Klaus & Mapila, Mariam A. T. J. & Mazunda, John & Thangata, Paul & Yauney, Jason, 2013. "Who talks to whom in African agricultural research information networks? The Malawi case," IFPRI discussion papers 1264, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Spielman, David J., 2007. "Pro-poor agricultural biotechnology: Can the international research system deliver the goods?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 189-204, April.
    5. Jean Charles Ononino & Cyrille Bergaly Kamdem & Raymond Ekodo & Yannick Fosso Djoumessi, 2024. "Diffusion and adoption of agricultural innovations: the role of a market based on public-private partnership in Cameroon," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(3), pages 904-917.
    6. Prain, Gordon & Wheatley, Christopher & Odsey, Cameron & Verzola, Leonora & Bertuso, Arma & Roa, Julieta & Naziri, Diego, 2020. "Research-development partnerships for scaling complex innovation: Lessons from the Farmer Business School in IFAD-supported loan-grant collaborations in Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Ramani, Shyama & SadreGhazi, Shuan & Duysters, Geert, 2010. "On the Delivery of Pro-Poor Innovations: Managerial Lessons from Sanitation Activists in India," MERIT Working Papers 2010-018, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Hermans, Frans & Geerling-Eiff, Floor & Potters, Jorieke & Klerkx, Laurens, 2019. "Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 88, pages 76-95.
    9. Richard Lynch & Maeve Henchion & John J. Hyland & José A. Gutiérrez, 2022. "Creating a Rainbow for Sustainability: The Case of Sustainable Beef," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Jason Coupet & Yuhao Ba, 2022. "Benchmarking university technology transfer performance with external research funding: a stochastic frontier analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 605-620, April.
    11. Stefan Mann, 2014. "A Comparative Study of Institutionalizing Public Plant Breeding," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 373-383, September.
    12. Ai Rui & Xiao Shishun & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi, 2022. "Does Rural Operation System Reform Enhance Agricultural Output? Evidence from Sichuan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Partnership; convergence; agricultural development; economic integration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2017:v:9:i:1:p:39-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.